similar to: Run up to R 2.0.0 for package maintainers

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "Run up to R 2.0.0 for package maintainers"

2004 Jul 06
1
Download Info
Maybe somebody can help me with the following questions: I have submitted Rmetrics to the CRAN server and was looking what happened. 1) The */contrib/checkSummary.html shows a table which reports the daily package check results. For my packages there is no entry in the column "r-devel", the other packages have "OK" or "WARN". What does it mean? 2) The link to
2004 Sep 13
1
Rd files with "%" (was: permuting dimensions)
Professor Ripley thanks for this. Very much appreciated. The original subject line reflected my late-night conviction that the answer might involve passing a strange list to do.call(). Anyway, package magic is broken (only in R-devel, I might add) because I have a function called "%eq%". R-2.0.0 CMD check is stopping (I think) because it interprets the "%" as a
2004 Oct 06
6
lattice package for R 2.0.0
Dear all, I am trying to install packages with the new R 2.0.0. However for several packages, like MASS, lattice or R2HTML, I get an error like: > library(lattice) Error in library(lattice) : 'lattice' is not a valid package -- installed < 2.0.0? > However, I have just downloaded the latest versions from CRAN. As far as lattice is concerned, it seems that the Windows binary is
2011 Nov 29
3
Updated Windows toolchain
An updated toolchain is now being used for Windows' builds of R-devel: details are in the R-admin manual and at http://www.murdoch-sutherland.com/Rtools/ and http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/Rtools/ Both 32- and 64-bit parts of the toolchain use v2.0.1 of the Mingw-w64 project's runtime and a beta of gcc 4.5.4: the Mingw.org project's builds are no longer used. This should mean that
2007 Apr 12
1
Milestone: 1000 packages on CRAN as of today(?)
Hi, I was just looking at the "CRAN Daily Package Check Results" [http://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/checkSummary.html], and realized there are 1000 packages on CRAN as of today (look at row 3 in the table below). Yet another quite extraordinary milestone in R history. Last updated on 2007-04-12 11:48:32 Results for installing and checking packages using the three current flavors
2004 Oct 18
2
why package gregmisc did not work
Dear useR I want to know why package gregmisc did not work very well. I did not find this package in my library directory. > local({a <- CRAN.packages() + install.packages(select.list(a[,1],,TRUE), .libPaths()[1], available=a, dependencies=TRUE)}) trying URL `http://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/contrib/2.0/PACKAGES' Content type `text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1' length 21630 bytes
2005 Oct 27
2
how to predict with logistic model in package logistf ?
dear community, I am a beginer in R , and can't predict with logistic model in package logistf, could anyone help me ? thanks ! the following is my command and result : >library(logistf) >data(sex2) >fit<-logistf(case ~ age+oc+vic+vicl+vis+dia, data=sex2) >predict(fit,newdata=sex2) Error in predict(fit, newdata = sex2) : no applicable method for "predict"
2004 Jan 25
3
orphaned packages
Are there many packages that are orphaned, and have a better "half" much like bootstrap? Is there a listing, or directory of "recommended" packages (other than the packages downloaded with the initial R install)? Thanks, Neil Eastep. An "R" newbie ----------- Prof Brian Ripley <ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk> writes: >>Package bootstrap is orphaned, that
2013 Feb 27
1
Separation issue in binary response models - glm, brglm, logistf
Dear all, I am encountering some issues with my data and need some help. I am trying to run glm analysis with a presence/absence variable as response variable and several explanatory variable (time, location, presence/absence data, abundance data). First I tried to use the glm() function, however I was having 2 warnings concerning glm.fit () : # 1: glm.fit: algorithm did not converge # 2:
2011 Sep 27
1
model selection using logistf package
Hi everyone, I'm wondering how to select the "best" model when using logistf? AIC does not work neither does anova. I tried fitting a glm model but got the separation warning message so I tried using the logistf package but as I stepwise simplify the model I don't know if the simplification is motivated or not... Can anyone explain to me how I should approach this problem? I
2006 Nov 16
5
<RBloomberg Package Problem>
Hi R-Experts, I'm currently using R 2.4.0 in Windows XP. I'm trying to download data from Bloomberg using the package "RBloomberg", but it fails to install the three needed packages "zoo", "chron" and 'Rbloomberg". Moreover I am not able to find "RBloomberg" package as windows binary in CRAN site as only for MAC it's given. Please
2010 Mar 09
1
penalized maximum likelihood estimation and logistf
Hi, I got two questions and would really appreciate any help from here. First, is the penalized maximum likelihood estimation(Firth Type Estimation) only fit for binary response (0,1 or TRUE, FALSE)? Can it be applied to multinomial logistic regression? If yes, what's the formula for LL and U(beta_i)? Can someone point me to the right reference? Second, when I used *logistf *on a dataset with
2005 Jan 14
1
XML
I thought I would take a look at the StatDataML package for some work I'm doing, but I receive the following error when starting: > version _ platform i386-pc-mingw32 arch i386 os mingw32 system i386, mingw32 status major 2 minor 0.1 year 2004 month 11
2002 Oct 28
2
RFC: no automatic updates of packages with major version change
We (Kurt Hornik, Brian Ripley & I) want to propose the following change to the automatic package updating mechanisms of R: A major version number change of a package will by default disable the automatic updating of packages, because the interface of the package might have changed and hence old code might not run anymore. A recent example was the release of mclust version 2.0, which is not
2004 Sep 09
2
Rd syntax error detected in CRAN daily checks
Please forgive me if you already received this. I had an e-mail sending glitch this morning. http://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/checkSummary.html reported an error in Design.trans.Rd * checking Rd files ... ERROR Rd files with syntax errors: /var/mnt/hda3/R.check/r-devel/PKGS/Design/man/Design.trans.Rd: unterminated section 'alias' The .Rd file is attached. It begins
2005 Feb 07
3
problem with logistic regression
Hi, we try to do a logistic regression with the function glm. But we notice that this function don't give the same results as the SAS proc catmod (differents estimate given). We try to change the contrast on R system with: > options(contrasts=c(unordered="contr.SAS",ordered="contr.poly")) We also try with brlr and logistf functions. Unfortunately, the estimate
2004 Nov 05
1
Error message from vignette strucchange-intro example
Hello, I am just studying the following example from vignette: strucchange-intro, contineousely ending up in an error. This is the given code: 1. library(strucchange) 2. data(USIncExp) 3. if (!"package:stats" %in% search()) library(ts) 4. USIncExp2 <- window(USIncExp, start = c(1985, 12)) A.Modelling: coint.res <- residuals(lm(expenditure ~ income, data = USIncExp2))
2007 Sep 30
1
Ryacas check
When I do Rcmd check Ryacas on my Windows Vista system under R version 2.6.0 beta (2007-09-23 r42958) it checks out fine but here: http://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/contrib/checkSummaryWin.html http://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/contrib/2.5/check/Ryacas-check.log it complains about the XML package even though the XML package *is* declared in the DESCRIPTION file. What is
2004 Mar 22
1
Re: CRAN packages maintained by you (subscripting problem under 1.9.0.alpha?)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by hypatia.math.ethz.ch id i2MH38ro020355 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on hypatia.math.ethz.ch X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET autolearn=no
2005 Feb 21
4
rnorm??
I am wondering whether there is a bug in rnorm. When generating rnorm(1000000) and counting the cases > 4 and the cases < (-4) I get rather unexpectedly low counts for the latter. The problem goes away when using qnorm(runif(1000000)). Fritz Scholz, PhD Applied Statistics Group Boeing Phantom Works fritz.scholz at pss.boeing.com 425-865-3623 Tu/We 206-542-6545 (most likely)