similar to: combn(n, k, ...) and all its re-inventions

Hi The message occurred from R, when I was selected of "optimization > block diagonal Fhiser matrix" and used the attached file on PFIM. Could you please advise me about the following message? ***************************** Loading required pakage: combinat Attaching package:'combinat' The following object(s) are masked from 'package:utils':combn

Dear developeRs, I encounter the following problem: in the current version of my package FrF2, certain calls to a functioni do not work when package combinat is loaded, because function combn from combinat masks the function from utils that my package uses. I tried to solve this issue by importing function combn into the namespace of FrF2; I don't need to export it, I just want to use it

Hi, i am working on a problem where i need to compute the products of all possible combinations of size m of the elements of a vector. I know that this can be achieved using the function combn(), e.g.: > vector <- 1:6 > combn(x = vector, m = 3, FUN = function(y) prod(y)) In my case the vector has 2000 elements and i need to compute the values specified above for m = 32. Using combn() i

Hello all, I am trying to create a matrix of 1s and -1s without any repetitions for a specified number of columns. e.g. 1s and -1s for 3 columns can be done uniquely in 2^3 ways. -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 1 -1 1 -1 -1 1 1 1 -1 -1 1 -1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 1 and for 4 columns in 2^4 ways and so on. I finally used the function combn([0 1],3) that I found at the following link

Dear All, I have a dataframe made up of individual beetles consisting of individual number, family number, mother's family number, father's family number, and sex of the beetle. I would like to pair up the individuals for breeding. I would, however, like to avoid breeding beetles of the same sex (obviously), the same family, and with the same mother's family or father's family,

Respected All, I hope you are enjoying good health, I am tring to write a program in R but could not be very sucessful. My program draws random sample form bivariate normal distribution and then compute a variable PIJ. For certian samples some entries of variable PIJ is apearing as negative, which result in negative variance estimator. I want to introduce a loop in my program that verify the each

Hi Folks, Given a series of n independent Bernoulli trials with outcomes Yi (i=1...n) and Prob[Yi = 1] = Pi, I want P = Prob[sum(Yi) = r] (r = 0,1,...,n) I can certainly find a way to do it: Let p be the vector c(P1,P2,...,Pn). The cases r=0 and r=n are trivial (and also are exceptions for the following routine). For a given value of r in (1:(n-1)), library(combinat) Set <- (1:n)

I've created a .Rd file (below), then converted that to .sgml using R CMD Rdconv --type=Ssgm combn.Rd > combn.sgml The output (shown below) is missing some of the sections: arguments seealso examples If instead I convert to .d (below), the same sections are missing, and the "note" section is included but without the necessary newline.

Dear list, I have come across this issue: combn(letters[1:5], 3) [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6] [,7] [,8] [,9] [,10] [1,] "a" "a" "a" "a" "a" "a" "b" "b" "b" "c" [2,] "b" "b" "b" "c" "c" "d" "c"

This is a 'rather than re-invent the wheel' post. Has anyone out there re-written combn so that it can be parallelized - with multicore, snow, or otherwise? I have a job that requires large numbers of combinations, and rather than get all of the index values, then crank it through mclapply, I was wondering if there was a way to just do this natively within a function. Just curious.

Hi, I am trying to use a vector of indices to select some rows from a matrix. But before I can do that I somehow need to convert 'combinations' into a list, since 'mode(combinations)' says it's 'numerical'. Any idea how I can do that? library("combinat") combinations <- t(combn(8,2)) indices <- c(sample(1:length(combinations),10)) # convert ???

Hello! I've a problem with the combn function and a set of vector. I would like to make a simple combination where, instead of scalars, i would like to combine vector, in order to form matrixes. In other words, i have nineteen 6-items vectors (for example coef1-coef19), that i would like to combine in n!/k!(n-k)! 6x6 matrixes. I tried with a code like this mma <-

Dear list, I want to apply the "table" function to every pair of variables in df and the return should be a list. setwd(123) asd <- data.frame(a1=sample(1:4, 20, replace=TRUE), a2=sample(1:4, 20, replace=TRUE), a3=sample(1:4, 20, replace=TRUE), a4=sample(1:4, 20, replace=TRUE)) with(asd, table(a1, a2)) with(asd, table(a1,

I have a problem where I need to loop over the total combinations of vectors (combined once chosen via combinatorics). Here is a simplification of the problem: STEP 1: Define three vectors a, b, c. STEP 2: Combine all possible pairwise vectors (i.e., 3 choose 2 = 3 possible pairs of vectors: ab,ac, bc) NOTE: the actual problem has 8 choose 4, 8 choose 5 and 8 choose 6 combinations. STEP

http://www.nabble.com/file/p15359204/test.data.csv http://www.nabble.com/file/p15359204/test.data.csv test.data.csv Hi, I have used apply to have certian combinations, but when I try to use these combinations I get the error [Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : object "X.GDAXI" not found]. being a novice I donot understand that after applying combination to the data I cant access

Hello All, I have just installed my R 2.4 (windows) as a test trying to load a data frame and run combn() for each line into another file. How do I do this? data.csv: a,b,c,d 1,2,3.4 g,3,6,t etc x=data.csv, m=3 Thank you Zam _________________________________________________________________________________ This email contains confidential information intended only for the person named

Hi, I was checking the source code to the function combn that "generates all combinations of the elements of 'x' taken 'm' at a time.", because I wished to modify it. I have a doubt about a statement. This is the main loop. ._1 <- 1:1 nmmp1 <- n - m + ._1 while (a[1] != nmmp1) { if (e < n - h) { h <- ._1 e <-

On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 timh at insightful.com wrote: > I've created a .Rd file (below), then converted that to .sgml using > R CMD Rdconv --type=Ssgm combn.Rd > combn.sgml > The output (shown below) is missing some of the sections: > arguments > seealso > examples > If instead I convert to .d (below), the same sections are missing, > and the "note"

> On Nov 1, 2017, at 12:51 PM, Tiby Kantrowitz <tlkantro at gmail.com> wrote: > > The prob package has been archived because it depends upon some other > packages which have issues. > > However, such projects as Introduction to Probability and Statistics in R > depend upon it for learning. There are a few other resources that also use > it. > > Does anyone

Hola! I am programming a class (S3) "symarray" for storing the results of functions symmetric in its k arguments. Intended use is for association indices for more than two variables, for instance coresistivity against antibiotics. There is one programming problem I haven't solved, making an inverse of the index function indx() --- se code below. It could for instance return the