similar to: Weirdness with choose.files on Microsoft Windows (PR#6818)

Dear R-Community! The example "oats" in MASS (2nd edition, 10.3, p.309) is calculated for aov and lme without interaction term and the results are the same. But I have problems to reproduce the example aov with interaction in MASS (10.2, p.301) with lme. Here the script: library(MASS) library(nlme) options(contrasts = c("contr.treatment", "contr.poly")) # aov: Y ~

Dear List, I have been using R to create an xyplot using the panel function within lattice libraries. This plot is based on the data supplied in R named 'Oats'. The graph represents oat yield by nitro level with an overlay of each variety of oats for each nitro level. I have three questions regarding this graph: 1) I cannot seem to specify the type of symbol used by the plot, even though

Dear R users, this is a follow up of this message http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/e6/help/09/05/13897.html I'm reproducing the core of it for convenience. > // > / data(Oats, package = "MEMSS") / > / tp1.oats <- xyplot(yield ~ nitro | Variety + Block, / > / data = Oats, / > / panel = function(x, y, subscripts, ...) { /

The following code produces a legend ("key") that mentions the unused levels of Block. library(MEMSS) xyplot(yield~nitro, subset=(Block=="I" | Block=="II"), data=Oats, group=Block, auto.key=T) and adding "drop.unused.levels=T" does not fix it. And in fact even the following does not solve the problem: xyplot(yield~nitro,

I am trying to do Tukey HSD comparisons on a repeated measures expt. I found the following example on r-help and quoted approvingly elsewhere. It is broken. Can anyone please tell me how to get it to work? I am using R 2.4.1. > require(MASS) ## for oats data set > require(nlme) ## for lme() > require(multcomp) ## for multiple comparison stuff > Aov.mod <- aov(Y ~ N + V +

Dear all, Consider a completely randomized block design (let's use data(Oats) irrespoctive of the split-plot design it was arranged in). Look: library(nlme) fit <- lme(yield ~ nitro, Oats, random = ~1|Block, method="ML") fit2 <- lm(yield ~ nitro + Block, Oats) anova(fit, fit2) gives this: Model df AIC BIC logLik Test L.Ratio p-value fit 1 4 624.3245

When we call a lattice function such as xyplot, to what extent does the "data" designation cause the function to look inside the "data" for variables? In the examples below, the "subset" argument understands that "Variety" is a variable in the data. But the "scales" argument does not understand that "nitro" is a variable in the data.

Dear R users, I have a question about the patterned variance-covariance structure for the random effects in linear mixed effect model. I am reading section 4.2.2 of "Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-Plus" by Jose Pinheiro and Douglas Bates. There is an example of defining a compound symmetry variance-covariance structure for the random effects in a split-plot experiment on varieties of

Hi use Rs, I have a csv file: "1989-90","1990-91" Barley,23,34 Oats,15,16 Which I want to turn into: year, Barley, Oats 1 "1989-90", 23, 15 2 "1990-91",34,16 Transpose doesn't quite do it, is there a standard way? Cheers, Geoff Russell

Hi all, I have a problem in that when I plot points that have a high degree of precision, some significant rounding seems to occur, resulting in uneccessary overlap of my points. Is there a way to specify the resolution or precision in plotting functions? Is there an underlying grid I have to modify somehow? Many Thanks, Jon -- Mares eat oats and does eat oats and little lambs eat ivy. A

Hello, can anybody tell me how to produce a plot like the one in http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/vignettes/Implementation.pdf on page 13, Figure 6? The data is stored in: library(nlme) data(Oats) Cheers -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Help-needed-in-reproducing-a-plot-tp4119603p4119603.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at

Usage data(gasoline) Format A data frame with 60 observations on the following 2 variables. octane a numeric vector. The octane number. NIR a matrix with 401 columns. The NIR spectrum and I see the gasoline data to see below NIR.1686 nm NIR.1688 nm NIR.1690 nm NIR.1692 nm NIR.1694 nm NIR.1696 nm NIR.1698 nm NIR.1700 nm 1 1.242645 1.250789 1.246626 1.250985 1.264189 1.244678 1.245913

I have two ideas about it. 1- i) Entering variables in quadratic form is done with the command I (variable ^ 2) - plsr (octane ~ NIR + I (nir ^ 2), ncomp = 10, data = gasTrain, validation = "LOO" You could also use a new variable NIR_sq <- (NIR) ^ 2 ii) To insert a square variable, use syntax I (x ^ 2) - it is very important to insert I before the parentheses. iii) If you want to

Below. -- Bert Bert Gunter On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 3:07 AM, Luigi Biagini <luigi.biagini at gmail.com> wrote: > I have two ideas about it. > > 1- > i) Entering variables in quadratic form is done with the command I > (variable ^ 2) - > plsr (octane ~ NIR + I (nir ^ 2), ncomp = 10, data = gasTrain, validation = > "LOO" > You could also use a new variable

> On Jul 13, 2017, at 7:43 AM, Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Below. > > -- Bert > Bert Gunter > > > > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 3:07 AM, Luigi Biagini <luigi.biagini at gmail.com> wrote: >> I have two ideas about it. >> >> 1- >> i) Entering variables in quadratic form is done with the command I >>

Dear all, I'm analysing a split-plot experiment, where there are sometimes one or two values missing. I realized that if the data is slightly unbalanced, the effect of the subplot-treatment will also appear and be tested against the mainplot-error term. I replicated this with the Oats dataset from Yates (1935), contained in the nlme package, where Variety is on mainplot, and nitro on

?? If I haven't misunderstood, they are completely different! 1) NIR must be a matrix, or poly(NIR,...) will fail. 2) Due to the previously identified bug in poly, degree must be explicitly given as poly(NIR, degree =2,raw = TRUE). Now consider the following example: > df <-matrix(runif(60),ncol=3) > y <- runif(20) > mdl1 <-lm(y~df*I(df^2)) > mdl2

Hi list, I am looking at the data yarn in package, I don't understand what is dimension of this data set. I did the following: > library(pls) > data(yarn) > dim(yarn) [1] 28 3 > head(yarn) NIR.1 NIR.2 NIR.3 NIR.4 NIR.5 NIR.6 NIR.7 NIR.8 NIR.9 NIR.10 NIR.11 1 3.06630 3.08610 3.10790 3.09720 2.99790 2.82730 2.62330 2.40390 2.19310 2.00580 1.83790 2

Hello, I'm playing around with the PLS package and found a data set (NIR) whose structure I don't understand. Forgive me if this is a stupid question, as I feel like it must be since I am less experienced with aspects of modeling. My problem, the pls NIR data frame does not seem to be a typical data frame as, while it is a list, its variables are not of equal length. Furthermore, I have

Dear all, I am using the pls package of R to perform partial least square on a set of multivariate data. Instead of fitting a linear model, I want to fit my data with a quadratic function with interaction terms. But I am not sure how. I will use an example to illustrate my problem: Following the example in the PLS manual: ## Read data data(gasoline) gasTrain <- gasoline[1:50,] ## Perform