similar to: Force action in package install?

Hi all, I have this code, but the marginal distribution plot doesn?t appear aligned with the left plot. I think could be something about layout or par() mar. The code was programmed by me time ago. Can anyone help me to get the marginal distribution on the center (more higher centered) id.txt Could have this code: 05/01/2016;9335,200195 06/01/2016;9197,400391 07/01/2016;9059,299805

Hi Pedro, As a one-off, you just shove the coordinates around a bit: par(mar=c(11,0,6,6)) barplot(fhist$counts,axes=FALSE, space=0,horiz=TRUE,col="lightgray", ylim=c(0,24)) However, I don't think that this plot illustrates quite what you think it does. Jim On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Pedro p?ramo <percentil101 at gmail.com> wrote: > Please, I'm trying to put

I am building from source on RHEL 4 and have run into a problem while running "make check": running code in 'lapack.R' ...make[3]: *** [lapack.Rout] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/opt/R/R-2.9.1/tests' make[2]: *** [test-Specific] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/opt/R/R-2.9.1/tests' make[1]: *** [test-all-basics] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving

Many thanks Jim. What I,m trying to show with the fhist plot is the empirical distribution of the values of the left plot simulation. You say: However, I don't think that this plot illustrates quite what you think it does. Can you give me a clue to try to illustrate better if it is not showing what I believe it shows a better way to show it? Many thanks in advance. El 7 jun. 2017

Please can you send me some orientation? Many thanks in advance. Only if posible one book o similar example to understand why it is not what I try. El 8 jun. 2017 7:50 PM, "Pedro p?ramo" <percentil101 at gmail.com> escribi?: > Many thanks Jim. > > What I,m trying to show with the fhist plot is the empirical distribution > of the values of the left plot simulation.

Please, I'm trying to put the right plot higher and centered on the left values but I don't achive. I would appreciate so much your help El 6 jun. 2017 22:37, "Pedro p?ramo" <percentil101 at gmail.com> escribi?: > Hi all, > > I have this code, but the marginal distribution plot doesn?t appear > aligned with the left plot. > > > I think could be

Hi Pedro, If you keep that same margins for the second plot: par(mar=c(10,0,6,6)) barplot(fhist$counts,axes=FALSE, space=0,horiz=TRUE,col="lightgray") it looks reasonably well aligned to me. Because you are plotting the counts of the values in Simulation, the ordinate (vertical axis) of the bar plot is in quite different units from that of the plot on the left side. Jim On Wed, Jun

It is very useful to have svn version number encoded in llvm-gcc's -- version output. Here is one approach. Anyone has a better patch ? - Devang Index: Makefile.in =================================================================== --- Makefile.in (revision 53385) +++ Makefile.in (working copy) @@ -802,6 +802,9 @@ DEVPHASE_s := "\"$(if $(DEVPHASE_c),

Full_Name: W.B.Kloke Version: 1.9.1 OS: FreeBSD-5.2.1 Submission from: (NULL) (195.253.16.182) Subject line says it. I had problems installing lme4. 1. The dependency on package Matrix was not resolved (I am not sure that this is really a bug; but it is annoying, anyway). 2. Installing Matrix failed with a message saying something like "no rule for %_D.o" after compiling a lot of

Please can someone explain why I seem to get these contradictory results? choose(5,2) [1] 10 gamma(6)/(gamma(3)*gamma(4)) [1] 10 gamma(6)/(gamma(3)*gamma(4)) == choose(5,2) [1] TRUE # all's well so far. # now look what happens: gamma(21)/(gamma(6)*gamma(16)) == choose(20,5) [1] FALSE # check individual terms: gamma(21)/(gamma(6)*gamma(16)) [1] 15504 choose(20,5) [1] 15504 # so they are the

Dear R users I have started to use gdb for debugging dynloaded C code as described in `Writing R Extensions'. Unfortunately I have run into several problems that I haven't been able to solve: - using `n': how comes that the same line of code appears up to three times (and inbetween the next line and maybe even the second next one?) - using `print' resp. `display': How

Why not set the VERSUFFIX to be " (Based on Apple Inc. build 5555) (LLVM rXXXX)" Where you set the revision number? We currently use LLVM_VERSION_INFO to set this sort of information and to me it makes more sense to have the svn rev number there instead of just saying LLVM build like it does now. -Tanya On Wed, 9 Jul 2008, Devang Patel wrote: > It is very useful to have svn

Dear developers, today I tried to build and install R-devel_2009-01-10 on FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT (i386) for testing purposes. All went well until compiling the now recommended (integrated) Matrix package. At this point the following break occured: ------------------------------------------------ begin installing recommended package Matrix * Installing *source* package 'Matrix' ... **

On Jul 9, 2008, at 6:13 PM, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: > > Why not set the VERSUFFIX to be " (Based on Apple Inc. build 5555) > (LLVM > rXXXX)" > > Where you set the revision number? I do not want to set the revision number in a source file every time I do 'svn update' :) > We currently use LLVM_VERSION_INFO to set this sort of information > and to

Hi This is a question prompted by the mac version of R, but as I see it, it should have broader interest. These days the CRAN Mac binary per default compiles every package for two architectures. First i386 and then ppc. In between the two compilation runs, any object files in pkgname/src is removed. This cleanup is necessary since otherwise Make would not recompile the object files

Why is it that R places CFLAGS after PKG_CFLAGS and not before when compiling a package (e.g. through R CMD build pkg)? This can be problematic if, for instance, you want to use -O3, but -O2 is in R_HOME/etc/Makeconf. If -O2 (in CFLAGS) appears after -O3 (in PKG_CFLAGS), you are left with what you didn't want: -O2. In R-exts, it says that "Flags which are set in file etc/Makeconf

Hi We are currently embedding a rather large C++ library in R (BioC), and we want some comments on the portability of how we have approach this. First of, we are not really able to do much about the portability of the basic library, which of course is the main question :) We have an approach which seems to work, I just want a bit of feedback on it.... The way we integrate it into R is

Hi. I am writing some code in C that I would like to link into R. My Makevars file is: PKG_CPPFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include PKG_LIBS=-L/usr/local/lib -lgsl PKG_CFLAGS = -Wall -O0 -g -p -pg The source file is core.c,. and I am compiling using R CMD SHLIB core.c The output is gcc -arch x86_64 -O3 -g -p -std=gnu99 -I/Library/Frameworks/ R.framework/Resources/include

{message bounced because it has "$$$" in it. manually approved by list maintainer -- MM} > Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 13:03:35 +0100 > From: jens <jniesch at gwdg.de> > > I have trouble to install R on Sparc Sun Solaris 2.6. > make returns the error message: > Undefined symbol first referenced in file > d_lg10 ../appl/libappl.a(uncmin.o) > d_sign

Can you suggest a plot on the right side so that the right plot has the same units of left plot and reflect the counts of the number of time the values repeat, something like the empirical distribution? 2017-06-14 12:30 GMT+02:00 Jim Lemon <drjimlemon at gmail.com>: > Hi Pedro, > If you keep that same margins for the second plot: > > par(mar=c(10,0,6,6)) >