Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "(PR#7826) segfault during build of 2.1.0 on RH9; print.POSIXct"
2005 Apr 30
1
segfault during build of 2.1.0 on RH9; print.POSIXct implicated (PR#7827)
In attempting to build R using
rpmbuild --rebuild R-2.1.0-0.fdr.2.fc3.src.rpm
on a fairly up-to-date RedHat 9 system (that is, with patches installed
through May 1 2004), it failed at the make check-all step.
The problem was reproducible by going into the tests directory and
make test-Segfault
The last lines of the saved file no-segfault.Rout.fail are
> > ## c.POSIXct :
> >
2005 Apr 30
0
segfault during build of 2.1.0 on RH9; print.POSIXct implicated (PR#7826)
In attempting to build R using
rpmbuild --rebuild R-2.1.0-0.fdr.2.fc3.src.rpm
on a fairly up-to-date RedHat 9 system (that is, with patches installed
through May 1 2004), it failed at the make check-all step.
The problem was reproducible by going into the tests directory and
make test-Segfault
The last lines of the saved file no-segfault.Rout.fail are
> > ## c.POSIXct :
> >
2005 May 01
0
Re: (PR#7826) ... segfault during build of 2.1.0 on RH9; print.POSIXct ...
Dear Peter,
Thank you very much for your kind and helpful reply.
As I mentioned in a followup email to r-bugs, indeed, one aspect of this
issue is a (user specified) shorter stack than that expected by R -- I
had only allowed 1 MB of stack space a long long time ago, and forgotten
about it.
Due to a glitch with r-bugs@r-project.org, I ended up submitting this
bug twice, and your original
2005 Apr 30
0
(PR#7826) Re: ... print.POSIXct .. infinite recursion
Thank you, Jskud.
I can reproduce your problem, though not the
seg.fault, see below
>>>>> "Jskud" == Jskud <Jskud@Jskud.com>
>>>>> on Sat, 30 Apr 2005 09:04:03 +0200 (CEST) writes:
Jskud> In attempting to build R using rpmbuild --rebuild
Jskud> R-2.1.0-0.fdr.2.fc3.src.rpm
Jskud> on a fairly up-to-date RedHat 9 system (that
2003 Feb 06
1
rdbi segmentation fault (fwd)
one more bit of information about this problem. If I start R as the
user "postgres" i dont have the segmentation fault.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 19:19:39 -0500 (EST)
From: Rafael A. Irizarry <ririzarr at jhsph.edu>
Reply-To: rafa at jhu.edu
To: "R-Help (E-mail)" <r-help at r-project.org>
Subject: rdbi segmentation fault
hi! i
2008 Sep 27
1
seg.fault from nlme::gnls() {was "[R-sig-ME] GNLS Crash"}
>>>>> "VW" == Viechtbauer Wolfgang (STAT) <Wolfgang.Viechtbauer at STAT.unimaas.nl>
>>>>> on Fri, 26 Sep 2008 18:00:19 +0200 writes:
VW> Hi all, I'm trying to fit a marginal (longitudinal)
VW> model with an exponential serial correlation function to
VW> the Orange tree data set. However, R crashes frequently
VW>
2004 Sep 13
6
Spare some CPU cycles for testing lme?
If anyone has a few extra CPU cycles to spare,
I'd appreciate it if you could verify a problem that I
have encountered. Run the code
below and tell me if it crashes your R before
completion.
library(lme4)
data(bdf)
dump<-sapply( 1:50000, function(i) {
fm <- lme(langPOST ~ IQ.ver.cen + avg.IQ.ver.cen, data = bdf,
random = ~ IQ.ver.cen | schoolNR);
cat("
2003 Feb 06
0
rdbi segmentation fault
hi! i am experiencing the same behaviour explained here:
http://finzi.psych.upenn.edu/R/Rhelp02/archive/2482.html
(i copied the message below)
has anybody found a solution?
here is the code that gives me a segmentation fault
library(Rdbi)
library(Rdbi.PgSQL)
conn <- dbConnect(PgSQL(), dbname = "PGA")
tmp <- "create table test ( expid int, name varchar(128));"
2012 Aug 09
4
debug vs regular mode
Dear all,
I had a R segmentation fault, and then invoked debug mode and ran step
by step.
When I reached "terms(Y~X1*X2*...*X16)", I would then have
"segmentation" fault. However, if I just ran this under regular "R
interactive" mode, it would be fine though taking long time.
My questions are:
1. Is there a known limit of terms for a formula?
2. Why does the
2012 Aug 09
4
debug vs regular mode
Dear all,
I had a R segmentation fault, and then invoked debug mode and ran step
by step.
When I reached "terms(Y~X1*X2*...*X16)", I would then have
"segmentation" fault. However, if I just ran this under regular "R
interactive" mode, it would be fine though taking long time.
My questions are:
1. Is there a known limit of terms for a formula?
2. Why does the
2003 Feb 28
2
R Graphics Crash Problem
I recently built R 1.6.2 on solaris 2.8 with gcc 3.2.
Things seem to run OK, but using graphics causes R to
core dump. (For instance, by using the plot() or
hist() functions.) Sometimes I can see the graphics
drawn before it actually core dumps. The core file
shows a crash in Rf_gpptr.
I'm quite new to R, so I don't know what info would be
helpful for diagnosis. I'm including
2007 Dec 07
0
Bug#454678: r-base-core: Crash when calling edit.matrix with edit.row.names = TRUE when there are no rownames (PR#10500)
Ben,
Thanks for the bug report. I am off two minds about it as discussed below.
But as it does indeed create a crash / segfault, I am passing this on to the
R bug tracker. A suggested two-line patch is below; I tested the patch
against a 'vanilla' 2.6.1 source tree.
On 6 December 2007 at 19:32, Ben Goodrich wrote:
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
| Hash: SHA1
|
| Package:
2007 Dec 07
0
(PR#10500) Bug#454678: r-base-core: Crash when calling
I would say this was user error (insisting on editing non-existent
rownames), although the argument is documented. You could argue that
there are implicit rownames, but they would be 1, 2 ... not row1, row2
.... And rownames(mat) is NULL.
For an interactive function the best solution seems to be to throw an
error when the user asks for the impossible.
I'll fix it for 2.7.0: it
2003 Oct 09
2
R-1.8.0 on Sparc Solaris 8, gcc3.2.1, bus error and core dump (PR#4485)
Example run and stack trace:
wazor /s/src/stat/R-1.8.0/tests/Examples $ ../../bin/R --no-save < base-Ex.R
R : Copyright 2003, The R Development Core Team
Version 1.8.0 (2003-10-08)
R is free software and comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.
You are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions.
Type 'license()' or 'licence()' for distribution details.
R is a
2016 Dec 06
6
segfault with POSIXlt zone=NULL zone=""
Hi all,
I ran into a segfault while playing with dates.
$ R --no-init-file
...
> library(lubridate); d=as.POSIXlt(floor_date(Sys.time(),"year")); d$zone=NULL; d$zone=""; d
Attaching package: ?lubridate?
The following object is masked from ?package:base?:
date
Warning message:
package ?lubridate? was built under R version 3.4.0
2016 Dec 15
2
print.POSIXct doesn't seem to use tz argument, as per its example
On the documentation page for DateTimeClasses, in the Examples section,
there are the following two lines:
format(.leap.seconds) # the leap seconds in your time zone
print(.leap.seconds, tz = "PST8PDT") # and in Seattle's
The second line (using print) seems to ignore the tz argument, and prints
the dates in my time zone, while:
format(.leap.seconds, tz =
2012 Feb 02
1
Problem with GMT+/- time zones
I'm struggling with time zone version when expressed as hours offset from GMT. Can anyone confirm that the behaviour below is incorrect? It seems that the GMT offsets are backwards:
> format(as.POSIXct("2011-05-23 17:23:00", tz="Europe/London"),tz="America/New_York",usetz=T)
[1] "2011-05-23 12:23:00 EDT"
- this works.
>
2016 Dec 16
0
print.POSIXct doesn't seem to use tz argument, as per its example
>>>>> Jennifer Lyon <jennifer.s.lyon at gmail.com>
>>>>> on Thu, 15 Dec 2016 09:33:30 -0700 writes:
> On the documentation page for DateTimeClasses, in the Examples section,
> there are the following two lines:
>
> format(.leap.seconds) # the leap seconds in your time zone
> print(.leap.seconds, tz = "PST8PDT") # and in
2008 Feb 04
1
strftime fails on POSIXct objects (PR#10695)
R 2.6.1 on a Thinkpad T60 running up-to-date Gentoo:
Despite the documentation, which says:
'strftime' is an alias for 'format.POSIXlt', and 'format.POSIXct'
first converts to class '"POSIXlt"' by calling 'as.POSIXlt'. Note
that only that conversion depends on the time zone.
strftime fails on POSIXct objects:
> foo <-
2005 Jan 19
1
Re: [R-SIG-Mac] Formatting of time zone for POSIXct
Don,
thanks for your report.
On Jan 19, 2005, at 12:41 PM, Don MacQueen wrote:
> I'm encountering a problem formatting POSIXct objects in R 2.0.1 on OS
> X.
>
> For reference, on a Solaris system, R 2.0.1 (2004-11-15), formatting
> is correct:
>
>> Sys.time()
> [1] "2005-01-19 09:12:33 PST"
>> format(Sys.time(),'%H:%M %Z')
> [1]