similar to: CEBA-2005:1120-1 CentOS 4 x86_64 xfsprogs - bugfix update (CENTOSPLUS Only)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "CEBA-2005:1120-1 CentOS 4 x86_64 xfsprogs - bugfix update (CENTOSPLUS Only)"

2005 Nov 20
0
CEBA-2005:1120-1 CentOS 4 i386 xfsprogs - bugfix update (CENTOSPLUS Only)
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2005:1120-1 CentOS 4 i386 xfsprogs - bugfix update (CENTOSPLUS Only) This package is for the version of xfsprogs is that is included in the centosplus repo for CentOS-4 ... this is not an update to the main CentOS-4 repo. The SGI team has released a new xfsprogs SRPM for the XFS project. The following items have changed since the last release of this package:
2005 Nov 21
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 9, Issue 13
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When
2009 Dec 05
1
Building xfsprogs can't find valid UUID library
On CentOS 5.3 x86_64, I'm trying to build xfsprogs-2.9.4-1.el5.centos.x86_64 with -ggdb so I can use it with gdb and examine the data structures when using xfs_db. I've installed the src rpm as a non-root user and when I run rpmbuild -bc during the ./configure I get the error: . . . checking uuid.h usability... no checking uuid.h presence... no checking for uuid.h... no checking
2012 Jul 09
1
[PATCH] NEW API: add new api xfs_info
Add xfs_info to show the geometry of the xfs filesystem. Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong at cn.fujitsu.com> --- Hi Rich, This patch add xfs_info, and start the xfs support work. I'd like to add the xfs support, like xfs_growfs, xfs_io, xfs_db, xfs_repair etc. Any thoughts? Thanks, Wanlong Gao daemon/Makefile.am | 1 + daemon/xfs.c | 69
2013 Jun 28
0
CEBA-2013:0987 CentOS 6 xfsprogs Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:0987 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0987.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 913a469fcb72eb3de668ae39c1cfa33b57e45b341d353e2ede3ca8aed09e13d1 xfsprogs-3.1.1-10.el6_4.1.i686.rpm
2015 Aug 06
1
xfs quota weirdness
Hi all, I have a quota problem with xfs (xfsprogs 3.1.7+b1 on debian GNU/Linux 7 -- wheezy) and samba-4.1.19. If I set a user quota to say 10GB, windows explorer reports a 20GB quota of which none used. If I change quota to x, windows explorer reports 2x space of which none used. So I assume samba is somehow getting (albeit incomplete and incorrect) xfs quota info from operating system. disks
2017 Jan 18
0
CEBA-2017:0100 CentOS 7 xfsprogs BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2017:0100 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017-0100.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: baefb72e22070725238d2cc762c4cc293f6fea3f1bf612397c5499d317cd45a1 xfsprogs-4.5.0-9.el7_3.i686.rpm
2017 Jun 29
0
CEBA-2017:1607 CentOS 7 xfsprogs BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2017:1607 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017-1607.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 87ae485753769dfb65699bbed13b87b4de3dbd0cacc3feeda3913efd7e1fffec xfsprogs-4.5.0-10.el7_3.i686.rpm
2019 Mar 19
0
CEBA-2019:0516 CentOS 7 xfsprogs BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2019:0516 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0516 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 0ed8d5c83c6ac2ed42dee9b1781b96f183f65d16b651d2a52c5549082878659f xfsprogs-4.5.0-19.el7_6.i686.rpm
2012 Aug 21
1
[PATCH] xfs: add a new api xfs_repair
Add a new api xfs_repair for repairing an XFS filesystem. Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong at cn.fujitsu.com> --- daemon/xfs.c | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ generator/generator_actions.ml | 23 ++++++++ gobject/Makefile.inc | 6 ++- po/POTFILES | 1 + src/MAX_PROC_NR | 2 +- 5 files changed, 145
2017 Mar 12
0
[PATCH v4 3/7] New API: yara_load
The yara_load API allows to load a set of Yara rules contained within a file on the host. Rules can be in binary format, as when compiled with yarac command, or in source code format. In the latter case, the rules will be first compiled and then loaded. Subsequent calls of the yara_load API will result in the discard of the previously loaded rules. Signed-off-by: Matteo Cafasso
2010 Apr 13
2
XFS-filesystem corrupted by defragmentation Was: Performance problems with XFS on Centos 5.4
Before I'd try to defragment my whole filesystem (see attached mail for whole story) I figured "Let's try it on some file". So I did > xfs_bmap /raid/Temp/someDiskimage.iso [output shows 101 extents and 1 hole] Then I defragmented the file > xfs_fsr /raid/Temp/someDiskimage.iso extents before:101 after:3 DONE > xfs_bmap /raid/Temp/someDiskimage.iso [output shows 3
2007 Sep 06
1
CentOS 5 - base kernel vs. centosplus for XFS
I notice that the same versions of kmod-xfs and xfsprogs etc. are in both the extras and centosplus repositories for centos5. Is there any particular reason to use the centosplus kernel if what I'm primarily interested in is XFS filesystem support? I presume that if I am using the plus kernel, then I must use the plus versions of kmod-xfs etc., but I'm wondering whether I need the plus
2017 Apr 04
0
[PATCH v5 3/7] New API: yara_load
The yara_load API allows to load a set of Yara rules contained within a file on the host. Rules can be in binary format, as when compiled with yarac command, or in source code format. In the latter case, the rules will be first compiled and then loaded. Subsequent calls of the yara_load API will result in the discard of the previously loaded rules. Signed-off-by: Matteo Cafasso
2007 Mar 05
1
Deletion of xattr don't sync
Is there option for deleting xattr-s same as --delete for files, because it seems deletion of xattr don't sync, however it is synced when data of file change, see example below. Maybe this is a bug or maybe this is ok? System gentoo attr-2.4.32, rsync form today cvs. -- Regards Stanislaw Gruszka stasiu@sg /mnt/hda5/export $ echo "data" > file stasiu@sg /mnt/hda5/export $
2023 May 04
1
'error=No space left on device' but, there is plenty of space all nodes
Hi Strahil and Gluster users, Yes I had checked but, checked again and only 1% inode usage. 99% free. Same every node. Example: [root at nybaknode1 ]# df -i /lvbackups/brick Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on /dev/mapper/vgbackups-lvbackups 3108921344 93602 3108827742 1% /lvbackups [root at nybaknode1 ]# I neglected to clarify in
2023 May 02
1
'error=No space left on device' but, there is plenty of space all nodes
Hi Gluster users, We are seeing 'error=No space left on device' issue and hoping someone might could advise? We are using a 12 node glusterfs v10.4 distributed vsftpd backup cluster for years (not new) and recently 2 weeks ago upgraded to v9 > v10.4. I do not know if the upgrade is related to this new issue. We are seeing a new issue 'error=No space left on device' error
2023 May 04
1
'error=No space left on device' but, there is plenty of space all nodes
Hi,Have you checked inode usage (df -i /lvbackups/brick ) ? Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov On Tuesday, May 2, 2023, 3:05 AM, brandon at thinkhuge.net wrote: Hi Gluster users, We are seeing 'error=No space left on device' issue and hoping someone might could advise? We are using a 12 node glusterfs v10.4 distributed vsftpd backup cluster for years (not new) and recently 2 weeks ago
2005 Aug 10
1
Why only a "" string for heading for row.names with write.csv with a matrix?
Consider: > x <- matrix(1:6, 2,3) > rownames(x) <- c("ID1", "ID2") > colnames(x) <- c("Attr1", "Attr2", "Attr3") > x Attr1 Attr2 Attr3 ID1 1 3 5 ID2 2 4 6 > write.csv(x,file="x.csv") "","Attr1","Attr2","Attr3" "ID1",1,3,5
2012 Jan 04
1
AR update / create pattern: is there an easier way?
I find myself writing the following frequently: r = MyActiveRecord.where(:attr1 => cond1, :attr2 => cond2, ...) r.exists? ? r.first : r.create ... which has the effect of returning an instance of MyActiveRecord if all the conditions are met, or creating one if it doesn''t. A variant of this: c = MyActiveRecord.new(:attr1 => val1, :attr2 => val2, ...) r =