similar to: profiling C code

Hey guys, I am trying to speed up some of my LLVM/llc passes. Is there a way to use something like gprof on llc? If not, do you guys know anything that I can use to discover which routines of my passes are taking most of the time? thanks, Fernando

I seem to have run into https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855640, because when I tried the fix/work-around at the end (comment 11), ethtool -K eth0 gro off, my download speed by speedtest went from undetectable to ~150Mb/s. However, it was not able to connect for the upload test, and so something may still be off. Non-virtual machines can do the upload test, so it's not just a

well, the next place to go, if fsck isn't enough would be to to try debugfs(1) man debugfs. On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 8:39 PM, Boylan, Ross <Ross.Boylan@ucsf.edu> wrote: > I guess some of the trouble was that the virtual disk was mounted > read-only at the VM level. When I mounted read/write I was able to do > fsck, which gave messages about replaying the logs and a couple

Ivan, thank you for the tips; they allowed me to move on to the next problems. By building the tar file first and checking it later, and fixing several other problems I got R CMD check to work. It does *not* delete inst/doc. It also does not run boostrap.R, as far as I can tell, presumably because only devtools does. Check within RStudio continues to delete inst/doc, so this behavior is

Howdy. I'm working on Altivec versions of some of the libFLAC functions. I figured the best candidates would be those that had MMX/SSE/3dnow versions, and I picked FLAC__lpc_restore_signal() to do first, since it's relatively simple. In stepping through some runs, it appears that 'order' mod 4 is always 0. Is that guaranteed, either by the format or by higher functions in the

summary(x), where x is the output of lm, produces the expectedd display, including standard errors of the coefficients. summary(x)$coefficients produces a vector (x is r$individual[[2]]): > r$individual[[2]]$coefficients tX(Intercept) tXcigspmkr tXpeld tXsmkpreve mn -2.449188e+04 -4.143249e+00 4.707007e+04 -3.112334e+01 1.671106e-01 mncigspmkr mnpeld

It seems that if an S4 class has no slots it can't be instantiated because it is assumed to be virtual. Is there a way around this other than adding a do-nothing slot? A singleton would be OK, though is not essential. Problem: EmptyFitResult <- setClass("EmptyFitResult", representation=representation()) # also tried it without the second argument. same result. > e <-

? Fri, 3 May 2024 19:45:08 +0000 "Boylan, Ross via R-help" <r-help at r-project.org> ?????: > & $R CMD check . > * checking for file './DESCRIPTION' ... ERROR > Required fields missing or empty: > 'Author' 'Maintainer' You're checking a source package directory. This could work, but it's much easier and more reliable to (1) build

Any recommendations for tools to diagnose and recover problems on an ext4 file system? In particular: root@jessie01:~# mount -o ro /dev/markov02/root /mnt/markov02 mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/mapper/markov02-root, missing codepage or helper program, or other error In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try dmesg | tail or so. and e2fsck

Is there any good source of information on how S4 classes (and methods) work from C? E.g., for reading how to read a slot value how to invoke a method how to test if you have an s4 object For writing, how to make a new instance of an S4 object. I've found scattered hints in the archive, including a link to a talk on this subject "I am using C code to create an S4 object based on

I defined an S4 class with a slot i. Then I wrote a regular function that attempted to increment i. This didn't work, apparently because of the general rule that a function can't change the values of its arguments outside the function. I gather there are ways around it, but the Green book admonishes "cheating on the S evaluation model is to be avoided" (p. 190). Thinking that

I'd like to evaluate a function at each point on a 2 or 3-D grid. Is there some function that already does this, or generates the grid of points? My search has led me to the grid and lattice packages, and I found a reference to the sp package (e.g., SpatialGrid) for this. There are things in there that might be relevant, but at first blush many of them are embedded in other concepts (grobs,

I have a package that can use rmpi, but works fine without it. None of the automatic test code invokes rmpi functionality. (One test file illustrates how to use it, but has quit() as its first command.) What's the best way to handle this? In particular, what is the appropriate form for upload to CRAN? When I omitted rmpi from the DESCRITPION file R CMD check gave <quote> * checking

On the Windows download page the second link is "Installation and other instructions" http://cran.cnr.berkeley.edu/bin/windows/base/README.R-3.1.2. Clicking on this gets me a "download or open as" dialogue rather than a page of text. I think something like this happened a few years ago, and the problem was the MIME type of the link. It would be nice to fix. Thanks. Ross

Full_Name: Ross Boylan Version: 2.2.0 OS: Linux Submission from: (NULL) (65.175.48.58) \eqn{{\bf\beta}_j}{b(j)} in my .Rd file produces this error -------------------------------------------- ! Missing $ inserted. <inserted text> $ l.7 \eqn{{\bf\beta}_j}{\bf\beta}_ jnormal-bracket5bracket-normal{b(j)} -- ! Missing $ inserted. <inserted

Full_Name: Ross Boylan Version: 2.10.0 OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (198.144.201.14) Some of the help for setGeneric seems to have been garbled. In the section "Basic Use", 5th paragraph (where the example counts as a single line 3rd paragraph) it says <quote> Note that calling 'setGeneric()' in this form is not strictly necessary before calling

I've been using virt-manager and kvm with a disk image (as in the raw bits) from a physical windows 7 machine. Initial performance was dreadful, but improved as I switched to virtio and spice. I've been running linux VM's somewhat longer (much longer if you count kvm without libvirt). There are lots of choices exposed by virt-manager. How do I find out what the choices mean, and

Apparently Scheme is clever and can turn certain apparently recursive function calls into into non-recursive evaluations. Does R do anything like that? I could find no reference to it in the language manual. What I'm wondering is whether there are desirable ways to express recursion in R. Thanks. -- Ross Boylan wk: (415) 514-8146 185 Berry St #5700

Over a decade ago there was a problem with model.frame when the variable names were long: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2002-August/024492.html I have similar symptoms with R 2.15.3 on Windows 7: Browse[2]> x <- model.matrix(formula(myform), p$data) Error in model.frame.default(object, data, xlev = xlev) (from mice.R#601) : object is not a matrix My attempt at a work-around

I am trying to package some code that is a tweak to the survival package. When I asked earlier, the list consensus was that it would be best to do this as a separate package, dependent on survival. This is proving a bit tricky. I have some run-time and compile time concerns. Run-time, my R code needs R code from survival, and my C code needs C functions from survival. Will this all be