similar to: "[", .local and S4 methods (was: "[" operator and indexing ambiguity)

Hi, when running the following on a fresh R, library("IRanges") annotation showMethods("annotation") Biobase:::annotation showMethods("annotation") I get (see the "^^^^^" marked output at the bottom): > library("IRanges") Carico il pacchetto richiesto: 'IRanges' The following object(s) are masked from package:base :

Dear R developers, I am having a slightly weird issue with a S4 method defined in my package adegenet 1.2-4, with R 2.11.0. As far as I know, the problem is new, and the code implementing the method has not changed for more than a year and worked well so far. The problem is the following. I define, in the package, a method "[" for the S4 class 'genind'. The method's

Dear all, It seems that textConnection() can trigger a segmentation fault. The following script (using two large loops) makes this bug reproducible: for (i in 1:10000) { z=textConnection(NULL,open='w') for (j in 1:100) { write(runif(1)*1e6,file=z) write('\n',file=z) } close(z) } The bug could be reproduced on R-2.6.1, R-2.7.0 and on the latest R-devel

Does anyone notice r-devel thread "stopifnot() does not stop at first non-TRUE argument" starting with https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2017-May/074179.html ? I have mentioned (function(...)nargs())(...) in https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2017-May/074294.html . Something like ..elt(n) is switch(n, ...) . I have mentioned it in

I think this is a known issue with Java messing with the stack, see e.g. http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Error-memory-exhausted-limit-reached-td4729708.html. I'll fix the infinite recursion caused by the methods package. Michael On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Wolfgang Huber <wolfgang.huber at embl.de> wrote: > Dear Hilmar > > Perhaps this gives an indication of why the

The one difference I see, is the necessity to pass the dots to the function dotlength : dotlength <- function(...) nargs() myfun <- function(..., someArg = 1){ n1 <- ...length() n2 <- dotlength() n3 <- dotlength(...) return(c(n1, n2, n3)) } myfun(stop("A"), stop("B"), someArg = stop("c")) I don't really see immediately how one can

Hi, I am working on writing some S4 classes that represent multidimensional (brain) image data. I would like these classes to support standard array indexing. I have been studying the Matrix and EBImage (http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/1.9/bioc/html/EBImage.html) packages to see how this is done. When using objects of the "array" class directly, R distinguishes between the calls:

huber at ebi.ac.uk wrote: > Full_Name: Wolfgang Huber > Version: R version 2.4.0 Under development (unstable) (2006-07-09 r38523) > OS: i686-pc-linux-gnu > Submission from: (NULL) (62.253.128.15) > > > There appears to be unintentional behaviour in the size of the bounding box for > PDF graphics produced with the current R2.4, compared to 2.3.1. I posted two PDF >

Dear all, is there a good way to create SVG plots with R whose elements have titles (tooltips) or act as hyperlinks? I am using the RSvgDevice package, which works great - but it doesn't seem to support the notion that plot objects have titles or are act as hyperlinks, so I am helping myself by giving the objects funny unique colors and then postprocessing the .svg file. I wonder

Dear developers: I have just came across an (unexpected to me) behaviour of lists when assigning NULLs to list elements. I understand that a NULL is a valid R object, thus assigning a NULL to a list element should yield exactly the same result as assigning any other object. So I was surprised when assigning a NULL in fact removed the element from the list. Is this an intended behaviour? If

Dear Prof. Ripley I noted a change in the behaviour of "cov", which is very reasonable: ## R version 2.7.0 Under development (unstable) (2007-11-30 r43565) > cov(as.numeric(NA), as.numeric(NA), use="complete.obs") Error in cov(as.numeric(NA), as.numeric(NA), use = "complete.obs") : no complete element pairs whereas earlier behavior was, for example: ## R

Hi, I want to implement a '[' for an S4 class, that behaves differently when called with a single index argument or multiple indexes (possibly missing), like what happens when subsetting matrices x[i] vs. x[i, ]. I manage to do it using nargs() and checking if drop is missing (see code below), but when I want to add an extra argument to the method (before drop), then the parent call

Dear R users & developers, Seth Falcon and Martin Morgan are teaching Advanced R Programming and Bioconductor 30 March - 1 April 2007 at the Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK. This two-day course focuses on programming skills required to develop software for statistical analysis of high-throughput genomic data using R and Bioconductor. Lectures and practical sessions

Hi, I am finding the recently added [1] functionality of embedding raster images into plots on R devices very useful! Thanks to Paul Murrell and others for providing that. I noted that in https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/src/library/grDevices/src/devPS.c a macro is defined: #define MAX_RASTERS 64, and consequently, I get Error in grid.Call.graphics("L_raster", x$raster, x$x, x$y,

Hi, on R version 2.15.1 (2012-06-22) (Platform: i686-pc-linux-gnu (32-bit)) sourced functions have srcref attached as an attribute. Are such data also available for S4 generics and methods? How? (See sample code below) Thank you. Bests, Renaud f <- textConnection( " f <- function(){} setGeneric('myfun', function(x, ...) standardGeneric('myfun'))

Hello, If the signature of a method defines which generic it implements then I'm confused about why this minimal example I invented won't work : setGeneric("myFun", function(rs, ...){standardGeneric("myFun")}) setGeneric("myFun", function(cs, ...){standardGeneric("myFun")}) setMethod("myFun", "numeric", function(rs, colour =

Hello. I am trying to write an S4 method for rbind(). I have a class of objects called 'mdm', and I want to be able to rbind() them to one another. I do not want the method for rbind() to coerce anything to an mdm object. I want rbind(x1,x2,x1,x2) to work as expected [ie rbind() should take any number of arguments]. This is what I have so far: setGeneric(".rbind_pair",

On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 10:51 AM S Ellison <S.Ellison at lgcgroup.com> wrote: > > > When trying out some variations with `[.data.frame` I noticed some (to me) > > odd behaviour, > > Not just in 'myfun' ... > > plot(x=1:10, y=) > plot(x=1:10, y=, 10:1) > > In both cases, 'y=' is ignored. In the first, the plot is for y=NULL (so not

Full_Name: Colin A. Smith Version: 1.8.0 OS: Mac OS X 10.2.6 Submission from: (NULL) (216.102.90.18) Both Biobase and my package annaffy use S4 classes to define methods for "[". Both packages use the save image method of installation. (See annaffy 1.0.3 in BioC CVS.) Depending on how both packages are loaded, the Biobase definitions seem to be getting masked out: >

I've installed R-devel R Under development (unstable) (2014-07-09 r66111) Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin13.1.0 (64-bit) and am trying to resolve some problems that I am seeing with my SparseM package. In prior versions I explicitly had: setGeneric("image", function(x, ...) standardGeneric("image")) and then used setMethod to define a method for the class matrix.csr but