similar to: fedora core 2 + bitmap() + ghostscript (PR#7062)

Just tried to run a perl script to do some ripping and converting of a postscript file, and ghostscript bombed out with the error message below. Can someone tell me is this really a ghostscript error, or is there more to it than this? If need be, I can attach the perl script that caused the error, but I think it is OK. Don't have another machine to test it on. Oh yeah, FWIW, this is an

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0096 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0096.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 9f4f2e2c9950825395792ccafe52ce143e0c03804768006eaa16cb03ab985f26 ghostscript-7.07-33.13.el4.i386.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0155 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0155.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/ghostscript-7.07-33.2.c4.1.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/ghostscript-devel-7.07-33.2.c4.1.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/ghostscript-gtk-7.07-33.2.c4.1.s390.rpm s390x:

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0345 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0345.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/ghostscript-7.07-33.2.c4.5.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/ghostscript-devel-7.07-33.2.c4.5.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/ghostscript-gtk-7.07-33.2.c4.5.s390.rpm s390x:

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0420 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0420.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/ghostscript-7.07-33.2.c4.8.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/ghostscript-devel-7.07-33.2.c4.8.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/ghostscript-gtk-7.07-33.2.c4.8.s390.rpm s390x:

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0155 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0155.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: ghostscript-7.07-33.2.el4_6.1.i386.rpm ghostscript-7.07-33.2.el4_6.1.x86_64.rpm ghostscript-devel-7.07-33.2.el4_6.1.x86_64.rpm ghostscript-gtk-7.07-33.2.el4_6.1.x86_64.rpm src:

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0345 Moderate https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0345.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: ghostscript-7.07-33.2.el4_7.5.i386.rpm ghostscript-7.07-33.2.el4_7.5.x86_64.rpm ghostscript-devel-7.07-33.2.el4_7.5.x86_64.rpm ghostscript-gtk-7.07-33.2.el4_7.5.x86_64.rpm src:

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0420 Moderate https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0420.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: ghostscript-7.07-33.2.el4_7.8.i386.rpm ghostscript-7.07-33.2.el4_7.8.x86_64.rpm ghostscript-devel-7.07-33.2.el4_7.8.x86_64.rpm ghostscript-gtk-7.07-33.2.el4_7.8.x86_64.rpm src:

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0155 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0155.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: ghostscript-7.07-33.2.el4_6.1.i386.rpm ghostscript-devel-7.07-33.2.el4_6.1.i386.rpm ghostscript-gtk-7.07-33.2.el4_6.1.i386.rpm src: ghostscript-7.07-33.2.el4_6.1.src.rpm -------------- next part

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0345 Moderate https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0345.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: ghostscript-7.07-33.2.el4_7.5.i386.rpm ghostscript-devel-7.07-33.2.el4_7.5.i386.rpm ghostscript-gtk-7.07-33.2.el4_7.5.i386.rpm src: ghostscript-7.07-33.2.el4_7.5.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0420 Moderate https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0420.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: ghostscript-7.07-33.2.el4_7.8.i386.rpm ghostscript-devel-7.07-33.2.el4_7.8.i386.rpm ghostscript-gtk-7.07-33.2.el4_7.8.i386.rpm src: ghostscript-7.07-33.2.el4_7.8.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh

Hi, Back in 1997 the list was full of tips on making Microsoft Visual C++ Studio (v6) use files over Samba (v2.2.2 on Solaris). Could someone please point me to the definitive answers... (beyond speed.txt?) and their current status. We have an added complication of having 5 developers using each NT4 box over citrix/Terminalserver. Some days we are fine, but some days we slow to a crawl of over a

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0155 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0155.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/ghostscript-7.07-33.2.c4.1.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/ghostscript-devel-7.07-33.2.c4.1.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/ghostscript-gtk-7.07-33.2.c4.1.ia64.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - upi at

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0345 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0345.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/ghostscript-7.07-33.2.c4.5.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/ghostscript-devel-7.07-33.2.c4.5.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/ghostscript-gtk-7.07-33.2.c4.5.ia64.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - upi at

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0420 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0420.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/ghostscript-7.07-33.2.c4.8.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/ghostscript-devel-7.07-33.2.c4.8.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/ghostscript-gtk-7.07-33.2.c4.8.ia64.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - upi at

while doing yum install ghostscript to a centos 4.3 x86_64 I have the following error: ============================================================================= Package Arch Version Repository Size ============================================================================= Installing: ghostscript i386 7.07-33 base

Hi folks, Ok, I've seen this question go unanswered on the mailing list, and I assume it's because no one had the heart to break the bad news to the guy asking, but be honest with me, I can take it. At this time it's flat impossible to have multiple IAX phones behind a NAT without using an * gateway because there's no way to have a client listen on a port besides 4569. Is

Hi Think this is probably straightforward, but I don''t know enough about rails to work it out, so was wondering if anyone can help I keep on running into this error when I''m deploying my app: "FastCGI: server ".../public_html/public/dispatch.fcgi" stderr: ../config/../app/views/items/_side_share.rhtml:8: warning: Object#id will be deprecated; use

Hi all, I have two sets: dig<-c("DAVID ADAMS","PIERS AKERMAN","SHERYLE BAGWELL","JULIAN BAJKOWSKI","CANDIDA BAKER") import<-c("by DAVID ADAMS","piersAKERMAN","SHERYLE BagWEL","JULIAN BAJKOWSKI with ","Cand BAKER","smith green")     I want to get the following result from

Hi all, Due to a security breach at my office recently, we need to log successful / failed log-ins.? I've put in "log level = 3" in smb.conf on our active directory domain controller which seems to log what we need, however this is generating massive log files, due to it logging every file opening/closing by all users.? How do I log successful/failed log-ins without having to