similar to: preserving sparse matrices (Matrix)

Hi, I just tried to upgrade Nixpkgs to R 3.5.0, but unfortunately the new version fails its regression test suite. We configure the build using the flags "--without-recommended-packages", in case that's relevant. You can see a complete build log with all relevant information at [1]. Anyway, the test failures look like this: | make[3]: Entering directory

Hi, I got the following error. Sorry but this time I couldn't reproduce it with a simple chunk of code: .TM.repl.i.2col(): drop 'matrix' case ... Error in .nextMethod(x = x, i = i, j = j) : 'i' has no integer column number should never happen; please report In addition: Warning messages: 1: Ambiguous method selection for "%*%", target

Friends I'm not seeing why the following occurs: > T1 <- (A1 - A2) %*% D > T2 <- (A1 %*% D) - (A2 %*% D) > identical(T1, T2) [1] FALSE Harold > dput(A1) new("dsCMatrix" , i = c(0L, 1L, 2L, 3L, 0L, 1L, 4L, 2L, 3L, 5L) , p = c(0L, 1L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 7L, 10L) , Dim = c(6L, 6L) , Dimnames = list(NULL, NULL) , x = c(5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 10, 5, 5, 10)

>>>>> Michael Lawrence <lawrence.michael at gene.com> >>>>> on Sun, 1 Feb 2015 19:23:06 -0800 writes: > I've implemented the proposed changes in > R-devel. Minimally tested, so please try it. It should > delegate to r/cbind2 when there is at least one S4 > argument and S3 dispatch fails (so you'll probably want to

Are you able to create a reproducible example, somehow? Thanks, Michael On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Mario Annau <mario.annau at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Michael, > I've tested your change in r67699 (using r67773) and the function now > correctly dispatches to r/cbind2 within the R-session without > bind_activation(TRUE). However, running unit tests using R CMD check I

>>>>> Michael Lawrence <lawrence.michael at gene.com> >>>>> on Sat, 24 Jan 2015 06:39:37 -0800 writes: > On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 12:58 AM, Mario Annau > <mario.annau at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi all, this question has already been posted on >> stackoverflow, however without success, see also >>

>>>>> Mario Annau <mario.annau at gmail.com> >>>>> on Wed, 11 Feb 2015 20:18:53 +0100 writes: > sorry - I just got irritated by my different R-versions. > The behaviour I described in the previous mail was discovered using R > 3.1.2 without bind_activation(TRUE). In r67773 all calls are delegated > to r/cbind.matrix and not

On 23/04/2018 6:33 AM, Peter Simons wrote: > Hi, > > I just tried to upgrade Nixpkgs to R 3.5.0, but unfortunately the new > version fails its regression test suite. We configure the build using > the flags "--without-recommended-packages", in case that's relevant. You > can see a complete build log with all relevant information at [1]. > Anyway, the test

Fine with me as long as eliminating the inconveniences associated with it can be put on the roadmap. The alias instability and the fact that the user has no way to know if s/he should do ?`foo,numeric-method` or ?`foo,numeric,ANY-method` to find the method has been a long-standing problem. H. On 3/21/19 21:29, Michael Lawrence wrote: If we started over, I'd try to avoid this sort of

Hi all, this question has already been posted on stackoverflow, however without success, see also http://stackoverflow.com/questions/27886535/proper-way-to-use-cbind-rbind-with-s4-classes-in-package. I have written a package using S4 classes and would like to use the functions rbind, cbind with these defined classes. Since it does not seem to be possible to define rbind and cbind directly as S4

As some of you may have seen / heard in the past, it is not possible to make cbind() and rbind() into proper S4 generic functions, since their first formal argument is '...'. [ BTW: S3-methods for these of course only dispatch on the first argument which is also not really satisfactory in the context of many possible matrix classes.] For this reason, after quite some discussion on

This was originally a bug report about Matrix, https://r-forge.r-project.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=294&aid=6325&group_id=61 but the bug is rather a "design" bug in R, or a limitation. This e-mail is a report of the status quo as I see it, and call for comments, sugguests, help/hints for workarounds, or even a suggestion for a programming task helping R core to amend

Dear All, I´m using the following code: all1<-gg2[[1]][[1]]; for(i in 1:48){ all1 <- rbind(all1,gg2[[i]][[1]]) } to create a new matrix that contains all the matrices in a list called gg2. gg2 is a list that looks like >> gg2 [[1]] [[1]][[1]] <matrix one> [[2]] [[2]][[1]] <matrix two> . . . [[48]] [[48]][[1]] <matrix 48> Is there a faster way to do the rbind?

I mistakenly left a write in "/tmp" in the rockchalk package (version 1.8.109) that I uploaded last Friday. Kurt H wrote and asked me to fix today. While uploading a new one, I became aware of a problem I had not seen. The version I uploaded last Friday, 1.8.109, has OK status on all platforms except r-release-windows-ix86+x86_64. I get OK on oldrel-windows and also on devel-windows.

In a newly downloaded version (today) of R-2-4-0alpha, with all packages from CRAN also installed today, I get: > library(Matrix) Erro en loadNamespace(package, c(which.lib.loc, lib.loc), keep.source = keep.source) : in 'Matrix' methods specified for export, but none defined: BIC, anova, coef, confint, deviance, fitted, fixef, formula, head, lmer, logLik, mcmcsamp, plot,

When weighted.residuals() is given a fitted model object with several responses (class mlm) and some zero weights it returns a vector instead of a matrix. It looks like it is doing resids[ weights != 0 ] instead of resids[ weights != 0, , drop=FALSE] in the multi-response case. E.g., > d4 <- data.frame(y1=1:4, y2=2^(0:3), wt=log(1:4), fac=LETTERS[c(1,1,2,2)]) > fit <-

The methods package ?cbind2 includes the instruction to use via methods:::bind_activation(TRUE). This changes the default definition of cbind globally, disrupting proper evaluation in packages not using cbind2. Is cbind2 a hold-over from a time when ... could not be used for dispatch? What is a safe way for a package to use cbind2? This came up in the context of complex package dependencies

Using the Matrix package, how can I create a row-oriented sparse Matrix from scratch populated with some data? By default a column-oriented one is created and I'm aware of the note that the package is optimized for column-oriented ones, but I'm only interested in using it for holding my sparse row-oriented data and doing basic subsetting by rows (even using drop=FALSE). Here is what I

Hi Michael, I've tested your change in r67699 (using r67773) and the function now correctly dispatches to r/cbind2 within the R-session without bind_activation(TRUE). However, running unit tests using R CMD check I figured out that the same function call delegates to r/cbind.matrix (function uses S4 class as first- and matrix as second argument). Is this a bug and/or how can I get function

>>>>> "AS" == Abby Spurdle >>>>> on Wed, 22 Jul 2020 00:28:12 +1200 writes: >> "No documentation for ?sparse.model.matrix? in >> specified packages and libraries", but it's there after >> "library(Ecfun)". I find that interesting, because "Matrix" does not >> appear in the Ecfun