similar to: Inherited S4 methods

Dear all, Maybe, I am doing something wrong, but using R-2.5.0 on my Intel-Mac, I have problems using function callNextMethod() in method initialize. I am loading the following code as file "testS4.R": setClass("baseClass", representation(myname = "character", mydir = "character", "VIRTUAL"),

Hi, I would like to use std::shared_ptr in my pass. However I'm facing a problem wrt RTTI. If I have a code like: std::shared_ptr<BaseClass> x(new DerivedClass()); ... std::shared_ptr<DerivedClass> p = std::dynamic_pointer_cast<DerivedClass>(x); It does not compile since the default RTTI infrastructure is not used by LLVM. Also, it's not clear to me if the

Dear all, Currently, I am trying to create a test package "testS4" using S4 classes, which I am attaching. Running R CMD check gives the following error: coeurebooks-computer:/Volumes/CoreData/CRAN cs$ R CMD check testS4_0.1.1.tar.gz * checking for working latex ...sh: line 1: latex: command not found NO * using log directory '/Volumes/CoreData/CRAN/testS4.Rcheck' * using R

Dear all, Assume that I have an S4 class "MyClass" with a slot "myname", which is initialized to: myname="" in method("initialize"): myclass <- new("MyClass", myname="") Assume that class "MyClass" has a method "mymethod": "mymethod.MyClass" <- function(object, myname=character(0), ...) {

It''s been a few days since I posted my last two emails (of which, no one replied to) so I''ve gone ahead and coded a working slider class as well as a ''resizeable'' class that allows a user to drag and resize the element. I also linked these two together as I want to have slider behavior that can resize the resizeable element. The end result is both the

Dear all, To explain my problem I am attaching a demonstration package "myclasspkg": I have the following two S4 classes with similar inheritance: SubSubClassA <- SubClassB <- BaseClass SubSubClassB <- SubClassB <- BaseClass In R I am calling the following functions: > library(myclasspkg) > subA <-

Hi, I''m having trouble with some STI Classes in a test. When I create a new Class of an STI derived base class the type column is not set. If I do object = DerivedClass.create!(params) then object[:type] == nil for some reason. Any ideas why this is so? I assumed rails takes care of setting the type column in STI (that''s what I read). Nico

The current r-devel (aka R 1.7.0) now attaches the package "methods" by default at startup. A new option, "defaultPackages", is set to c("methods", "ctest") by default, causing the .First in package base to require those two packages at startup. There are two main known differences from having methods attached: - the definition of class() changes, in

Am 30.06.2010 um 23:31 schrieb John Criswell: > > Stupid question: is making the getOperand() method of CallInst > going to work? For example, if I have the following code: > > void > method (Instruction * I) { > I->getOperand(2); > ... > } > > void method2 (CallInst * CI) { > method (CI); > ... > } > > Will method() still work

I have this config: # BL00070 - Disable NFS service {["nfs","nfslock","netfs","portmap"]: ensure => stopped, enable => false, } user {"rpc": ensure => absent, provider => "useradd" } user {"rpcuser": ensure => absent, provider => "useradd" } file

JavaScript doesn''t (yet) have a notion of classes. Prototype.js just adds a suitable convention for implementing them. It provides a way to create a new class by extending a base class using Object.extend, but it doesn''t handle method inheritance. There are ways of doing implementing this through traversing the chain of prototypes, but I''m not sure they are

Gabor Greif wrote: > Am 30.06.2010 um 23:31 schrieb John Criswell: > > >> Stupid question: is making the getOperand() method of CallInst >> going to work? For example, if I have the following code: >> >> void >> method (Instruction * I) { >> I->getOperand(2); >> ... >> } >> >> void method2 (CallInst * CI) {

Hi, The following question might come from my (deep) misunderstanding of the concepts in the package 'methods'. I have a class 'A', and a class 'B' inheriting 'A' (so defined with 'setClass' and the parameter 'contains="A"'. The class A has a method 'mymethod'. A call to 'showMethods("mymethod")' return the

Apologies for asking something that is probably super obvious, i just started with S4 classes and i guess i am not finding documentation that layout the grammar rules and give enough examples. Some questions i am having are these 1. I understand that main method of writing a member function is to write a generic function and setMethod for this particular object. This, however, presumes that there

On May 9, 2012, at 4:27 AM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > Hello Jonas, > >> I wonder, what would be the best solution for instructions that require >> operands in a particular register, and even gives the result in a particular >> register? > You need to custom select such instruction. See e.g. div / idiv on x86 > as an example. That's often easiest, yes;

Gabor Greif wrote: > Hi all, > > I am almost ready for the last step with landing my long-standing patch. > I have converted (almost) all low-level interface users of CallInst to > respective high-level interfaces. What remains is a handful of hunks > to flip the switch. > > But before I do the final commit I'd like to coerce all external users > to code against the

Hi all, I am almost ready for the last step with landing my long-standing patch. I have converted (almost) all low-level interface users of CallInst to respective high-level interfaces. What remains is a handful of hunks to flip the switch. But before I do the final commit I'd like to coerce all external users to code against the high-level interface too. This will (almost, but see below)

Hi, Strange things happen. Here is a simple example: > setClass("A", contains="integer") > setMethod("as.matrix", "A", function(x, ...) t(callNextMethod())) Creating a generic function for ?as.matrix? from package ?base? in the global environment [1] "as.matrix" > a <- new("A", 1:3) > as.matrix(a)

If a class is derived from a superclass using 'contains', then coercion of an object from the class to the superclass fails to preserve the 'package' attribute of class of the object. This occurs only when the derived class has no additional slots. This is a problem because the 'new' function relies on the exact identity of the class, including the package attribute.

I've got some calls like: musttail call void bitcast (i32 (i32, i8*, %Type*)* @MyMethod to void (i32, i8*)*)(i32 %0, i8* %1) ret void Into something like: %8 = tail call i32 @MyMethod(i32 %0, i8* %1, %Type* null) ret void I realize I'm losing a parameter there, but this is an interface jump trick I use and relies on the end code being a 'jmp' (x86). I realize i can probably