Displaying 20 results from an estimated 40000 matches similar to: "Documentation: add a bit note (PR#9066)"
2014 Mar 18
0
Writing R Extensions: clarification/modification request
Hello R-core developers,
The upcoming release of R-3.1.0 is exciting, especially the support
structure changes for c++11!
But, just the other day I encountered an issue with the package
creation tools within Rcpp and Dirk referred me to 'Writing R
Extensions' [footnote 13] along with the comment that `.hpp` file
extensions are "verboten" on CRAN and then proceeded to find
2006 Sep 16
1
PHP Markdown Extra 1.1b1
Along with the new release of PHP Markdown 1.0.2b7 comes this new
version of PHP Markdown Extra. It contains every improvements of PHP
Markdown 1.0.2b7 plus some new fixes and two new features. You can
download it here:
<http://www.michelf.com/docs/projets/php-markdown-extra-1.1b1.zip>
and you can test it on the PHP Markdown Dingus (select PHP Markdown
Extra):
2011 Feb 03
1
"hubers" function in R MASS library : problem and solution
Hello:
I found the "hubers" function in MASS library is NOT working on the following
data:
> a <-
2006 Sep 20
1
possible bug in PHP Markdown implementation of footnotes, as well as request for standardized XHTML output
I am glad to see support for footnotes working its way into other
implementations of Markdown!
However, I have a couple of issues.
Issue # 1. There appears to be a bug in the footnote parser that
causes material following the footnote to be included as part of the
footnote. For example:
< Example Section >
## Metadata ##
First, take a look at the overall structure of the document.
2008 Mar 10
3
Only 5 tests out of 376 currently failing!
Good news! SuperRedCloth is down to just five failing tests! I was
down to 10 or so in mid-February but then I added test cases from
"The official reference manual for Textile 2", which added 97 new
tests, many of them failing. I''m happy to say, they''re almost all
passing now.
Four of these last five I just need to check with you on before I
deviate from
2007 Jul 03
0
PHP Markdown 1.0.1g & Extra 1.1.3
This is a bug-fix release for PHP Markdown and PHP Markdown Extra.
It's almost identical to version 1.0.2b8, minus the new features
introduced in the 1.0.2 betas (shortcut links, markdown attribute
support for plain PHP Markdown), plus a few minor improvements. You
can download PHP Markdown & Extra from the project page:
<http://www.michelf.com/projects/php-markdown/>
Here
2007 May 21
0
PHP Markdown 1.0.2b8 & Extra 1.1.3b1
Bug fixes for PHP Markdown & Extra, available as beta version for
now. You can download them from these URLs.
<http://www.michelf.com/docs/projets/php-markdown-1.0.2b8.zip>
<http://www.michelf.com/docs/projets/php-markdown-extra-1.1.3b1.zip>
One noticeable change in these releases is that PHP Markdown now
outputs numeric character references for escaped characters (like
2003 Nov 14
0
documentation of "scope": possible error + cleanup (PR#5095)
Full_Name: Hsiu-Khuern Tang
Version: 1.8.0
OS: Debian GNU/Linux unstable
Submission from: (NULL) (156.153.255.243)
While reading the R lang info pages, I came across the following
paragraphs in the node "Scope":
>> A simple example,
>>
>> f <- function(x) {
>> y <- 10
>> g <- function(x) x + y
>> return(g)
2024 Sep 09
0
Documentation cross references
Hi all,
I am checking the cross references at CRAN and base R, and I am having
trouble understanding how to reconcile the documentation and how R
help links work.
Checking the documentation [1] it seems that in a cross reference such
as \link[pkg:x]{text} x should be a topic (created with \alias{topic}
in R documentation).
But I found some cases exploring the output of
tools::base_rdxrefs_db()
2010 Sep 03
2
RFC: Lazy syntax for paragraphs, blockquotes and lists
Hi everybody,
it was requested that kramdown (a Markdown parser in Ruby, see
<http://kramdown.rubyforge.org>) supports the lazy syntax of Markdown.
So I sat down, thought about it, skimmed through the Markdown ML on
issues regarding lazy indentation as done with Markdown and now I have
some rough idea on how to do this in kramdown.
First: I'd like to say that there is no way to satisfy
2007 Jun 29
1
Speeding up :dependent => :destroy
I have a tree of models that represent a book. Looks like this:
book
sections
documents
paragraphs
index entries
glossary entries
footnotes
index entries
glossary entries
These are all models with has_many from parent and the child has
belongs_to. They also all have dependent => :destroy
2003 Dec 09
1
documentation fixes (cvs) (PR#5632)
The patch below attempts to correct some unclear sentences in the R
documentation.
In the case of coplot.Rd it wasn't clear whether "shingle" bar had a
special meaning or was a typo for "single". I've just put a comment in
that case.
regards
--
Brian Gough
Network Theory Ltd -- Publishing Free Software Manuals
15 Royal Park
Bristol BS8 3AL
United Kingdom
Tel: +44
2007 May 18
1
Cannot install rsprng package (PR#9697)
<<insert bug report here>>
I cannot install the R package "rsprng" with the following error message:
> install.packages("rsprng")
trying URL 'http://www.stathy.com/cran/src/contrib/rsprng_0.3-4.tar.gz'
Content type 'application/x-tar' length 35934 bytes
opened URL
==================================================
downloaded 35Kb
* Installing
2006 Feb 10
1
R CMD build: "Subdirectory 'R' contains invalid file names"
Hi, I get
* excluding invalid files from 'R.oo'
Subdirectory 'R' contains invalid file names:
attachLocally.Object.Rex Exception.Rex extend.default.Rex
InternalErrorException.reportBug.Rex Package.Rex Person.Rex Rdoc.Rex
setMethodS3.Rex StaticFields.Rex
when running R CMD build in R v2.3.0 devel. I do understand what is
going on. In my *.R files I keep so called Rdoc
2003 Sep 25
1
Documentation of ``Extract'' re. drop argument (PR#4297)
Problem:
?Extract
does not clearly state that the `drop' argument can only be used in
subscripting, but not in subassigning.
Example:
x <- t(1:10)
x
[,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6] [,7] [,8] [,9] [,10]
[1,] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
x[,1:5,drop=F] <- 10:14
Error: incorrect number of subscripts
but
x[,1:5] <- 10:14
x
[,1] [,2] [,3] [,4]
2006 Jan 14
2
Section 7.1 HML documentation (PR#8484)
Full_Name: Greg Kochanski
Version: 2.2.0
OS: Debian Linux i686
Submission from: (NULL) (212.159.16.190)
In /usr/share/doc/r-doc-html/manual/R-data.html (at least that's where
it is on Debian...) the documentation is unclear. Comments below.
The paragraph has unclear references, and I have no idea what
it actually means.
>> Base R comes with some facilities to communicate via BSD
2008 Mar 12
0
[LLVMdev] Language lawyer question
On Mar 11, 2008, at 10:52 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote:
>> I think the test case is bogus in terms of language correctness,
>
> Why?
My gut. I listen to my gut. More seriously, C99 section 6.2.6.1
paragraph 6 has:
> When a value is stored in an object of structure or union type,
> including in a member
> object, the bytes of the object representation that correspond to
2005 Aug 24
1
Typo(s) in proc.time.Rd and comment about ?proc.time (PR#8091)
I just downloaded the file
ftp://ftp.stat.math.ethz.ch/Software/R/R-devel.tar.gz
and within proc.time.Rd, the second paragraph of the \value
section contains a typo:
The resolution of the times will be system-specific; it is common for
them to be recorded to of the order of 1/100 second, and elapsed [...]
^^^^^
I'd say replacing "to
2023 Feb 05
1
R2HTML doesn't split paragraphs originating from \Sexpr[results=rd]
Hello,
Here's an example that renders correctly using Rd2txt / Rd2latex / R
CMD Rd2pdf, but has problems under Rd2HTML:
\name{foo}
\title{foo}
\section{foo}{
This should be on a separate paragraph
This should be on a separate paragraph
This should be on a separate paragraph
\Sexpr[stage=render,results=rd]{
paste(
rep('Sexpr: This should be on a separate
2005 Aug 24
1
Typo(s) in proc.time.Rd and comment about ?proc.time (PR#8092)
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 Weigand.Stephen at mayo.edu wrote:
> I just downloaded the file
>
> ftp://ftp.stat.math.ethz.ch/Software/R/R-devel.tar.gz
>
> and within proc.time.Rd, the second paragraph of the \value
> section contains a typo:
I believe your understanding of the English language is different from the
author here, who is English. (You on the other hand seem to think