similar to: wchar and wstring.

Attached 2012/2/8 Marcello Maggioni <hayarms at gmail.com>: > Mmm, sorry, the patch I posted crashes if ExitBr is null (which it may > be ...) , this one should be ok (and passess all the ScalarEvolution > tests in LLVM): > > diff --git a/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp b/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp > index daf7742..b10fab2 100644 > ---

Mmm, sorry, the patch I posted crashes if ExitBr is null (which it may be ...) , this one should be ok (and passess all the ScalarEvolution tests in LLVM): diff --git a/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp b/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp index daf7742..b10fab2 100644 --- a/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp +++ b/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp @@ -4293,9 +4293,15 @@

Hello, I'm finding problems with BackEdgeTaken count calculation in even simple fortran loops with gfortran-4.6 + DragonEgg 3.0. Even for simple double loops like this one: program test2 integer i,j,k dimension k(100,100) do j=1,100 do i=1,100 k(i,j) = i enddo enddo write(*,*) k(1,30) end make the ScalarEvolution

Well, it wasn't intended as a "real" patch to be included , but more as a "proof of concept" for a solution. Do you think it is a valid solution and I'm correct in my assumption? If so then I'll clean up the patch and attach a testcase for inclusion. Thanks! Marcello 2012/2/9 Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com>: > Your patch should include a testcase,

Your patch should include a testcase, see test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution for examples. "BranchInst* " should be "BranchInst *". You should have spaces after the // in your comments. One of the comment lines isn't indented properly. Nick On 8 February 2012 12:05, Marcello Maggioni <hayarms at gmail.com> wrote: > Attached > > 2012/2/8 Marcello Maggioni

This is the .ll for that graph (attached). I think I understand what you are saying. This particular testcase returns CNC not because the exit block doesn't have a unique predecessor, but because the unique predecessor (the inner loop block) has a successor that is inside the loop (in this case itself, because it's the inner loop block). That doesn't change, anyway, the assuption that

On 8 February 2012 15:50, Marcello Maggioni <hayarms at gmail.com> wrote: > Well, it wasn't intended as a "real" patch to be included , but more > as a "proof of concept" for a solution. Do you think it is a valid > solution and I'm correct in my assumption? If so then I'll clean up > the patch and attach a testcase for inclusion. > I'm

This is instead a very simple (handmade) test case that triggers the problem (attached) Also a more conforming patch has been attached 2012/2/9 Marcello Maggioni <hayarms at gmail.com>: > This is the .ll for that graph (attached). I think I understand what > you are saying. > This particular testcase returns CNC not because the exit block > doesn't have a unique predecessor,

FInally I had the time to complete everything up. Now I included the test case in the patch and the testcase runs with the LLVM tests system. 2012/2/9 Marcello Maggioni <hayarms at gmail.com>: > This is instead a very simple (handmade) test case that triggers the > problem (attached) > Also a more conforming patch has been attached > > 2012/2/9 Marcello Maggioni <hayarms

Why when I call resp.getHeader(''Location''); after my ajax call does the browser get redirected to the location header. I just want to get the value of it. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to

i updated to the latest up2date rpm.... then when updating to the latest kernel this is what happened after i ran up2date -fu for the kernel/kernel-source updates Testing package set / solving RPM inter-dependencies... Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/sbin/up2date", line 1174, in ? sys.exit(main() or 0) File "/usr/sbin/up2date", line 772, in main

Hi Piotr, On March 31, 2017 at 1:07:12 PM, Piotr Padlewski (piotr.padlewski at gmail.com) wrote: > [snip] > Do I understand it correctly, that it is legal to do the hoist because all > of the instructions above %vtable does not throw? Yes, I think you're right.  HeaderMayThrow is a conservative approximation, and the conservativeness is biting us here. > Are there any plans to

Hello, I want to insert a control-block before every outermost loop. My current solution is: 1) find each outermost loop in some function; 2) find the loop header with Loop->getHeader() APIs, and then insert the controller block before the header block of current loop. But I encounters problems when there multi subsequent loops in the following example, where there is no code between loops:

For example, the following changes are necessary when i convert a Japanese hiragana into katakana in chattr. R code: > chartr("\u3041-\u3093","\u30a1-\u30f3","\u3084\u3063\u305f\u30fc") --- R-alpha.orig/src/main/character.c 2007-09-05 07:13:27.000000000 +0900 +++ R-alpha/src/main/character.c 2007-09-13 16:10:21.000000000 +0900 @@ -2041,6 +2041,16 @@

Full_Name: Albrecht Gebhardt Version: 0.90.0 OS: osf4.0 Submission from: (NULL) (143.205.61.73) I had to apply the following patch to be able to compile on an alpha with DU 4.0E: ############################################### --- ./src/main/gram.y.mkString-patch Tue Nov 23 12:16:29 1999 +++ ./src/main/gram.y Tue Nov 23 12:16:59 1999 @@ -56,7 +56,8 @@ SEXP mkFloat(char *); SEXP

Dear Debian/Ubuntu experts, For the second time users of my BioC package reported problems when trying to compile it on Debian/Ubuntu. The error is always the same: "'wcstombs' was not declared in this scope", see: https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/pipermail/bioconductor/2010-February/031739.html https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/bioconductor/2009-August/029192.html Since I have no

Hello, I am wondering whether I can get the variable name of loop trip count in LLVM? For example, int NUM; NUM=atoi(argv[i]); for (int i=0; i<NUM; i++) { ... } How can I get the corresponding variable name for "NUM"? Then, I can instrument something in the source code to record the loop trip count for a given input data set. BasicBlock* b = L->getHeader(); returns the

Hi all, I'm on Ubuntu 18.04, running R-4.0.0 which I compiled from source, and using valgrind I am always seeing the following message. Does anybody else see that? Is that a known false positive? Any ideas how to fix/suppress? Seems related to TRE, do I need to upgrade that? (base) tdhock at maude-MacBookPro:~/R/binsegRcpp$ R --vanilla -d valgrind -e 'extSoftVersion()' ==9565==

I'm trying to get a reference to this object in C SWX.RET[1:6,c("SBI,"SPI","SII")] While i am able to access and use a plain SWX.RET object, I'm getting confused on how to create an object with the array subscripts like above. Here is what I tried to do. It doesn't work because "[" is obviously not an operation or function on SWX.RET. So how do I

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Jeroen Ooms <jeroen.ooms at stat.ucla.edu> wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Gabriel Becker <gmbecker at ucdavis.edu> > wrote: > > Shouldn't Rf_mkString(NULL) return (the c-level equivalent of) > character() > > rather than the NA_character_? > > No. It should still be safe to assume that mkString() always returns