similar to: Installing R-2.2.0 package

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "Installing R-2.2.0 package"

2003 Apr 08
3
SAMBA 2.07 Question
Hello, We are currently running SAMBA 2.07 on our AIX 4.3.3 UNIX systems. We just received the following: OpenPKG Security Advisory OpenPKG-SA-2003.028: samba - remote root exploit Does this affect SAMBA 2.07? This is all that I see affected: OpenPKG Security Advisory The OpenPKG Project http://www.openpkg.org/security.html http://www.openpkg.org
2009 Dec 08
1
openpkg
Anyone here using openpkg? Any thoughts about it? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20091208/db87fa65/attachment.html>
2003 Sep 17
1
third one?
http://www.openpkg.org/security/OpenPKG-SA-2003.040-openssh.html seems like 3.7.1 is still affected?
2006 Jan 07
1
CIFS + NFS'ing a single filesystem w/ locking
Hi, I have a Solaris 10 server exporting UFS directories using built-in NFS. I've built Samba 3.0.20b from OpenPKG (www.openpkg.org). I have a Solaris 10 (x86) client mounting the NFS share and opening OpenDocument files using StarOffice 8 (SO8, aka OO2.0). I also have a Windows 2003 Terminal Server mounting the Samba share and opening documents with SO8. This is a temporary development
2005 Mar 04
2
pop before smtp
I'm using the latest version of dovecot on my FreeBSD 4.x box with OpenPKG to keep other services up to date. Now...I'm able to get pbsmtp to allow relaying through postfix on this server using UW IMAP, but I would like to get dovecot working with relaying...but pbsmtp is not adding the ip when I uncomment the dovecot section after I authenticate. The log is below: [root at
2005 Jan 13
0
[Bug 2240] New: Add last-match/short-circuit processing of include/exclude
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2240 Summary: Add last-match/short-circuit processing of include/exclude Product: rsync Version: 2.6.3 Platform: All URL: http://cvs.openpkg.org/getfile/openpkg- src/rsync/rsync.patch.lastmatch OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW
2017 Feb 15
5
Unsigned int displaying as negative
Where does the unsignedSub come from? On 2017-02-15 20:38, Ryan Taylor wrote: > Sorry, it should be: > > defm SUB16u_ : ABD_NonCommutative<"sub16u", unsignedSub, LOADRegs, > GPRRegs, DSTRegs, i16, i16, i16, uimm16, immZExt16x>; > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I see. If I put simm16 and
2013 Oct 02
2
[LLVMdev] [CLang] Comparing vector types - invalid error and proposed fix
I was investigating an error diagnostic in the following test example: typedef signed char char16 __attribute__((ext_vector_type(16))); void test( char16 srcA, char16 srcB, char16 *dst) { *dst = ( srcA == srcB ); } which produces the message: mismatch.c:5:10: error: assigning to 'char16' from incompatible type 'char __attribute__((ext_vector_type(16)))' *dst = (
2017 Apr 12
2
Is there a way to correlate operation to machine instruction?
For example, given a multiclass for ADD 32 bit that might produce something like: ADD32_REG_REG_REG (operands are all registers for a 32 bit add) ADD32_REG_IMM_REG (srcA is a register, srcB is an immediate and dst is a register) ADD32_REG_IMM_MEM (srcA is a register, srcB is an immediate and dst is a memory address) What I'd like to do is replace an operand, for example, change srcA from a
2011 Feb 15
0
Problem with yumhelper.py and python version
I have this ouput when I do a "yum check-update" which is the command which is run in the yumhelper.py : Loaded plugins: rhnplugin, security This system is not registered with RHN. RHN support will be disabled. Skipping security plugin, no data compat-dapl.i386 2.0.13-4.el5 rhel- Server compat-dapl.x86_64 2.0.13-4.el5
2017 Feb 15
4
Unsigned int displaying as negative
I see. If I put simm16 and immSExt16x in place of uimm16 and immZExt16x respectively, the imm matches but it prints out -32768 (which is invalid for sub16u). We are using uimm16 not match unsigned but for PrintMethod, effectively uimm16 and simm16 are both Operand<i16>. I'm still unclear why simm16 matches and uimm16 does not. Here is the pattern if that helps at all. So just as a
2008 Sep 09
0
Puppet + openpkg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, has anyone looked at using puppet to manage openpkg instances? I''m considering to use openpkg to get the latest and gratest - but it has to fit with puppet :) kind regards, Tarjei -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
2013 Oct 02
0
[LLVMdev] [CLang] Comparing vector types - invalid error and proposed fix
Hi Martin, On Oct 2, 2013, at 6:25 AM, Martin O'Riordan <Martin.ORiordan at movidius.com> wrote: > I was investigating an error diagnostic in the following test example: > > typedef signed char char16 __attribute__((ext_vector_type(16))); > > void test( char16 srcA, char16 srcB, char16 *dst) { > *dst = ( srcA == srcB ); > } > > which produces the
2015 Sep 29
3
Duplicating node in SelectionDAG?
It appears that it's impossible to duplicate a node in the dag. For example, there is some code: b = a * a; // a is a global int A LD node is generated for A and it goes into both Operand 0 and 1 of the MUL node. The issue is I'm trying to match a pattern of: set dstReg:$dstD (OpNode (srcAType (load addr32:$srcA)), (srcBType (load addr32:$srcB))) so basically a mem, mem, reg
2017 Feb 15
2
Unsigned int displaying as negative
Thanks for your reply. We are propagating sign info to tablegen currently using BinaryWithFlagsSDNode.Flags.hasNoSignedWrap atm. I imagine (I have not looked) they are printed according to instruction in AsmPrinter.cpp (pure speculation). I'm still confused as to why 0x7FFF is ok to match 16 bit int but not 0x8000? Thanks. On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Manuel Jacob <me at
2012 Jun 25
2
[LLVMdev] Is llc broken for Cortex-A9 + neon ?
Hi all, considering following .ll file ; ModuleID = 'vect3x.ll' target triple = "armv7-none-linux-gnueabi" define arm_aapcscc void @test_hi_char8(i8* %.T0351, <8 x i8>* nocapture %srcA, <4 x i8>* nocapture %dst) noinline { L.entry: %0 = tail call arm_aapcscc i32 (...)* @get_global_id(i8* %.T0351, i32 0) %1 = bitcast <8 x i8>* %srcA to <4 x i8>*
2003 Dec 15
1
minor documentation typo ?
Hi, I believe the following is a very minor typo in the documentation for merge() : all logical; all=L is shorthand for all.x=L and all.y=L ^ ^ ^ Looks like 'L' should be 'FALSE'. Someone please alert me if I am wrong. If I am not wrong, is it appropriate to submit a bug for such minor detail? Thanks, Jim James A. Rogers
2005 Sep 12
1
Help with a more flexible funtion for multiple comparisio n of means
Jose - Before implementing SNK and Duncan's, you may want to be aware of some criticisms of these methods: >From Hsu (1996), "Newman-Keuls multiple range test is not a confident inequalities method and cannot be recommended." "Duncan's multiple range test is not a confident inequalities method and cannot be recommended either. In the words of Tukey (1991),
2006 Jan 08
3
Samba with ADS on Sun Solaris System
Hi, We are facing problems while configuring SAMBA ADS on Sun Solaris system. After installation and configuration we found that there is no ADS support on the version samba-3.0.21a-1-noads-sunos5.9-sparc.pkg.gz. Do you have any ADS support package for Sun Solaris 9. Kind Regards Venu Gopal Sr. Systems Engineer SSA Global Technologies India (Pvt) Ltd Hyderabad,India Tel : +91 40 23100525
2004 May 06
1
sporadic errors with nlrq() / optim()
Dear List, Apologies if this is a known problem ... I wasn't able to find it on the bug list, but it is a problem that does not seem to occur with a MAC build of R 2.0, so perhaps this problem has already been addressed for the future. I am getting *sporadic* errors when refitting the same model to the same data set, using nlrq() in the nlrq package. The algorithm is not stochastic, so I