similar to: R.DLL mapping by P/Invoke

Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches similar to: "R.DLL mapping by P/Invoke"

2007 Oct 17
0
Using R.dll in .NET IPC
Hi - I wrapped R.dll up using somebody code online (see below). I am comparing R on .NET IPC with R(D)COM. I got it all working. Except, I realize that in my client code of the IPC remoting, if I call 'plot' function in R via EvaluateNoReturn, I don't seem to see any results on the R plot window (although the window pops up). Is there anything to do with the code of R.dll wrapper
2010 Apr 09
1
Theora encoder directshow Filter configuration
Hi, I'am using the Xiph Theora Encoder directshow Filter in a csharp application. It works fine but I would like to modify the configuration, like the quality settings. I would like to know if there is a possibility to configure it programmatically without using the propertyPage dialog. Thanks a lot for your help Mathieu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was
2010 Apr 06
1
ITheoraEncodeSettings C# interop
My apologies if this is considered somewhat off-topic but I presume that this information may be may also be of use to others using these filters. Is there someone with a better understanding of COM than I have who can tell me where I'm going wrong with the following C# interface definition? I can set and recover a quality setting using this interface but not the isUsingQualityMode flag. Not
2005 Dec 12
7
possible opera+prototype bug in evalscripts?
Hi all, I use the ajax updater with evalscripts=true. When I load HTML with included <script> tags, I get this error in Opera 8.51: ------------------- snip ----------------------------- http://ccml.uni-weimar.de/ Timeout thread: delay 10 ms Error: name: EvalError message: Statement on line 258: Illegal use of eval Backtrace: Line 258 of linked script
2009 May 06
3
[LLVMdev] Pointer vs. integer: backend troubles
Hi everyone, I am currently working on a backend for the TriCore architecture. Unfortunately, I have hit an issue with LLVM's internal representation that's giving me a bit of a headache. The problem is that LLVM assumes that a pointer is equivalent to a machine-word sized integer. This implies that all pointer arithmetic takes place in the CPU's general-purpose registers and is done
2006 Jan 29
0
BUG in PROTOTYPE when set evalScripts: true - Firefox crashes
Hi all. I''m using Ajax Updater with evalScripts set to true and there must be a bug in prototype because when I call function firefox crashes and exit. I can''t even see Firefox javascript console. So I try it under Opera and Opera javascript Console show me this: http://localhost:8090/mysite/processSearch?pQuery=a Timeout thread: delay 10 ms Error: name: EvalError message:
2018 Aug 08
2
Passing arguments to var args function
Hey, I am working on a new back-end, in my back end, I require to pass every argument through a register when calling a function, unless the argument is part of the ellipsis (...) and then pass it through the stack, I've tried creating a CCCustom function to analyze the operands when a function has var args, however, the information whether the out val is fixed or not is not passed into the
2013 May 09
0
[LLVMdev] Backend calling convention: when pointer differs from integer
Hi, I am developing a backend for an architecture with two diferent sets of registers. The ABI specifies that pointer arguments use one kind of registers while integers use the other one. As LLVM translates pointers to the specified type (i32 in my case), I cannot specify the correct calling convention. I've seen that developing the TriCore backend the same issue appeared. In TriCore
2018 Aug 08
2
Passing arguments to var args function
Hey Tim, thanks for the quick answer, this looks exactly like what I was trying to achieve, I was hoping there was something more clean, I was wondering how the community would accept a change in the TD, if the code at CallinvConvLower.cpp:138 would've passed the IsFixed flag to the AssignFn then all those workarounds wouldn't be needed, this example is only one of a few I can think of for
2007 Aug 09
1
[LLVMdev] Tail call optimization thoughts
Implementing tail call opt could look like the following: 0.)a fast calling convention (maybe use the current CallingConv::Fast, or create a CallingConv::TailCall) 1.) lowering of formal arguments like for example x86_LowerCCCArguments in stdcall mode we need to make sure that later mentioned CALL_CLOBBERED_REG is not used (remove it from available registers in callingconvention for