similar to: single assignment affecting multiple sub-structures (PR#7924)

Hi! I want to know the way that calls are answer in this case... I have queue1 and queue2, one agent that receive call from both queues. queue1 <- call1 queue1 <- call2 queue2 <- call3 queue2 <- call4 In my test the agent answer calls in this order: call1,call3,call2 and call4. I think this must be in this order call1,call2, call3, call4 like a big FIFO. Its ok this behavior? Could

On Aug 5, 2011, at 10:57 AM, Peter Lawrence wrote: > However it seems that if a landingpad-block has multiple predecessors (often the case, > multiple InvokeInst in the main body of a try-statement all go to the same landingpad- > block), then you cannot move the LandingpadInst in order to break a critical edge unless > you do it for _all_ landingpad-block predecessor edges

Hi I am using LLVM to help me do some code analysis. I wrote a LLVM Function Pass to help me to generate some information. I use the code below to get the source line information for every instruction. for (BasicBlock &BB : F){ for(Instruction &I: BB){ DILocation* Loc = I.getDebugLoc().get(); unsigned Line = Loc->getLine() } } I think the function's first

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 5:25 AM Muhui Jiang via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi > > I am using LLVM to help me do some code analysis. I wrote a LLVM Function > Pass to help me to generate some information. I use the code below to get > the source line information for every instruction. > > for (BasicBlock &BB : F){ > for(Instruction &I:

Hi David Thank you very much for your suggestions. ScopeLine works well. It could represent the start of a function. Do you know whether I can get the start column of this function? Many Thanks Regards Muhui 2018-05-30 3:25 GMT+08:00 David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>: > > > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 5:25 AM Muhui Jiang via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>

Hi, Again, sorry for the length of this post. Once I get my new office I will get a website set up on my work machine and will simply post a link to the log since I doubt many people are truly interested in these logs. To further analyze what is happening, I added my own routine in main.c called DEBUG_SET_NAMED and then redefined the SET_NAMED macro to use it and then rebuilt R. I

Thanks. isFreeCall() works well but for %call2 = call i32 bitcast (i32 (...)* @free to i32 (i8*)*)(i8* %call1) nounwind, !dbg !16 So I tried to figure out when the above instruction occurred. When <stdlib.h> is included, free(buf2R1); turn into call void @free(i8* %call1) nounwind, !dbg !16 when I forget to include <stdlib.h>, free(buf2R1); turn into %call2 = call i32 bitcast (i32

if you don't include stdlib.h, where free() is declared, you'll simply get a default C function signature: int free(...); On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Jane <270611649 at qq.com> wrote: > Thanks. isFreeCall() works well but for > %call2 = call i32 bitcast (i32 (...)* @free to i32 (i8*)*)(i8* %call1) > nounwind, !dbg !16 > So I tried to figure out when the above

Hi, I want to edit LLVM generated IR file, like as given below, Original LLVM IR file, @.str2 = private unnamed_addr constant [17 x i8] c"\0AI am in one_11\0A\00", align 1 ; Function Attrs: nounwind define i32 @one_1(i32 %ivar1, i32 %ivar2) #0 { entry: %ivar1.addr = alloca i32, align 4 %ivar2.addr = alloca i32, align 4 %isum = alloca i32, align 4 store i32 %ivar1, i32*

Guys, on second thought... doesn't making the exception registers live from the InvokeInst to the LandingpadInst create problems for critical-edge-splitting ? if a landingpad-edge is critical and needs to be split, won't we be creating and inserting a new BB between the "invoke-block" and the "landingpad-block", and if we do then isn't there the

Hi, I want to call/add some functions(that defined in another file) on top of some functions, and reflect the same changes in object file. No, I am not looking for contractor. Thanks, Deepika On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 7:04 PM, mats petersson <mats at planetcatfish.com> wrote: > What is the condition for adding this code? > > What have you tried so far? [Or are you looking for a

Hi, Yes I am looking for IR pass that will do insert call of functions that defined in another file. Links/suggestions that guide me to start for adding IR pass will help me so much. Regards, Deepika On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 1:03 PM, mats petersson <mats at planetcatfish.com> wrote: > So how do you know what you want to modify (conceptually)? > > Have you got a IR pass that you

I''m having a problem with multiple Ajax.Updater instances. I have five small chunks of data being loaded into my homepage, and they seem to be firing off one at a time. So the pieces load up in the order they were called. Maybe I''m being a noob, but shouldn''t all those requests just fire away and then place the content as it gets received? I was doing multiple versions,

Hi, My requirement is something like as given below, a.c => a.obj contains a1() and a2() function b.c => b.obj contains b1() and b2() function main.c => main.obj call to a1, a2, b1, b2 Now, I want to move a1(), a2() from a.obj to b2.obj and on top of function b1() When I call b1() from main, it should call first a1, a2 and then function definition of b1 Can you please give me some

I am working with some survival data with missing values. I am using the mice package to do multiple imputation. I have found code in this thread which handles pooling of the MI results: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2007-May/132180.html Now I would like to plot a survival curve using the pooled results. Here is a reproducible example: require(survival) require(mice) set.seed(2) dt

Hi, I'm trying to write a pass to detect all free()/delete() call instructions in LLVM IR.The method is as follows. First I find Call Instructions: CallInst *CI=dyn_cast<CallInst>(&*i); then see if the Function name matches: name=CI->getCalledFunction()->getName(); if(name=="_ZdlPv"||name=="_ZdaPv"||name=="free")

After I spend some time working with the function attribute* deduction pass** [1,3], I would like to propose a "proper" organization***. Why? Because we do not derive nearly as many attributes as we could****, while we do maintain various (separate and diffently organized) "data-flow-like analyses" to do so. What else? I propose a single optimistic data-flow

Hi All, Well I finally have found the time to get svn working and I have successfully built my own tuned atlas (multi-threaded version) libs and have both the r-devel and r-patched trees building daily on my box. The problem is I still do not have a good idea of the layout and design of R, and typically I "learn by doing" by trying to fix a bug that hits me. Unfortunately ;-)

Hi, my friends I finally insert the callInst into the hello.bc file.Then I compile the hello.bc to hello.o file and the check.c to check.o file. And I think by link those to .o file togetherI can get the executable ELF file(clang hello.o check.o -o finalfile). But when I link the two objective file, it said "hello.o: In function `main': hello.bc:(.text+0x69): undefined reference to

Your files do not appear to implement the check() function. On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 4:57 PM, 15102925731 <zhenkaixd at 126.com> wrote: > Hi, my friends > > I finally insert the callInst into the hello.bc file.Then I compile the > hello.bc to hello.o file and the check.c to check.o file. And I think by > link those to .o file togetherI can get the executable ELF file(clang