Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches similar to: "Lemon drops"
2008 May 21
0
[LLVMdev] MultiSource/Applications/lemon slow in JIT
On May 21, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Török Edwin wrote:
> The forking was introduced because the runtime was too small;
I think this direction is wrong. I'd rather have some infrastructure
that can get nanoseconds or tick counters and print them... This then
allows for a microbenchmark suite, which I think fits in nicely with
the llvm philosophy.
2005 Oct 27
0
where is Jim Lemon? (PR#8259)
This concerns the contributed package "concord". Sorry to bother
you with it, but my attempt to contact the author/maintainer
failed (see below). Perhaps you can forward it, or let me
know where to send it.
Regards, Rob Kushler
------------------------------------------------------
This is the Postfix program at host tak.itd.uts.edu.au.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that
2014 Feb 18
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-test lemon
Does anyone know if this is a known xfail?
I'm getting a failure for Mips on this but at the same time,
ecmascript.y gets errors when running it through lemon for both gccx86
and llvm mips
so I don't know if the output is supposed to really compare or not.
(This test runs lemon on multiple input files and computes a hash of the
result and diffs the hash).
All inputs that are not
2008 May 21
3
[LLVMdev] MultiSource/Applications/lemon slow in JIT
Evan Cheng wrote:
> On May 21, 2008, at 6:09 AM, Matthijs Kooijman wrote:
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been toying around with the testsuite for a bit, and after
>> recompiling
>> llvm-gcc a bunch of times and fixing a nasty bashism bug, I actually
>> got it to
>> run and pass most tests.
>>
>> When running, I noticed a very long
2008 May 21
0
[LLVMdev] MultiSource/Applications/lemon slow in JIT
On May 21, 2008, at 6:09 AM, Matthijs Kooijman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been toying around with the testsuite for a bit, and after
> recompiling
> llvm-gcc a bunch of times and fixing a nasty bashism bug, I actually
> got it to
> run and pass most tests.
>
> When running, I noticed a very long runtime on the lemon test. At
> first I
> suspected an infinite
2008 May 21
4
[LLVMdev] MultiSource/Applications/lemon slow in JIT
Hi,
I've been toying around with the testsuite for a bit, and after recompiling
llvm-gcc a bunch of times and fixing a nasty bashism bug, I actually got it to
run and pass most tests.
When running, I noticed a very long runtime on the lemon test. At first I
suspected an infinite loop, but it turned out the test simply needed around
1000 seconds to run. Some investigation turned out that the