similar to: R-devel and PGI 6.0 compile error

I am trying to compile R-2.3.0 (both first release and patched 2006-05-10) on Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 3 (Taroon Update 7) using the Portland Group compiler version 6.1 and the notes from Jennifer Lai on p33 of "R Installation and Administration" version 2.3.0 (2006-04-24). I have not used this compiler before, so it is possible things are messed up more than usual, even

Hi All, While attempting to build R-patched using the Portland Group compiler suite on our dual Opteron 250 box running Scyld 29cz5 (based on RH, kernel 2.4.29), I get: make[5]: Leaving directory `/home/andy/Rbuild/R221-pgi/src/library/tools/src' make[5]: Entering directory `/home/andy/Rbuild/R221-pgi/src/library/tools/src' pgcc -I../../../../include -I/include -I/include/CC -fpic

Dear R-devel, [I'm not sure if this is appropriate for R-devel. If not, I'm more than happy to move it to R-help.] As those of you who saw my post on R-help know, I've been trying to build R-patched on a dual Opteron box running Scyld Beowulf, using the PGI 6.1 compilers. The build went fine, but I couldn't get it to pass make check-all. Jennifer Lai, who reported success with

Hi, I followed this message, https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2004-February/028942.html, to compile ATLAS with gcc and g77 on AMD Opteron. I then followed the instructions on this message, https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2004-February/028966.html, to convert static libraries to dynamic libraries. However, when I tried to configure R-devel, I got the following error

Hi, Can anyone advise me on how to compile R with Portland Group compiler on a Opeteron machine with Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS release 4 installed? I've edit config.site file to pick portland group compilers instead of gcc. Here is the list of modified flags: CC=/usr/pgi/linux86-64/6.0/bin/pgcc CFLAGS='-g -O2' CPPFLAGS='-I/usr/pgi/linux86-64/6.0/include

Full_Name: Mike Pacey Version: 2.6.0 OS: SuSe Linux 9.3 x86_64 Submission from: (NULL) (194.80.32.10) A "vanilla" version of R configures and compiles without a problem on my system. Switching to using the PGI compiler configures correctly (see the values at the bottom fo thismessage), but compilation aborts with: pgcc -I../../src/extra/zlib -I../../src/extra/bzip2

Hi, I built R with Portland Group compiler, but I noticed one thing that when I ran configure for the first time on AMD machine, I got the following error: checking whether the C compiler works... configure: error: cannot run C compiled programs. If you meant to cross compile, use `--host'. See `config.log' for more details. so I tried to set host=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu,

I am working on a SLES 10 cluster with R available on it. To better use my resources, I want to use Rmpi, but I am having a difficult time installing it. I have set the $R_LIBS variable correctly. The MPI libraries are available through the PGI compiler, but this R instance was compiled with GCC. The Rmpi package can be compiled and installed with %R CMD INSTALL Rmpi_0.5-5.tar.gz

With R-rc_2010-10-11_r53297.tar.gz I am getting ... ** building package indices ... ** testing if installed package can be loaded Error in dyn.load(file, DLLpath = DLLpath, ...) : unable to load shared object '/home/mfa/gilp/toolchain/R/src/R-rc/library/cluster/libs/cluster.so': /home/mfa/gilp/toolchain/R/src/R-rc/library/cluster/libs/cluster.so: undefined symbol: cl_daisy_

I installed R-2.3.1 and ran make check without problem, but I am having trouble installing several packages using gcc (GCC) 3.2.3 20030502 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-53) on Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 3 (Taroon Update 7) Kernel 2.4.21-40.ELsmp on an x86_64 Below are the messages from MCMCpack. Perhaps my systems are messed up? Paul Gilbert > install.packages("MCMCpack")

I am trying to compile R 1.6.1 with gcc 3.2 on Solaris (Sun OS 5.8) and configure gives me: checking whether g77 and gcc agree on int and double... configure: WARNING: g77 and gcc disagree on int and double configure: error: Maybe change CFLAGS or FFLAGS? Complete output from configure is below. I am not setting CFLAGS or FFLAGS, but can someone suggest what I should set them to (or is this some

Hi, i'm trying to compile R on a Cray XT3 using pgi/7.2.1 - CNL (compute node linux) The R version is 2.8.0 this is the option -enable-R-static-lib=yes --disable-R-shlib CPICFLAGS=fpic FPICFLAGS=fpic CXXPICFLAGS=fpic SHLIB_LDFLAGS=shared --with-x=no SHLIB_CXXLDFLAGS=shared --disable-BLAS-shlib CFLAGS="-g -O2 -Kieee" FFLAGS="-g -O2 -Kieee" CXXFLAGS="-g -O2

> From: Prof Brian Ripley [mailto:ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk] > > On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Liaw, Andy wrote: > > > Dear R-devel, > > > > I'm trying to compile R-1.9.0beta (2004-03-31) with the PGI > compilers > > (15-day free evaluation: after the 15 days the binaries > will stop working). > > I'm running into some problems, that I hope some can

Hello! I am updating to the R-devel version as of 2/28 and recompiling with OpenBLAS. I got that to compile nicely. I am now updating a package that uses the OpenBLAS and the PGI compiler, which has changed too. I just changed the path names in Makevars. Here is the Makevars file. FC= d:/PGI/win64/18.10/bin/pgf90 F77= d:/PGI/win64/18.10/bin/pgf90 CC = d:/PGI/win64/18.10/bin/pgcc FFLAGS=

For those interested: I compiled R-1.9.0beta_2004-04-02 with pgf77/gcc/g++ and g77/gcc/g++, both _without_ fast BLAS. Both passed make check-all. Simple crossprod(m) for fairly large `m' shows that the version compiled with pgf77 is about 15% faster: [andy@leo:scratch]% echo "set.seed(1); m <- matrix(runif(5e7), 1e4); gc(); system.time(crossprod(m))" | R-1.9.0-PGI/bin/R

Hi, Has anyone had any luck in using portland group compiler to build R(-devel) with AMD's pgi compiled ACML library? I've downloaded the packages and set LD_LIBRARY_PATH, and run configuration script as follow: % ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/R.pgcc --with-blas='-lacml' However, it failed to pick up double complex BLAS, checking for sgemm_ in -lacml... yes checking

I'm having trouble making todays development snapshot: -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -g -O2 -c stirlerr.c -o stirlerr.o stirlerr.c:34: conflicting types for `Rf_stirlerr' ../../src/include/R_ext/Mathlib.h:557: previous declaration of `Rf_stirlerr' make[3]: *** [stirlerr.o] Error 1 [20] /home/mfa5/gilp/R-versions/R-devel : uname -a SunOS mfa99579 5.6 Generic_105181-11 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10

This may be a tad O.T., but I have to ask somebody. In compiling WRF model, everything seems to build but at runtime, I get this error message: real.exe: /usr/pgi/linux86-64/6.0/lib/libpthread.so.0: version `GLIBC_2.3.3' not found (required by /lib64/tls/librt.so.1) There appears to be something missing from the library, but not being smart enough to know what each one provides, nor know

Hi, we have installed R-2.8.1 using the current pgi compiler (8.0.2) for AMD64 on a SLES9 system. When I try to install "Matrix" everything is fine until the last step. make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/R.INSTALL.TW3399/Matrix/src/AMD' pgCC -L/usr/lib64 -L/usr/X11R6/lib64 -pgf90libs -o Matrix.so CHMfactor.o Csparse.o TMatrix_as.o Tsparse.o init.o Mutils.o chm_common.o

Hi all, I'm using my own front-end that generates LLVM debug info metadata. I was using LLVM 2.9 debug version and I'm moving to LLVM 3.2 debug version of metadata. On my example I got llc 3.2 to fail on following assertion: llc: /work1/tools/llvm/3.2/sources/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfDebug.cpp:1471: void llvm::DwarfDebug::endFunction(const llvm::MachineFunction*): Assertion `TheCU