similar to: Documentation for taper in spec.taper (PR#8871)

Hello! I tried to contact author of the package, but I got no reply. That is why I write it here. This might be useful for those who were using cts for spectral analysis of non-uniformly spaced data. In file spec.ls.R from cts_1.0-1.tar.gz lines 59-60 are written as pgram[k, i, j] <- 0.5 * ((sum(x[1:length(ti)]* cos(2 * pi * freq.temp[k] * (ti - tao))))^2/sum((cos(2 * pi * freq.temp[k] *

Hi everyone, first of all, I would like to say that I am a newbie in R, so I apologize in advance if my questions seem to be too easy for you. Well, I'm looking for periodicity in histograms. I have histograms of certain phenomenons and I'm asking whether a periodicity exists in these data. So, I make a periodogram with the function spec.pgram. For instance, if I have a histogram h, I

hello, I have been using the per function in package longmemo to obtain a simple raw periodogram. I am considering to switch to the function spec.pgram since I want to be able to do tapering. To compare both I used spec.pgram with the options as suggested in the documentation of per {longmemo} to make them correspond. Now I have found on a variety of examples that there is a shift between

Hi, I am far from experienced in both R and time series hence the question. The code for spec.pgram() seems to involve a circularity of the kernel (see below) yielding new power estimates to all frequencies computed by FFT. " if (!is.null(kernel)) { for (i in 1:ncol(x)) for (j in 1:ncol(x)) pgram[, i, j] <- kernapply(pgram[, i, j], kernel, circular = TRUE)

I am trying to load a .so file and get the following error message: > dyn.load("taper.so",local=F) Error in dyn.load(x, as.logical(local), as.logical(now)) : unable to load shared library "/home/hpc1367/runs/taper/taper.so": ld.so.1: /usr/local/lib/R/bin/R.bin: fatal: relocation error: file /home/hpc1367/runs/taper/taper.so: symbol f90_init: referenced symbol not

Dear all, This is potentially a bug in spec.pgram, when the number of samples is odd,spec.pgramreturns a different result withfast = TRUE, the example below contains the two varieties with a reference spectrum calculated manually. the number of returned spectra is also larger (50 compared to 49) whenfast = TRUE x <- rnorm( 99 ) plot(spec.pgram(x, taper = 0 , detrend = FALSE , plot =

Hello, I propose two small changes to spec.pgram to get modest speedup when dealing with input (x) having multiple columns. With plot = FALSE, I commonly see ~10-20% speedup, for a two column input matrix and the speedup increases for more columns with a maximum close to 45%. In the function as it currently exists, only the upper right triangle of pgram is necessary and pgram is not returned by

Dear R-Help, I wish to simulate a process so that it has certain properties in the frequency domain. What I attempted was to generate a random time-series signal, use spec-pgram(), apply a function in the frequency domain, and then inverse transform back to the time-domain. This idea does not seem as straight forward in practice as I anticipated. e.g. x<-ts(rnorm(1000, 0,1), frequency=256)

Dear list, What on earth is spec.pgram() normalized too? If you would like to skip my proof as to why it's not normed too the mean squared or sum squared amplitude of the discrete function a[], feel free too skip the rest of the message. If it is, but you know why it's not exact in spec.pgram() when it should be, skip the rest of this message. The issue I refer herein refers only too a

Dear Prof Ripley, First of all, unless you are an english professor, then I do not think you have any business policing language. I'm still very much a student, both in R, and regarding signal analysis. My competence on the subject as compared too your own level of expertise, or my spelling for that matter, may be a contension for you, but it would have been better had you kept that opinion

Can someone explain me this spec.pgram effect? Code: period.6<-c(0,0,0,0,0,10,0,0,0,0,0,10,0,0,0,0,0,10,0,0,0,0,0,10,0,0,0,0,0,10 ,0,0,0,0,0,10,0,0,0,0,0,10,0,0,0,0,0,10,0,0,0,0,0,10,0,0,0,0,0,10) period.5<-c(0,0,0,0,0,10,0,0,0,0,10,0,0,0,0,0,0,10,0,0,0,0,10,0,0,0,0,0,0,10 ,0,0,0,0,10,0,0,0,0,0,0,10,0,0,0,0,10,0,0,0,0,0,0,10,0,0,0,0,10,0) par(mfrow=c(2,1))

Dear R users I have a really simple question (hoping for a really simple answer :-): Having estimated the spectral density of a time series "x" (heart rate data) with: x.pgram <- spectrum(x,method="pgram") I would like to compute the power in a specific energy band. Assuming that frequency(x)=4 (Hz), and that I am interested in the band between f1 and f2, is the

Time Series functions in R ========================== I think a good basic S-like functionality for library(ts) in base R would include ts class, tsp, is.ts, as.ts plot methods start end window frequency cycle deltat lag diff aggregate filter spectrum, spec.pgram, spec.taper, cumulative periodogram, spec.ar? ar -- at least univariate by Yule-Walker arima -- sim, filter, mle, diag, forecast

Hi list, Does anyone know if there is a library in R that does MTM-SVD method for spectral analysis? Thanks ----- Yasir H. Kaheil Columbia University -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Spectral-analysis-with-mtm-svd-Multi-Taper-Method-Combined-with-Singular-Value-Decomposition-tp21671934p21671934.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Dear R-user and -programmer, has one R-package the ability to compute smoothed periodograms of time series using the Tukey-window and/or the Parzen-window? In the ts- and tseries-packages I have found only Daniell-smoothers. With many thanks in advance for any hint Albrecht Kauffmann -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read

For the command 'spectrum' I read: The spectrum here is defined with scaling 1/frequency(x), following S-PLUS. This makes the spectral density a density over the range (-frequency(x)/2, +frequency(x)/2], whereas a more common scaling is 2? and range (-0.5, 0.5] (e.g., Bloomfield) or 1 and range (-?, ?]. Forgive my ignorance but I am having a hard time interpreting this. Does this mean

There is now a preliminary version of a time series package in the R-devel snapshots, and we would welcome feedback on it. It is based in part on the packages bats (Martyn Plummer) and tseries (Adrian Trapletti) and in part on code I had or have written. (Thanks for the contributions, Martyn and Adrian!) Some of the existing ts code has been changed, for example to plot multiple time series, so

So far I have figured out that the following line reads our time series files into R OK. dtLs$dta <- read.table("C:/TryRRead/datFiles/JFeqfi4h.rta", header = TRUE, sep = ",", colClasses = "character") But I have to remove a main-title line so that the first line is the column titles line. This leads to having two sets of data files around when we would rather

I'm in teaching mode, kernel densities. {History: density() was newly introduced in version 0.15, 19 Dec 1996; most probably by Ross or Robert } When I was telling the students about different kernels (and why their choice is not so important, and "equivalent bandwidths" etc,etc) I wondered about the "Cosine" in my teaching notes which is defined there as k(x)

Dear R helpers I have a daily rainfall dataset of 5 stations, but the time-series are of different lengths. Three stations measured precipitation from 1917 to 2004, one from 1930 to 1979, and other from 1975 to 1998. I'd like to know how to analyse if rainfall is similiar at all stations. Is it possible to compare time-series like these? Best Regards!