similar to: Minor typos with UseMethod docs (PR#8269)

Full_Name: Mike Kay Version: 2.0.1 OS: Linux Submission from: (NULL) (137.75.70.37) Hi, Here are some typos/grammatical errors that I found while reading the doc. referenced in the subject line. Hope this helps. -mike Page 4, first paragraph of 2.1.4: 'objects which they contain' -> 'objects which contain' Page 5, second paragraph of 2.1.10 'environment can be

Dear developers: I have observed a change in the behaviour of S3 method despatch (as I guess related to namespaces) between 2.6.2 and yesterday's 2.7.0 RC and would be grateful if you could comment on that: the 'Axis' function in the 'graphics' namespace calls UseMethod("Axis",x), internally to despatch on the S3 Axis method depending on the type of the argument.

Following my previous post on S3 method despatch, I put debug messages in the code of Axis, Axis.default and plot.default in graphics/R/axis.R and graphics/R/plot.R to print the class of x, at and y on plot. After recompiling R, what I see is that x *lost* its class attribute (at least for classes not known to 'graphics') in Axis, called directly from plot.default and this could be the

I was a little optimistic that the modified version passed _all_ the tests. When I installed the complete change, all the fullcheck tests passed except two, demos and isas-tests. There is a tiny difference in the output of the demos test, where the previous demos.Rout had what looks like an unwanted piece of output, printing an attribute "legend" after doing symnum(summary(detg.mod,

I raised the questions below a couple of months ago by sending it to the developers mailing list, but I don't know if it got through since no one replied to it. Looking at the [R] distribution, the UseMethod() is used in the following way: alias <- function(object, ...) UseMethod("alias") or barplot <- function(height, ...) UseMethod("barplot") What I

Dear R developers, I will ask a very straightforward question concerning UseMethod's future, because people depending on my code wonder what will happen to it next. In R v2.0.1 NEWS it says o The undocumented use of UseMethod() with no argument is now formally deprecated. and in the R v2.0.1 help(UseMethod) it says 'UseMethod' accepts a call with no arguments and tries to

I'm having difficulty with Rprof. I have a documentation example test.qss that runs fine without profiling, but under Rprof, > Rprof() > source("test.qss") Error in standardGeneric("model.matrix") : UseMethod used in an inappropriate fashion Luke wrote about a similar circumstance last summer: # From: Luke Tierney (luke@stat.umn.edu) # Date: Fri Jul

match the argument 'x' if there is another argument with prefix 'x' Full_Name: Henrik Bengtsson Version: 1.3.1 OS: Sun Solaris 8 Submission from: (NULL) (130.235.3.49) I ran into a strange problem with UseMethod(). Run the following code: foo.Bar <- function(this, x=0, xidx=0) { cat("In foo.Bar(): ", this, ", x=", x, ", xidx=", xidx,

1. UseMethod (via usemethod in objects.c) now uses the definition of class() to dispatch, with the methods package attached (dataClass(x)) and without (attr(x, "class")). Packages using a construction of the form if(is.null(class(x))) class(x) <- data.class(x) UseMethod("foo") should now get similar dispatch with the methods package attached. 2. all.equal and some of its

UseMethod has since the beginning had the 'feature' that local variables in the generic are added to the environment in which the method body is evaluated. This is documented in ?UseMethod and R-lang.texi, but use of this 'feature' has been explicitly discouraged in R-lang.texi for many years. This is an unfortunate design decision for a number of reasons (see below), so the plan

If I do > example(lm) ... > mycoef <- function(object, ...) UseMethod("coef", object) > mycoef(lm.D9) Error in mycoef(lm.D9) : no applicable method for "coef" which is pretty surprising, as coef has a default method. After a bit of digging, this comes from do_usemethod having defenv = environment where the generic was defined */ defenv =

Hi, The 2 man pages give inconsistent description of class(): Found in ?class: If the object does not have a class attribute, it has an implicit class, ?"matrix"?, ?"array"? or the result of ?mode(x)? (except that integer vectors have implicit class ?"integer"?). Found in ?UseMethod: Matrices and arrays have class ?"matrix"?

hi,usRs,i am studing the R programming,but i can not get the point abut the difference between UseMethod and NextMehod.i have read the manual and try to find the solutin from internet,but i still not master it well.so anyone can give me a guide?it will be better to show some examples . thank you !

Hello, is the following somehow possible with Mod() being a primitive: "Mod" <- function(x) UseMethod("Mod") "Mod.default" <- function(x) { .Primitive("Mod") ### I know it?s wrong. How can I access the original Mod ? } Thanks for help M. Eger -- +------------------------------------------------------- | Marcus Eger | Philipps Universitaet

I'm running R 3.4.1 on Linux. I'm getting the following error message. Error in UseMethod("xmlAttrs", node) : no applicable method for 'xmlAttrs' applied to an object of class "NULL" Calls: rdKMeans -> rdLoadModel -> xmlAttrs This appears to be a known issue in R Linux that was supposed to be patched. Is this really fixed? Was it fixed in 3.4.2?

(opening new bug report thread, on suggestion of BDR ..) I said on vaguely related topic: MM> There's another long-standing MM> UseMethod / NextMethod / Dispatch problem that I've never traced/solved.. MM> MM> Look at the $RHOME/tests/mode-methods.R file ! Peter Dalgaard already remarked : PD> ..i.e. this: PD> abc <- function(x, ...) { PD> if

# Your mailer is set to "none" (default on Windows), # hence we cannot send the bug report directly from R. # Please copy the bug report (after finishing it) to # your favorite email program and send it to # # r-bugs@r-project.org # ###################################################### 1. as.numeric behaves differently in R than in S and I think this shows a bug in how S3

Hi all, I'm seeking feedback (good, bad or indifferent) in regards to developing (further) a new class system for R, that uses encapsulated class definitions (i.e. the method definitions are literally inside the body of the class definition). A working (however very rough and poorly tested) system is available in my R package "oosp" with documentation in the vignette

If I have a class Foo, then i can write an S3 method for sum for it: >setClass("Foo",representation(a="integer"));aFoo=new("Foo",a=c(1:3,NA)) >sum.Foo <- function(x,na.rm){print(x);print(na.rm);sum(x at a,na.rm=na.rm)} >sum(aFoo) But how do I write an S4 method for this? All my attempts to do so have foundered. For example

R-devel doc/NEWS.Rd (SVN 57472) contains: \item There are two new options for typesetting PDF manuals from Rd files. These are \samp{beramono} and \samp{inconsolata}, and used the named font for mononspaced output. They are intended to be used in combination with \samp{times}, and \samp{times,inconsolata,hyper} is now the default for the reference manual and