similar to: commercial software selling a R module - question about GPL license rights

Hi there - Is there a way to write statistical models (trees, naïve Bayes, SVM, etc) to a file and import them again without loss of information? Thanks - Ton Ton van Daelen, PhD Director, Application Support Tel: (858) 279-8800 ext 217 Fax: (858) 279-8804 Web: www.scitegic.com Register now for the 2004 Pipeline Pilot user group meeting Jan 28-30 in San Diego:

Hi there - I have been trying to generate some simple stats and save the results to a file. My data looks like this: x y z exp 0 3 5 1 2 11 10 1 4 4 5 1 7 6 4 1 11 1 2 2 5 7 1 2 3 3

John W. Eaton wrote: > On 17-Nov-2004, Philippe Grosjean <phgrosjean at sciviews.org> wrote: > > | - There is no possibility to make a commercial GUI for R (thanks to > | the GPL), > > This is false. Please don't confuse "commercial" (Red Hat > and SuSE GNU/Linux distributions are commercial software) > with "proprietary". > > jwe

Am Mittwoch, den 14.05.2008, 11:27 +0400 schrieb Anton Korobeynikov: > Hello, Razvan > > > after that I use only the Windows interface to it (like any other > > proprietary Windows software does) , GPL forbids me to do that. > That's due to nature of the interface. Binary interface to codec make > the proprietary application 'derived work'. This is what the

On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 23:36 -0700, Chris Lattner wrote: > I don't want to discourage you, but you are basically asking for > interpretation of legal documents... > If you really really need to know the answer to questions like these, > the best bet is to hire legal council. Chris is right. I would add that it sounds like you are already getting nonsense responses. However,

Hi, > If you distribute the GPLed library and the proprietary application > separately, and make sure that they are linked at installation time, the > link step creates a derived work indeed but that's inconsequential > because it isn't redistributed. Interestingly enough, you need a linker at the target system to do that. And guess what this discussion started at :-p Gr.

Hello, Razvan > after that I use only the Windows interface to it (like any other > proprietary Windows software does) , GPL forbids me to do that. That's due to nature of the interface. Binary interface to codec make the proprietary application 'derived work'. > - I didn't find any commercial projects (not Operating Systems or > dual-licensed but simple

I'm looking for an efficient way of removing zero-variance columns from a large matrix. Any suggestions? Thanks, - Moises [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

On May 13, 2008, at 10:04 PM, Razvan Aciu wrote: > Thanks for your replies. This is indeed a helpful mailing list. I > made some > more researches about the licensing issue and this is what I > discovered: > For now, I think for a commercial developer who wants to create a > complete > compiler toolchain using llvm, trying to package its compiler with > GCC is a

> > From: Philippe Grosjean <phgrosjean@sciviews.org> > > However, I was suprised to learn that the Pipeline Pilot R Collection is > not GPL and is not free (in term of money, i.e., you have to pay > 3500$/year to use it). I am not sure, but I think they break the GPL > license here since they use a commercial license for, basically, a > collection of R scripts

I'm using the following command to run R in Windows "Rterm --no-save --no-restore < "Rscriptfile" > "Rstdoutfile" How can I capture the text sent by R to stderr in a file? Thanks, - Moises [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hello, In the latest 'Scientific Computing World' magazine (issue 78, p. 22), there is a review on free statistical software by Felix Grant ("doesn't have to pay good money to obtain good statistics software"). As far as I know, this is the first time that R is even mentioned in this magazine, given that it usually discuss commercial products. In this article, the analysis

Hello, In the latest 'Scientific Computing World' magazine (issue 78, p. 22), there is a review on free statistical software by Felix Grant ("doesn't have to pay good money to obtain good statistics software"). As far as I know, this is the first time that R is even mentioned in this magazine, given that it usually discuss commercial products. In this article, the analysis

Thanks for your replies. This is indeed a helpful mailing list. I made some more researches about the licensing issue and this is what I discovered: - from FSF it seems that packaging together a GPL application and a commercial one it is a corner case of licensing. Here is what they say: http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-faq.html#MereAggregation

I have some images of bugs (insects) with many bugs in each image. I want to count the number of bugs and to have an estimate of the area of each one. I've tried searching for an R package to do so with no success. Is this a task that I should pursue doing in R or should I restrict myself to specific image analysis software (e.g. ImageJ)?. The reason I consider R would be a good choice is

> > 3. It should be from any kind of license free agreement as the > > solution would be sold as a proprietary solution. your solution could include GPL software and still be sold; you would be selling your propprietary configuration of the components, and your support guarantee. Including the source and so on is not something that needs to be played up.

Hello, I am looking for more information about lazy loading introduced in R 2.0.0. Doing ?lazyLoad I got some and there is a 'see also' section that points to 'makeLazyLoading'... But I cannot reach this page. My problem is: I recompiled a library that uses a lot of functions from other libraries (of course I can give details if needed). I load it in my computer: library(svGUI),

Hello, can I use Xapian in a non-free software? ehsan.

Hello, I am trying to understand the licenses around LLVM ecosystem as described in: http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#copyright-license-patents I couldn't figure out if I can write a compiler using the OCaML bindings and redistribute it as GPL. It seems like I can, due to the antivirality of UIUC. It would be also good if the Kaleidoskope example came with using terms, hopefully in

On 2019/06/19, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > The bulk SPDX addition made all these files into GPL-2.0 licensed files. > However the remainder of the project is MIT-licensed, these files > (primarily header files) were simply missing the boiler plate and got > caught up in the global update. > > Fixes: b24413180f5 (License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no