similar to: Problem using ofstream in C++ class in package for MacOS X

Hi all: we have noticed for quite a while that certain errors cannot be handled by R try, tryCatch etc blocks, but it was fairly difficult to understand what were the conditions for this incorrect behaviour. Finally I stabbed across a very understandable case, which is outlined in the (runnable) example below. The main message is: wrapping an S4 method call in a try block will not help if an

We can get the llvm assembler for a Module with something as simple as std::ofstream f("code.llvm"); f << *M; Is there a method for obtaining the llvm assembler of a given Function? -- Óscar

It seems that support for dumping text representation of LLVM objects to standard channels and C++ output streams was removed. My guess is that now we must use errs() instead of std::cerr, llvm::raw_fd_ostream instead of std::ofstream, etc. The changes are not trivial, as for instance llvm::raw_fd_ostream without flags fails if the file exists, but std::ofstream does not. The changes include

Hi Kostya & Yury, Thanks for the advice. On 9 February 2016 at 22:48, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: > Hi Dan, > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Dan Liew <dan at su-root.co.uk> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> # TL;DR >> >> I've been building an application with and without the address >> sanitizer (with gcc 5.3 and

Hello, Any call to xapian-compact compiled for Win32/Cygwin ultimately fails when it tries to rename/replace iamflint.tmp with the final version. The reason is you cannot rename an opened file with Win32/Cygwin libc. To correct this, just close the output ofstream (xapian-compact.cc(534)) like: """ ofstream output(dest.c_str()); if (!output.write(buf, input.gcount())) { cerr

Apologies for asking something that is probably super obvious, i just started with S4 classes and i guess i am not finding documentation that layout the grammar rules and give enough examples. Some questions i am having are these 1. I understand that main method of writing a member function is to write a generic function and setMethod for this particular object. This, however, presumes that there

Hi All, I am trying to write code for simple instrumentation. What I want to do is to insert a call to an external function for result of each conditional branch instruction. This external function simply print true or false based on the result of condition. The modified code is then written into new file. However when I try to link that file with another bitcode file (containing external

If someone is able, can you tell me if there is a better way to do this? More specifically, do I have to rewrite all of the data members stuff and extend stuff of parent class in the child class? See below. Thanks in advance! Example 1: setConstructorS3("ClassA", function(A,x) { if(missing(A))A=15; if(missing(x))x=NA; extend(Object(), "ClassA", .size = A, .x=x

Hi to all members, i have a question about class inheritance and methods using R.oo package: I have the following code and it doesn't work, guess i'm doing smth wrong and there is nothing in the help. library(R.oo) setConstructorS3("ClassA", function(A=15) { extend(Object(), "ClassA", .size = A ); }) setMethodS3("print", "ClassA",

On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Nehal Gandhi <nbg2k7 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > > > I am trying to write code for simple instrumentation. What I want to do is > to insert a call to an external function for result of each conditional > branch instruction. This external function simply print true or false based > on the result of condition. The modified code is

I'd like to suggest that whenever there is no S3 method implementation available for a particular class, that the error message would also report the class structure of the object dispatched on. Example: foo <- function(...) UseMethod("foo") foo.ClassA <- function(object, ...) { cat("foo() for ClassA called.\n") } > foo(structure(1, class="ClassA"))

Hi Eli, Let's say I have a file ClassA.h, that pairs with a file ClassA.cpp to product a library libClassA.a. ClassA.h contains the single declaration. class A {...}; I want to transform it to: #include "ClassB.h" class A : public class B {...}; ClassB.h is the header file for a library libClassB.a built from ClassB.cpp and ClassB.h. I can clearly link libClassB with libClassA.

On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 1:42 AM, David Minor<dahvid.minor at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Eli, > Let's say I have a file ClassA.h, that pairs with a file ClassA.cpp > to product a library libClassA.a. > ClassA.h contains the single declaration. > > class A {...}; > > I want to transform it to: > > #include "ClassB.h" > > class A : public class B

Hi folks, just installed the new llvm 1.9 build and noticed that my code no longer worked. It seems something has changed with addPassesToEmitFile(). First, the arguments to that method changed so that it no longer takes a PassManager, but only a FunctionPassManager. Instead there is a addPassesToEmitWholeFile() method, but that is marked as optional, and when I change my code to

Hi! I have implemented class specific behaviour of "[[<-.myclass"<-function(). How it is posible to call the "[[.default" on an object of myclass? Eryk Dipl. bio-chem. Eryk Witold Wolski @ MPI-MG Dep. Vertebrate Genomics Ihnestrasse 73 14195 Berlin 'v' tel: 0049-30-84131285 / \ mail: wolski@molgen.mpg.de ---W-W----

Hello all, I recently foudn myself wanting to view the basic blocks in the selection DAG as pure DAGs - so just as a list of edges, with no other information. I added the below code to the start of the " void SelectionDAGISel::CodeGenAndEmitDAG()" function. It creates a separate txt file for each basic block and gives a list of edges between nodes. The segment of code is below -

Dear list, It seems that S4 methods defined for an S3 'base' generic are not used in 'base' functions. This can be problematic when 'base' functions start with something like 'as.matrix'. ### START R code setClass("classA", contains = "matrix", representation(realData = "numeric")) setMethod("as.matrix",

On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 1:16 PM, David Minor<dahvid.minor at gmail.com> wrote: > I'm writing a code transformation that involves adding an include to > existing code, adding a base class > to and existing class and then linking with a previously compiled library. > The main problem for me > seems to be how can I add the include?  Can I compile the include alone to > byte

Dear experts, I am learning llvm by reading documents and have a question to ask. The following is the example of code generation that I created. [[a [10.00]] > [3.00]] ; ModuleID = 'ExprF' define i1 @expr(double* %record) { entry: %0 = getelementptr double* %record, i32 0 ; <double*> [#uses=1] %1 = load double* %0 ; <double>

I'm writing a code transformation that involves adding an include to existing code, adding a base class to and existing class and then linking with a previously compiled library. The main problem for me seems to be how can I add the include? Can I compile the include alone to byte code and pre-pend it? Should I compile the library, which includes the include and parse out the include and