similar to: identify() bug (PR#8576)

Hi all, I am dealing with a big data frame. When printing something like > allData[[3]] 1 625.364 38.223 21.014 0.216 1.241411 V 1050o 58.38065 -0.06178768 2 383.709 55.811 21.435 0.296 1.241411 V 1050o 58.38308 -0.03328282 3 434.669 58.597 21.207 0.233 1.241411 V 1050o 58.38334 -0.03930350 4 687.306 69.418 20.873 0.171 1.241411 V 1050o 58.38425 -0.06914694 5 759.522

I'm using ocfs2 and all modules from Suse (SLES9), no self compilations. Here are the details: * 32-bit machine (writing to ocfs2 partition/LUN and where the corruption was reported): Kernel: 2.6.5-7.257-bigsmp #1 SMP i686 i386 GNU/Linux OCFS2 rpms: ocfs2console-1.2.1-4.2 ocfs2-tools-1.2.1-4.2 o2cb_ctl -V: o2cb_ctl version 1.2.1 /etc/init.d/o2cb status: Module "configfs":

Hi all, I am trying to install nested Esxi 6.x under a Centos7 kvm host to use it as test lab for new ESXi versions, but I am doing something wrong because I can't install it. I have configured kvm and kvm_intel modules with the following options: options kvm ignore_msrs=1 options kvm_intel nested=1 ept=1 and I add the following options in <cpu> xml guest file: <cpu

On 11/26/15 09:47, C. L. Martinez wrote: > Hi all, > > I am trying to install nested Esxi 6.x under a Centos7 kvm host to > use it as test lab for new ESXi versions, but I am doing something > wrong because I can't install it. > > I have configured kvm and kvm_intel modules with the following options: > > options kvm ignore_msrs=1 > options kvm_intel nested=1

Hello! I would like to use lmer() to fit data, which are some estimates and their standard errors i.e kind of a "meta" analysis. I wonder if weights argument is the right one to use to include uncertainty (standard errors) of "data" into the model. I would like to use lmer(), since I would like to have a "freedom" in modeling, if this is at all possible. For

Dear R helpers I have a data which gives Month-wise and Rating-wise Rates. So the input file is something like month           rating           rate January        AAA             9.04 February      AAA             9.07 .......................................... .......................................... Decemeber     AAA            8.97  January           BBB           11.15 February        

On 11/27/2015 01:32 PM, Patrick Laimbock wrote: > On 11/26/15 09:47, C. L. Martinez wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I am trying to install nested Esxi 6.x under a Centos7 kvm host to >> use it as test lab for new ESXi versions, but I am doing something >> wrong because I can't install it. >> >> I have configured kvm and kvm_intel modules with the

Hi, I need help! I am trying to iterate an iterative process to do cross vadation and store the results each time. I have a Spatial data.frame, called Tmese > str(Tmese) Formal class 'SpatialPointsDataFrame' [package "sp"] with 5 slots ..@ data :'data.frame': 14 obs. of 17 variables: .. ..$ ID : int [1:14] 73 68 49 62 51 79 69 77 57 53 ... .. ..$

Hello, I am doing simulations, and I generate a list at each iteration (with three component matrices in the example below), saving the results in a list. For example, after two iterations, I have something like > str(sim.theta) List of 2 $ :List of 3 ..$ : num [1:6, 1:4] -3.67 -1.07 -2.99 -18.38 -3.26 ... ..$ : num [1:6, 1:6] -7.56 -3.14 -4.99 1.03 2.79 ... ..$ : num [1:6, 1:4]

Colleagues, I am fitting an Emax model using nls. The code is: START <- list(EMAX=INITEMAX, EFFECT=INITEFFECT, C50=INITC50) CONTROL <- list(maxiter=1000, warnOnly=T) #FORMULA <- as.formula(YVAR ~ EMAX - EFFECT * XVAR^GAMMA / (XVAR^GAMMA + C50^GAMMA)) ## alternate version of formula FORMULA <- as.formula(YVAR ~ EMAX - EFFECT / (1 + (C50/XVAR)^GAMMA)) FIT <-

Hi, I am analyzing a data set with greater than 1000 independent cases (collected in an unrestricted manner), where each case has 3 variables associated with it: one, a factor variable with 0/1 levels (called XX), another factor variable with 8 levels (X) and a third response variable with two levels (Y: 0/1). I am trying to see if X1 has an effect on the relationship between X2 and the

On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 15:16 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 14:02 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > > On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 12:30 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > > > Ralf, et al., > > > > > > Attached is the latest version of my autovectorization patch. llvmdev > > > has been CC'd (as had been suggested to me); this e-mail contains > >

We would like to propose a new feature to disable optimizations on IR Functions that are considered “cold” by PGO profiles. The primary goal for this work is to improve code optimization speed (which also improves compilation and LTO speed) without making too much impact on target code performance. The mechanism is pretty simple: In the second phase (i.e. optimization phase) of PGO, we would add

Hello all, I am trying to use the tapply function to sum some values and change the column names of the resulting vector. I input Emp Et 1 10565 ACC 2 7515 ADM 3 625 AGF 4 6243 CNS 5 12721 EDU 6 3924 FIN 7 18140 HLH 8 3686 INF 9 15841 MFG 10 243 MIN 11 1864 MNG 12 4664 OSV 13 5496 PRF 14 4988 PUB 15 2166 REC 16 2153 REL 17 16082 RTL 18 3582 TRN 19 757 UTL 20

On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 12:30 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > Ralf, et al., > > Attached is the latest version of my autovectorization patch. llvmdev > has been CC'd (as had been suggested to me); this e-mail contains > additional benchmark results. > > First, these are preliminary results because I did not do the things > necessary to make them real (explicitly quiet the

On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 14:02 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 12:30 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > > Ralf, et al., > > > > Attached is the latest version of my autovectorization patch. llvmdev > > has been CC'd (as had been suggested to me); this e-mail contains > > additional benchmark results. > > > > First, these are preliminary

I'm getting dmesg flooded with messages like this one: usbdevfs: usb_submit_urb returned -28 What's wrong? I'm using Linux kernel 2.4.32 and nut-2.0.3. The /etc/ups.conf contains [mgeups] driver = newhidups port = auto desc = "MGE UPS" Cheers, Rodrigo -- *** Rodrigo Martins de Matos Ventura <yoda@isr.ist.utl.pt> *** Web page:

Ralf, et al., Attached is the latest version of my autovectorization patch. llvmdev has been CC'd (as had been suggested to me); this e-mail contains additional benchmark results. First, these are preliminary results because I did not do the things necessary to make them real (explicitly quiet the machine, bind the processes to one cpu, etc.). But they should be good enough for discussion.

Friday I enabled the inlinehint function attribute in the inliner. It mostly affects the performance of -Os compiled code. I have made some measurements on the SPEC test suite to show what it means. I made three runs of then nightly tests. The baseline represents -Os with no inlinehint: make TEST=nightly OPTFLAGS=-Os EXTRA_LOPT_OPTIONS=-inlinehint-threshold=0

Dear all, I have been trying to connect a usb external disk to a Windows Server 2008 guest through Xen 3.2. The guest is working properly and its .cfg file is: ******************************************* import os, re arch = os.uname()[4] if re.search(''64'', arch): arch_libdir = ''lib64'' else: arch_libdir = ''lib'' kernel =