similar to: configure on solaris 2.9 with non GNU compilers (PR#8300)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "configure on solaris 2.9 with non GNU compilers (PR#8300)"

2005 Nov 09
0
Compiling R on Sparc-Solaris-2.9
Hi, all! I'm trying to compile R on a Solaris machine. The default C compiler is cc (although gcc is available) and the default Fortran compiler is f95 (although g77 is available). Without defining the F77 environment variable, configure defaults to f95 as a Fortran compiler and eventually fails with the following output: --------------------------------- checking whether mixed C/Fortran
2005 May 20
1
using src/Makevars file
Hi all, Thanks to all who offered advice on using F95 in R. Now I'm trying to compile a test package using gfortran, Linux 2.4.21 and R 2.1.0. I was able to successfully compile and use a test F95 routine by setting my environment variables as follows in bash: export PATH=~/bin/:$PATH export F77=gfortran export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=~/bin/irun/lib export GFORTRAN_STDIN_UNIT=-1 Now I'm
2011 Nov 10
1
assistance building R on RHEL5
I have gotten this error while attempting to build R-2.13.2 and R-2.14.0 using ./configure --with-x=no --enable-R-shlib, and ./configure --with-x=no Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.6 (Tikanga) ========================= Warning in solve.default(rgb) : unable to load shared object '/users/home/mked/R-2.13.2/modules//lapack.so': /users/home/mked/R-2.13.2/lib/libRlapack.so:
2008 Jan 18
1
Fortran level mismatch between package and R
We have a user here who is attempting to compile a package which requires f90 (gfortran will do). Our version of R was built with f77 (g77). When the user attempts to build the package, f77 is always invoked and fails due to the presence of f90 features. Is there a simple method or some documentation on how to force a package build to use a different compiler than the one used in
2002 Jan 15
0
errors intalling splancs and sgeostat
I installed R-1.4.0 and then updated all the packages I have, using update.packages(). I got an error for splancs and sgeostat. Trying to install them 'manually' with R CMD INSTALL, I got the following errors. 1) for splancs: Tue<15:26>library[82]#R CMD INSTALL splancs_2.01-5.tar.gz Installing *source* package `splancs' ... libs f95 -PIC -xO5 -dalign -xlic_lib=sunperf -c
2004 Nov 11
1
R with Sun Studio Fortran 95 compiler
Hi, I am trying to compile R 1.9.1 and 2.0.0 on Solaris 2.8 with Sun Studio Fortran 95 compiler but I have obtained some errors which I enclose. I have compiled R with g77 GNU compiler and it was OK. Does anyone know if R 2.0.0 has been successfully built on Solaris 2.8 with Sun Studio Fortran 95 compiler? or at least, How could I achieve this? The R installation manual does not have any
2005 May 20
1
R 2.1 and gfortran
From the configure output of the latest devel snapshot: > checking for g77... no > checking for f77... no > checking for xlf... no > checking for frt... no > checking for pgf77... no > checking for fl32... no > checking for af77... no > checking for fort77... no > checking for f90... no > checking for xlf90... no > checking for pgf90... no > checking for
2002 Jan 09
1
BLAS and the Sun Performance Library
Hi, all, We just got the Sun Performance Library for our Suns running Solaris 2.6, and I read the relevant section of the "R Installation and Administration Manual" about configuring R to use BLAS. The manual suggests you must use Sun's "cc" and "f95" (maybe "f90"?) compilers in order to use the Performance Library. We have "cc" but not
2006 Jun 07
2
further f77/gfortran
OK: despite Dirk's very kind help, I decided that trying to deal with R configuration and Debian configuration simultaneously was too difficult. I did manage to solve my problem by reconfiguring/making/ installing all of 2.3.1 from source: ./configure F77=/usr/bin/g77 make make install A few questions inspired by this experience: (1) it seems a bit odd that R sets F77=gfortran by
2003 Nov 19
1
Compiling R 1.8.x under Solaris 9
Dear all, I am trying to compile R-1.8.0 and R-1.8.1-beta (as 19-11-2003) under Solaris 9 using the Sun compilers. './configure' fails; the last lines of the display are: checking whether we can compute C Make dependencies... yes, using cc -M checking whether cc supports -c -o FILE.lo... yes checking how to get verbose linking output from f77... -v checking for Fortran 77 libraries...
2005 Aug 13
1
Including Fortran subrutines in a package
Hello! I am creating a packege and I would like to inclued some Fortrun subrutines. I have two questions. 1. Can I use "free form fortan" - compiles well usinf g77 -ffree-form. 2. Is it enough to place the ".for" files in scr folder? Thank you in advance for any help! Ales Ziberna P.S.: I am runing R 2.1.1 on Win XP, SP2. I installed rtools, mingw, perl as suggested in the
2008 Oct 31
3
[LLVMdev] gfortran link failure in current llvm svn
On Oct 30, 2008, at 11:02 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Oct 30, 2008, at 5:23 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >> ps We do have one oddity left in llvm-gfortran from current llvm >> svn. I find everytime I compile something with llvm-gfortran that >> I get a series of warning messages... >> >> f951: warning: command line option "-Wformat" is valid for C/C++/
2010 Jun 08
3
Question on trying to build R 2.11.1 on Tru64(aka OSF1) system
Hello, I am trying to build the R-2.11.1 software for university faculty to use in research projects on a DEC/Compaq/HP AlphaServer model GS160 16CPU/64GB memory running Tru64Unix aka OSF1 version 5.1B-5. Is it known whether it is possible to build the R-2.11.1 software on the platform I am using? In my attempts to build the R-2.11.1 software, I first used the native C and Fortran 77/90/95
2001 Feb 01
1
configure bug in R-1.2.1 and earlier (PR#836)
Unless I force the Fortran compiler through --with-g77, configure fails to find and use the installed g77. I would submit a patch for configure.in, but I can't quite follow the logic in configure.in. $ ./configure creating cache ./config.cache [...] checking for main in -lm... yes checking for g77... /usr/local/gnu/bin/g77 checking for fort77... (cached) /usr/local/gnu/bin/g77 checking for
2012 Jan 19
1
RApache installation problems
Hi all I was trying to isntall RApache last week but ran into strnge problems that no one else seems to be experiencing. At least I couldn't find anything after extensive googling. First off, the machine I'm installing on looks like this: Dell Optiplex 745 32 bit 2GB RAM Fedora 15 httpd -v Server version: Apache/2.2.21 (Unix) Server built: Sep 13 2011 13:46:23 R: R-2.14.0-3.fc15.i686
2004 Apr 30
1
configure problem - mixed fortran/c
I'm trying to build R 1.9.0 to get the opportunity to build rpy for some folks at my office. (I'm a Python guy, not an R guy, so I'm completely unfamiliar with the machinations of building R.) I'm having trouble getting past the configure step. A plain old configure generates this output at the end: checking whether we can compute C Make dependencies... yes, using gcc -MM
1999 Apr 02
4
PLATFORMS Update
NAME Douglas Bates EMAIL bates@stat.wisc.edu VERSION 0.63.3 PLATFORM i386-unknown-linux SYSTEM Debian 2.1 CC/FC/MAKE egcs/g77/make NAME Martyn Plummer EMAIL plummer@iarc.fr VERSION 0.63.3 PLATFORM i386-unknown-linux SYSTEM Redhat 5.1 CC/FC/MAKE gcc/egcs-g77/make NAME Göran Broström EMAIL gb@stat.umu.se VERSION 0.63.3 PLATFORM
2000 Jun 19
2
fortran compile problem with R-1.1.0
Hello List, Knowing I would eventually need to ask for help on the list, I've held off my thanks and congratulations on the 1.+ releases of R. I am amazed at the dedication of the R-core team, and do add my applause and thanks. I've had a compile problem with the latest version which has not occurred before. I'm compiling under: platform sparc-sun-solaris2.6 arch sparc
2006 Apr 25
1
Windows MinGW compiler clarification, consequences
The information at http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-admin.html#The-MinGW-compilers and http://www.murdoch-sutherland.com/Rtools/ is slightly inconsistent about the compiler used to build Windows binary packages available through cran. The 'candidate' package of the recommended MinGW-5.0.0.exe installs g++/g77 3.4.4 (as does the updated installer MinGW-5.0.2.exe). "An
2005 Apr 11
1
Unable to compile icecast 2.2.0 under Suse 9.2
Dear list members, I am not able to compile the icecast source under Suse 9.2. as i have to admit my experience in compiling is reduced to typing ./configure. Is there someone who can help me with this error message? linux:~/shoutcast/server/icecast # ./configure checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for