similar to: bug in methods' 'initialize' (or the functions called in turn) ?

hello all Im new to ruby and im just trying to see how i can instanciate an object that is defined in a class file like myclass.rb then in another file like start.rb i just call it like so newObj = myclass.new do i need the include statement at the top? like include myclass.rb or mayby the require statement? Thanks -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

For documentation we use a system that generates Rd files from special comments in the code. (inlinedocs). It is crucial to be able to get the defining source code for objects like methods to extract the comments from it. Here is an R session that shows how this works for several kinds of methods and (at the end of the session) how if fails for methods of "initialize" >

Hi again, Beside R_ParseVector()'s possible inconsistent behavior, R's handling of zero-length named elements does not seem consistent either: ``` > lst <- list() > lst[[""]] <- 1 > names(lst) [1] "" > list("" = 1) Error: attempt to use zero-length variable name ``` Should the parser be made to accept as valid what is otherwise possible

Dears, I have a question about copying reference objects using the initialize method. 1) If the latter has no arguments, there is no problem to copy an object. myClass = setRefClass("myClass", fields = list(value = "numeric") ) myClass$methods(initialize = function(...){ ? value <<- 1 ? callSuper(...) }) newObject = myClass$new() newObject$value = 2 copyObject =

Thanks for the quick response Tomas. The same error is indeed happening when trying to have a zero-length variable name in an environment. The surprising bit is then "why is this happening during parsing" (that is why are variables assigned to an environment) ? We are otherwise aware that the error is not occurring in the R console, but can be traced to a call to R_ParseVector() in

Hello, I don't see why you say that the documentation seems to be wrong: class(args(`+`)) #[1] "function" args() on a primitive does return a closure. At least in this case it does. Rui Barradas ?s 14:05 de 07/10/2018, Peter Dalgaard escreveu: > There is more "fun" afoot here, but I don't recall what the point may be: > >> args(get("+"))

rPython appears to provide an interface from R to Python by embedding Python and I'd think that it can safely assume that R has been initialized, but might not be the point here. The issue is that a Python package embedding itself R (here rpy2) appears to have no way to know that earlier in the life of the process R was initialized. 2015-05-03 19:48 GMT-04:00 Duncan Murdoch

Le lun. 9 d?c. 2019 ? 09:57, Tomas Kalibera <tomas.kalibera at gmail.com> a ?crit : > On 12/9/19 2:54 PM, Laurent Gautier wrote: > > > > Le lun. 9 d?c. 2019 ? 05:43, Tomas Kalibera <tomas.kalibera at gmail.com> a > ?crit : > >> On 12/7/19 10:32 PM, Laurent Gautier wrote: >> >> Thanks for the quick response Tomas. >> >> The same error

Hello All, I am getting confused with best practices. I posted a topic earlier but realized how confusing it was. Thus I will do my best to be as clear as possible. I am a bit confused on best practice for instanciate a variable that will be used accross several methods within the same controller. I need this because of AJAX, here is a description of what I intend to do: (all this in done

Hi Simon, Widespread errors would have caught my earlier as the way that code is using only one initialization of the embedded R, is used quite a bit, and is covered by quite a few unit tests. This is the only situation I am aware of in which an error occurs. What is a "correct context", or initial context, the code should from ? Searching for "context" in the R-exts manual

Hi, The behavior of ``` SEXP R_ParseVector(SEXP, int, ParseStatus *, SEXP); ``` defined in `src/include/R_ext/Parse.h` appears to be inconsistent depending on the string to be parsed. Trying to parse a string such as `"list(''=1+"` sets the `ParseStatus` to incomplete parsing error but trying to parse `"list(''=123"` will result in R sending a message to the

Le lun. 9 d?c. 2019 ? 05:43, Tomas Kalibera <tomas.kalibera at gmail.com> a ?crit : > On 12/7/19 10:32 PM, Laurent Gautier wrote: > > Thanks for the quick response Tomas. > > The same error is indeed happening when trying to have a zero-length > variable name in an environment. The surprising bit is then "why is this > happening during parsing" (that is why

I'm replying to a very old thread (9 years ago) here http://grokbase.com/t/xapian/xapian-discuss/072tprmr6h/php5-query-parsing-bug So not sure if that's going to end up being more or less readable... I have this error : Fatal error: No matching function for overloaded 'new_Query' in /usr/share/php/xapian.php on line 2607 Line 2607 (and surrounding) looks like this and are in

Hi, A short code example showing the warning might the only thing needed here: ``` > formals(args(`[`)) NULL *Warning message:In formals(fun) : argument is not a function* > is.function(`[`) [1] TRUE > is.primitive(`[`) [1] TRUE ``` Now with an other primitive: ``` > formals(args(`sum`)) $... $na.rm [1] FALSE > is.function(`sum`) [1] TRUE > is.primitive(`sum`) [1] TRUE

Dear list, I'm wondering if the following error I'm getting is a small bug in the Reference Class paradigm or if it makes perfect sense. When you write an explicit initialize method for a Ref Class, can you then make use of '.self' WITHIN this initialize method just as you would once an object of the class has actually been initialized? Because it seems to me that you can not.

> On Jan 1, 2017, at 5:12 PM, Laurent Gautier <lgautier at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > 2017-01-01 8:28 GMT-05:00 Prof Brian Ripley <ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk>: > On 29/12/2016 15:55, Simon Urbanek wrote: > The problem is elsewhere - Rinterface.h guards the ultima-ratio fallback with HAVE_UINTPTR_T but that config flag is not exported in Rconfig.h. Should be now

Hi, I was recently pointed out that a definition in Rinterface.h can be conflicting with a definition in stdint.h: /usr/include/R/Rinterface.h has: typedef unsigned long uintptr_t; /usr/include/stdint.h has: typedef unsigned int uintptr_t; (when 32bit platform complete definition is: #if __WORDSIZE == 64 # ifndef __intptr_t_defined typedef long int intptr_t; # define

On 29/12/2016 15:55, Simon Urbanek wrote: > The problem is elsewhere - Rinterface.h guards the ultima-ratio fallback with HAVE_UINTPTR_T but that config flag is not exported in Rconfig.h. Should be now fixed in R-devel - please check if that works for you. Rconfig.h would be appropriate if Rinterface.h is being included from C code using the same compiler as used for R. But as Rinterface.h

On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 8:06 PM, Vince Hsu <vinceh at nvidia.com> wrote: > The IOMMU physical translation bit might vary with different SoCs. So add > a variable to specify this bit for GK20A. > > Signed-off-by: Vince Hsu <vinceh at nvidia.com> > --- > drm/nouveau/nouveau_platform.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ > drm/nouveau/nouveau_platform.h | 1 + > 2 files

Hi, When starting an embedded R I encounter the following issue under certain conditions: ``` Error: package or namespace load failed for ?utils? in if (.identC(class1, class2) || .identC(class2, "ANY")) TRUE else {: missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed ``` (more such errors for grDevices, graphics, and stats) And in the end: ``` Warning messages: 1: package ?utils? in