similar to: Recursive indexing can cause R-1.8.0 (and R-1.7.1) to (PR#4647)

Recursive indexing can cause R-1.8.0 (and R-1.7.1) to segment fault First of all, many thanks to the R team!! R is really a software for everyday work. Yes, I've found a fault, but I hope it's not just faultfinding ;-) In the NEWS file of R-1.8.0, first printed in R NEWS 1.7.1, there was given a promise: [ 1 ] o Recursive indexing of lists is allowed, so x[[c(4,2)]] is

I am having difficulty using in 1.8.0 an object created under 1.7.1. The following is a 'minimal example' of the issue. First the part in 1.7.1: > require("methods") [1] TRUE > setClass("foo",representation("vector",label="character")) [1] "foo" > x <- new("foo",1:2,label=LETTERS[1:2]) >

Dear R-help, A colleague of mine was running some code on two of our boxes, and noticed a rather large difference in running time. We've so far isolated the problem to the difference between R 1.7.1 and 1.8.0, but not more than that. The exact same code took 933.5 seconds in 1.7.1, and 3594.4 seconds in 1.8.1, on the same box. Basically, the code calls boot() to bootstrap fitting mixture

I'm setting up a smaba/ldap server and I'd really like "regular" samba users to not have local login privs. (LDAP will handle all unix and samba accounts.) So, to that end, I thought changing the options in smbldap.conf, specifically... userLoginShell="/bin/bash" to something like userLoginShell="/sbin/nologin" Is there some unanticipated impact that would

Dear all Colleague of mine ask me if R is capable of Andrews plot like andrewsplot(x) in Matlab. Quick search did not reveal anything but before I start to write any routine I would like to ask this ingenious audience if there is any implementation of Andrews plots somewhere. I know about parallel coordinate plots in lattice (although I do not use them as I am not sure what the plot tells

On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, [ISO-8859-1] Török Edwin wrote: >> Another question to ask, is why that function became so large in the >> first place [X86DAGToDAGISel::SelectCode(llvm::SDOperand)] >> We have inline limits, don't we? > > most of functions called by SelectCode get a -30000 cost reduction > because they are internal. > Even if Caller.size() is 40000, the

2005 APPLIED QUANTITATIVE ANALYTICS IN FINANCE EVENT o OCTOBER 6, 2005 o LONDON Please join us at the Museum of London for a series of guru-led presentations, networking, and demonstrations by academic and business thought leaders in finance from Basel II Committee, Swiss Union of Raiffeisen Banks, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) in Zurich, UBS Warburg, Ingenious Media Plc. and

On Apr 14, 2008, at 10:43 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, [ISO-8859-1] Török Edwin wrote: >>> Another question to ask, is why that function became so large in the >>> first place [X86DAGToDAGISel::SelectCode(llvm::SDOperand)] >>> We have inline limits, don't we? >> >> most of functions called by SelectCode get a -30000 cost reduction

On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, Evan Cheng wrote: >> This sounds like unanticipated fallout from Evan's recent tweaks of the >> inliner. Evan, thoughts? > > Previously the inliner assign each basic block cost of 20. So this line is > simply estimating the number of caller basic blocks. My tweak simply removed > the number of basic blocks from the equation so the cost of a

I am getting an unanticipated result attempting to format a datetime string date1 <- strptime('2005 297 1030 35', '%Y %j %H%M %S') # returns "2005-10-24 10:12:35" date2 <- strptime('2005 297 912 35', '%Y %j %H%M %S') # returns NA Are there any ways to adjust the format argument (e.g., '%H') to accept one or two digit hours?

Am 30.09.2010 00:34, schrieb Chris Lattner: > > The format is literally a bitstream, not a bytestream. See this document for more details: > http://llvm.org/docs/BitCodeFormat.html Ah... something I always meant to ask: How does the LLVM infrastructure deal with the added overhead of packing/unpacking a bitstream? Ignore it since modern CPUs can deal with that? Some ingenious

Evan Cheng wrote: > On Apr 14, 2008, at 10:43 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > >> On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, [ISO-8859-1] Török Edwin wrote: >> >>>> Another question to ask, is why that function became so large in the >>>> first place [X86DAGToDAGISel::SelectCode(llvm::SDOperand)] >>>> We have inline limits, don't we? >>>>

Hi all, I have a couple of Samba 4 DCs on my network and I created a new service account LDAPReader on my DCs that my non-Samba third-party services such as Redmine successfully use to access AD via the LDAPS protocol. I have a couple of questions that relate to having service account of this nature implemented in Samba and I wondered if the group could possibly provide some advice? 1)

libosinfo 1.8.0 declares them automatically for all of its classes, so there is no need to declare ours. This requires fixing the definition of the IS_LIBOSINFO_VERSION macro to wrap its body in brackets. While in the process, simplify the workaround for a related bug by removing a now-useless check. --- v2v/libosinfo-c.c | 11 +++++++++-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff

Full_Name: Ian Wilson Version: R-1.8.0 OS: Windows (but own compilation) Submission from: (NULL) (139.133.7.38) the p-value is incorrect for cor.test using method "spearman" in R-1.8.0. This was not the case in R-1.7.1. Version R-1.8.0 on Windows > cor.test(rnorm(50),rnorm(50),method="spearman") Spearman's rank correlation rho data: rnorm(50) and rnorm(50) S

Greetings, R-Wizards: I'm trying to find an extremum subject to a nonlinear constraint. (Yes, I have perused the archives but have found nothing positive.) The details of the problem are these: In a paper published some years ago in Technometrics, ("Confidence bands for cumulative distribution functions of continuous random variables" Technometrics, 25, 77-86. 1983), Cheng and

I am having problems porting a package to R-1.8.0 where I have complex S4 classes with slots inheriting from POSIXct. For example: > setClass("test1", representation(date="POSIXct")) [1] "test1" > new("test1", date=as.POSIXct("2003-10-09")) Error in ext@test(object) : couldn't find function "%in %" Under R-1.7.1 this worked

Due to some unanticipated system problems, cvsup8.FreeBSD.org will be out of service until futher notice. John --- John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam Trungpa This is the moderated mailing list

Hi all, We're completely stuck helpless with our CentOS system which we've been using as a VM server. After an unanticipated system upgrade, we can't get virsh or virt-manager to connect to libvirt anymore. It gets completely stuck during startup, trying to connect. One of the suspicious things we've seen is the following: [root at ana libvirt]# netstat | grep

On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 15:21:13 +0100 Stephen via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi all, I have a couple of Samba 4 DCs on my network and I created a > new service account LDAPReader on my DCs that my non-Samba > third-party services such as Redmine successfully use to access AD > via the LDAPS protocol. > > I have a couple of questions that relate to having