similar to: Calloc : syntax error

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Calloc : syntax error"

2012 Mar 18
2
malloc/calloc/strdup and R's aequivalents
Hello, when looking at "Writing R Extensions" with mem-allocation in mind, I wondered, which functions to use to substitute malloc(), calloc(), realloc() and strdup() and free(). It looked like Calloc() or R_Calloc() might be useful for some of my tasks, but when trying to use R_Calloc() for example, I got some error messages which I don't see where they are coming from. Maybe I
2005 Dec 29
1
Problems with calloc function.
Hi all, I have a C code in Linux, it has 7 pointers and compile e run OK, but when I run in R happens problems with calloc function, it returns NULL. ############################################### > int *temp1,*temp2,*temp3,*temp4; temp1 = (int *)calloc(col,sizeof(int)); if(temp1 == NULL){ printf("\n\n No Memory1!"); exit(1); } temp2 = (int *)calloc(col,sizeof(int));
2024 Aug 13
1
[PATCH] Reorder calloc arguments
Reordering calloc arguments silences gcc compiler warnings of latest versions. Spotted with OpenSSH-portable on a Linux system. Okay? Index: cipher.c =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/ssh/cipher.c,v diff -u -p -u -p -r1.121 cipher.c --- cipher.c 17 May 2024 02:39:11 -0000 1.121 +++ cipher.c 13 Aug 2024 16:46:00 -0000 @@ -249,7 +249,7
2015 Jun 17
2
[PATCH] btrfs: keep calloc and its error message match
commit 3f4ba2e98d21746723d291939ccc2e1f1526aa6d left some error messages unchanged. Signed-off-by: Chen Hanxiao <chenhanxiao@cn.fujitsu.com> --- daemon/btrfs.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/daemon/btrfs.c b/daemon/btrfs.c index 7b14bac..e8059db 100644 --- a/daemon/btrfs.c +++ b/daemon/btrfs.c @@ -479,7 +479,7 @@ do_btrfs_subvolume_list (const
2006 Apr 17
1
[patch] calloc arguments
Hi, it looks like a few users of calloc had their arguments backwards. I checked the other users and they seem fine. Since one of those is in ioemu code, does that mean we (I?) will be submitting that bug to qemu upstream? -- Hollis Blanchard IBM Linux Technology Center Fix swapped calloc() arguments. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> diff -r c4eead8a925b
2015 Aug 27
2
[Mesa-dev] gallium state tracker calls calloc for 0 sizes arrays ?
Hi, On 27-08-15 15:46, Marek Olšák wrote: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> While debugging: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008089 >> >> I made a apitrace recording of the a single slide transition >> animation, and since I suspected memory corruption replayed >> it
2015 Aug 27
2
gallium state tracker calls calloc for 0 sizes arrays ?
Hi All, While debugging: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008089 I made a apitrace recording of the a single slide transition animation, and since I suspected memory corruption replayed it using ElectrFence + glretrace, this finds a 0 sized array allocation at src/mesa/state_tracker/st_glsl_to_tgsi.cpp: 5565: if (proginfo->Parameters) { t->constants = (struct
2009 Nov 03
1
hivex.c: unchecked calloc
Hi Rich, There's an unchecked calloc in hivex.c's hive_open: h->bitmap = calloc (1 + h->size / 32, 1); ... This subsequent deref could cause a segfault: BITMAP_SET (h->bitmap, blkoff);
2015 Aug 27
3
[Mesa-dev] gallium state tracker calls calloc for 0 sizes arrays ?
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 27-08-15 15:46, Marek Olšák wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> >>> wrote: >>>>
2009 Jul 20
3
S_alloc or Calloc for return value
I am trying to write a C function to create a vector of integers that can be used by the R calling function. I do not know the size of the vector in the R calling function. (Well, actually, I have an upper limit on the size, but that is so large that R cannot allocate it. What I'm doing in the function is to do a sieving procedure, and the result will be small enough to fit into my
2009 Nov 03
2
R 2.10.0: Error in gsub/calloc
I'm running R 2.10.0 under Mac OS X 10.5.8; however, I don't think this is a Mac-specific problem. I have a very large (158,908 possible sentences, ca. 58 MB) plain text document d which I am trying to tokenize: t <- strapply(d, "\\w+", perl = T). I am encountering the following error: Error in base::gsub(pattern, rs, x, ...) : Calloc could not allocate (-1398215180 of
2000 Sep 07
1
Calloc() & Free() in different .C(.) calls --> not usable ?
[sending this to R-devel, since it may be of general interest and could possibly lead to better instructions in the "R-exts" manual] Is this another case where only .Call() or .External() [or a fudge factor] solve my problem? Following situation: I use dyn.loaded C code to compute a recursive tree structure from my data. Beforehand I don't know how big the tree will
2020 Jun 07
3
[External] Re: use of the tcltk package crashes R 4.0.1 for Windows
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 5:53 PM <luke-tierney at uiowa.edu> wrote: > > On Sun, 7 Jun 2020, peter dalgaard wrote: > > > So this wasn't tested for a month? > > > > Anyways, Free() is just free() with a check that we're not freeing a null pointer, followed by setting the pointer to NULL. At that point of tcltk.c, we have > > > > for (objc = i = 0;
2020 Jun 07
4
[External] Re: use of the tcltk package crashes R 4.0.1 for Windows
I've committed the change to use Free instead of free in tcltk.c and sys-std.c (r78652 for R-devel, r78653 for R-patched). We might consider either moving Calloc/Free out of the Windows remapping or moving the remapping into header files so everything seeing our header files uses our calloc/free. Either would be less brittle that the current status. Best, luke On Sun, 7 Jun 2020, peter
2015 Jun 18
1
[PATCH] error log: keep more calloc and its error messages match
Signed-off-by: Chen Hanxiao <chenhanxiao@cn.fujitsu.com> --- cat/cat.c | 4 ++-- cat/ls.c | 4 ++-- daemon/md.c | 2 +- daemon/stat.c | 2 +- daemon/xattr.c | 2 +- df/main.c | 4 ++-- edit/edit.c | 4 ++-- fish/fish.c | 6 +++--- fish/options.c | 4 ++-- inspector/inspector.c | 4 ++-- rescue/rescue.c
2015 Jun 17
0
Re: [PATCH] btrfs: keep calloc and its error message match
On Wednesday 17 June 2015 10:44:09 Chen Hanxiao wrote: > commit 3f4ba2e98d21746723d291939ccc2e1f1526aa6d > left some error messages unchanged. That commit was about converting a couple of malloc+memset to calloc, not about replacing messages in other parts. Hence, this note is wrong. > > Signed-off-by: Chen Hanxiao <chenhanxiao@cn.fujitsu.com> > --- > daemon/btrfs.c | 4
2015 Jun 16
1
[PATCH] btrfs: use calloc instead of malloc+memset
Small optimization, and eases the code. --- daemon/btrfs.c | 10 ++++------ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/daemon/btrfs.c b/daemon/btrfs.c index f02acb1..7b14bac 100644 --- a/daemon/btrfs.c +++ b/daemon/btrfs.c @@ -1723,12 +1723,11 @@ do_btrfs_balance_status (const char *path) nlines = count_strings (lines); - ret = malloc(sizeof *ret); + ret = calloc (1,
2003 Dec 05
3
.C() memory allocation
I would like to retrieve a vector of integers from a call to .C(), but I don't know its length in advance. How do I do this without making an ugly safe guess? My vector is called "sequences". I am passing the argument sequences = integer(0) in the call to .C(), then declaring the corresponding argument as int *sequences in my C code. I tried R_alloc()ing the storage in C and
2007 Jan 30
0
calloc bug in RODBC 1.1-7 and later?
I'm trying to load Affy Annotation data from an Access database into R using RODBC. This has worked fine for quite some time. The bug seems to be correlated to RODBC versions 1.1-7 and later. Works fine: R 2.2.0 with RODBC 1.1-4; R 2.3.0 or R 2.4.1 with RODBC 1.1-6 Fails: R 2.3.1 with RDOBC 1.1-7; R 2.4.1 with RODC 1.1-7 or 1.1-8 Details ===== This works fine: Version 2.2.0
2016 Oct 03
3
Default alignment for 'malloc'
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 02:43:03PM +0200, Michael Kruse via llvm-dev wrote: > 2016-10-03 13:55 GMT+02:00 Martin J. O'Riordan via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > > I am trying to implement some new alignment based optimisations in our > > target backend, and I am wondering if there a way a target can specify that > > ‘malloc’, ‘realloc’ and ‘calloc’