similar to: ieee1394 firewire disk unable to see or mount [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

I have set up an ocfs system using two linux nodes connected using firewire. Details: # uname -a Linux testrac2 2.4.21-9.0.1.ELorafw1 #1 Tue Mar 2 14:42:46 PST 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux # cat /etc/issue Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES release 3 (Taroon Update 1) # rpm -qa |grep ocfs ocfs-tools-1.1.2-1 ocfs-2.4.21-EL-1.0.12-1 ocfs-support-1.1.2-1 <> Oracle version: 9.2.0.5 Cluster

Hi, I am trying to get FreeBSD 4.7 to connect to a Maxtor 5000XT drive, but I get the following when connecting it -> Apr 26 09:19:43 chowder /kernel: fwohci0: node_id = 0xc000ffc1, CYCLEMASTER mode Apr 26 09:19:43 chowder /kernel: firewire0: 2 nodes, maxhop <= 1, cable IRM = 1 (me) Apr 26 09:19:50 chowder /kernel: fwohci0: BUS reset Apr 26 09:19:50 chowder /kernel: fwohci0: node_id =

I just recently downloaded and installed the CentOS 3.3 release, and I'm having a bit of a problem... It appears that no support for firewire drives has been included. I am unable to find the ohci1394 or sbp2 modules anywhere. Are there other packages which must be installed from the distribution to get firewire devices to be recognized? Thanks. --Steve

Hi list I'm havining problems with a E1 Digium Card (TE120) here are the description of the problem: Case 1: Zaptel 1.4.8 Kernel 2.6.22 The system start working correctly, but aleatory the asterisk prosess give a kernel panic with the messages: Process asterisk (pid: 7321, ti=dfed6000 task=f7dbf030 task.ti=dfed6000) Stack ......

Hello, Having a problem getting Centos to see my firewire connected camcorder. Here what I have thus far; Installed the kernek fron centos-plus and checked that libraw1394.x86_64 and libraw1394_8.x86_64 are installed Kernel i'm running is 2.6.9-34.106.unsupported here are some outputs from my machine; ~ $ lspci | grep -i firewire 00:07.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): VIA Technologies, Inc. IEEE

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=590 Summary: iptables unknown target data Product: iptables Version: CVS (please indicate timestamp) Platform: i386 OS/Version: Ubuntu Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: iptables AssignedTo: laforge at netfilter.org ReportedBy:

Hi, My asterisk server was working with a 4-FXO analog card (TDM400P). I recently added two digital cards: a TE120P (1 PRI) and a B410P (4 BRI). The B410P is still unconfigured but inserted in a PCI slot. The TE120P's jumper is set to E1 as it will connect to a commercial PBX's PRI card also configured as E1. My analog channels used to be 1-4 but since I added the new cards I changed

Helo, I'm trying to update a centos server with a kernel form the centos.plus repro because it contain Firewire/IEEE1394 support. But when y do a : # yum update The kernel from the base is more recent thant the centos plus repro I have tried with the http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/Priorities plug-in and it didn't take the right kernel :

Having done a current checkout, creating a new FS and running iozone [1] on it results in an oops [2]. remove_suid is called, accessing offset 14 of a NULL pointer. Let me know if you''d like me to test any fix, do further debugging or get more information. Thanks, Daniel --- [1] # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda4 # mount /dev/sda4 /mnt /mnt# iozone -a . --- [2] [ 899.118926] BUG: unable to

So my syslog filled up with this: Feb 8 06:47:59 mythbox upsd[3836]: Data for UPS [CyberPower] is stale - check driver Feb 8 06:47:59 mythbox upsd[3836]: UPS [CyberPower] data is no longer stale Feb 8 06:48:01 mythbox upsd[3836]: Data for UPS [CyberPower] is stale - check driver Feb 8 06:48:01 mythbox upsd[3836]: UPS [CyberPower] data is no longer stale Feb 8 06:48:03 mythbox upsd[3836]: Data

Hi, First of all, I'm new to ocfs2 and drbd. I set up two identical servers (Athlon64, 1GB RAM, GB-Ethernet) with Debian Etch, compiled my own kernel (2.6.16.20), then compiled the drbd-modules and ocfs (modules and tools) from source. The process of getting everything up and running was very easy. I have one big 140GB partition that is synced with drbd (in c-mode) and has an ocfs2

hi guys... im a new asterisk user. i dont understand why asterisk doesnt start. pls take a look at the output below. i could start it a couple of times .. #asterisk -gc Asterisk CVS-v1-0-01/21/05-14:58:31, Copyright (C) 1999-2004 Digium. Written by Mark Spencer <markster@digium.com> ========================================================================= [ Booting....................Jan

Hello, I am using Xen 4.0.0_21091_06-0.1 on OpenSuse 11.3 64 bit, with a Windows XP Pro SP3 32 bit guest, and my workstation keeping locking up, even the NumLock and CapsLock keys being unresponsive when it does. Where should I begin troubleshooting? Thanks, Todd CPU info: ___________________________________________________________________________ processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel

Hi... I have a Dell Latitute with an ATA/ATAPI-5 T13 1321D and it would seem that my disk access is extremely slow. I have the latest updated kernel from RedHat 8.0 kernel 2.4.18-27.8.0. Somehow I think it is related to the UDMA stuff (shows my level of understanding). I have run hdparm and although I think I should at least udma level 5, I have at most udma2 listed. Is this a kernel

While untar''ing an image to an sd card via a reader, I got the following bug. The system also has a btrfs root, and a whole swath of processes went into uninterruptable sleep. I was able to poke around via ssh and sysrq, and already had netconsole set up to capture the bug. Root fs is on /dev/sdi1, and /dev/sdj2 is the card reader which was the target of the untar. [29571.448889] sd

Hello all, I have a problem with Xen and FibreChannel. The Dom0 can''t export a Disk on a FibreChannel SAN-Box to the DomU''s. In the DomU configuration I try: disk = [ ''phy:/dev/sdb1,/dev/sda1,w'' ] or disk = [ ''file:/mnt/sambashare.img,sda1,w'' ] sambashare.img is a 512MB great Diskimage on a Partition on the FC-SAN-Box, the Dom0 mount this

I''ve just started playing with Btrfs, and I''m getting a log full of kernel warnings that look something like this: Feb 16 09:02:17 vlad kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------ Feb 16 09:02:17 vlad kernel: WARNING: at fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:815 clean_tree_block+0x9d/0xbb [btrfs]() Feb 16 09:02:17 vlad kernel: Hardware name: System Product Name Feb 16 09:02:17 vlad kernel:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=549 Summary: kernel oops when trying to remove ip_conntrack module Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Fedora Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: unknown AssignedTo:

Hello, I have encountered a crash in dom0 kernel while booting a domU from an AOE device. I haven''t seen such crashes when booting from local partitions/ LVM volumes/ loopback file systems. Also I haven''t seen such crash when I did repetitive I/O to these AOE devices. As the call trace of crash indicates the crash is in xenolinux kernel. Also this crash is predictably

Hi Recently I upgraded my kernel to 2.6.11 (debian) and applied some patches from pom-ng (netfilter) and the iproute2-ss050330 package I have been experiencing a lot of crashes in the kernel (snip below) ================================== Apr 5 20:00:21 sydlxfw01 kernel: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000221 Apr 5 20:00:21 sydlxfw01 kernel: printing eip: