similar to: Unpredictable EPS->PDF rotation (PR#4460)

Hi, I have found references for the following problem in the list archives, but no nice solution. So I decided to post one I came up with. The problem is that graphs output as eps files, for example using ps.options(onefile=FALSE, paper="special", width=8, height=8, horizontal=FALSE, pointsize=12) get rotated when I convert them to pdf using epstopdf. Both ghostview and

Dear R developers: The following R program produces a pdf file that does not survive ghostscript distillation correctly. The undistilled version is at http://welch.econ.brown.edu/temp/try.PDF while the distilled version is at http://welch.econ.brown.edu/temp/try.pdf . When previewed, the points are wrong in the distilled .pdf version, but only in one of the two points invokations (huh?) . The

hello, i have a problem with the orientation of eps files produced with the postscript() command. i have generated some eps files with R using: postscript(file = filename, horizontal = FALSE, paper = "special", onefile = F ALSE, height = height, width = width, pointsize = pointsize) now, when i include these eps files into a standard paper document (ie. a4 paper, portrait orientation)

I've created a bunch of postscript trees (post.rpart), which I subsequently edit in Adobe Acrobat 4.05 (I need additional labelling that isn't easy to add with R). After editing the labels and annotations using Acrobat, I then export the file to Adobe's .eps format so I can insert the picture into a Microsoft Word 2000 document. The .pdf file distilled from the .ps file is

Hello, I get a nice looking barplot using the barplot2 function in the gregmisc package: body2 <- barplot2(hh3, beside = TRUE, col = c("mistyrose", "lightcyan"), .... cex.names = 1.0, plot.ci = TRUE, ci.l = cil, ci.u = ciu, plot.grid = TRUE) box() However, obviously I lose the collors when converting from ps to a pdf (outside of R)

Hi list, this question has probably been answered but I haven't found a solution in the archives: The older ghostscript gs5.50 (debian,stable) deals well with R-plots: epstopdf yields pdfs with the same orientation as the eps-file. But, since gs6.5 (or earlier) the dimension of the plot is interpreted: if x-width exceeds y-width even a Portrait-eps is rotated to Landscape. A possible

I use the following function to export some figures to .eps: p.eps <- function(p, fname, title = NULL, width, height) { postscript(file=fname, onefile=FALSE, paper="special", width=width, height=height, horizontal=FALSE) print(p + opts(title = title)) dev.off() } Whenever I have a page consisting of *only* figures exported in this way, Acrobat Reader shows them in

it seems that word can not read encapsupalted postscripts generated by R I used this command postscript("output.eps",horizontal=F,onefile=TRUE) since onefile=TRUE produces an encapsualted postscript actually what I'm trying to do is to insert the postsript file into a word document since other formats like jpeg and bmp do not reproduce the same quality like postscript formats any

I have tried to find a neat way to include graphs from R in LaTeX documents, but have not succeeded (I work with a WinEdt/MikTeX combination). The two roads I have stumbled along so far are the following: *Generate postscript files and convert them into EPS files by means of GhostScript or other not so straightforward tools. *Generate pictex files and include these. None of these solutions have

Dear list, I am trying to make eps file with embedded font. I use: postscript("ranking-exp-all.eps", horizontal=TRUE, onefile=FALSE, paper="special", height=8, width=12, family="Helvetica") # plot stuff dev.off() since R does not embed font, I then use: embedFonts(file="indegdistr.eps", outfile="indegdistrEMB.eps",

Dear Colleagues: I need to make a graphic that uses the Nimbus rather than Helvetica font family so that the font can be embedded in the encapsulated postscript file. This is to satisfy a requirement from a journal for electronic submission of figures. I do the following: postscript('lowess.eps', onefile=FALSE, pointsize=18, horizontal=FALSE, family='NimbusSan')

Hi, I am VERY interested in getting the xfig driver so that I can edit graphical output from R. Searching through the mail archives and reading documentation isn't helping. Is there or isn't there a working driver for this purpose. How can I get it? I tried looking at the development version of the tarballs, but I didn't find anything that looked promising in there. Also, does

dear R wizards--- I would like to do some book-on-demand printing at a popular printer named lulu, but lulu requires inclusion even of the basic postscript fonts. Interestingly, my book itself does not need the 14 base acrobat fonts, only the embedded R figures do. Of course, I really would like to get pdftex to embed the fonts, but how to do this is not obvious either. [This method seems

R Users, I have created a multipage PostScript file using the postscript() function with horizontal = TRUE to produce my plots in landscape. I intended to convert that entire file to PDF using ps2pdf to have the plots available for a presentation. Unfortunately, the resulting PDF document is rotated -90 degrees. I have found dozens of references to this kind of problem with ps2pdf online, but

Hi, I created a PDFPrinter as per http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=samba&m=105301236523413&w=2 I have another question, do I need to add a Color Laser Printer Driver in W2K to the PDF share to generate color PDF in Windows? Regards, Norman

Hi there, I've hit a bump in writing postscript files with special characters in the WinAnsi encoding on a windows machine. Here's some sample code: ########################################### postscript(file = "test.eps", encoding="WinAnsi.enc", width = 3, height = 5.5, onefile = TRUE, horizontal=FALSE, family = "sans", title =

The same problem I am having has been reported here http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/devel/04a/0344.html Namely that using par(mfg=...) with a postscript (eps) for inclusion with latex makes the figure appear upside down and back to front (flipped)! Converting the dvi to ps makes matters worse (the eps seems to be broken), however, it appears fine with gv. Here is (basically) the code I am

The same problem I am having has been reported here http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/devel/04a/0344.html Namely that using par(mfg=...) with a postscript (eps) for inclusion with latex makes the figure appear upside down and back to front (flipped)! Converting the dvi to ps makes matters worse (the eps seems to be broken), however, it appears fine with gv. Here is (basically) the code I am

I'm trying to use the pictex driver for bargraphs, and the shading isn't showing up. Is there any way to get some sort of shading in the plots? A hatch or stipple would be fine, too; just some way to differentiate the bars. The postscript driver won't do, since I'm trying to embed this in a LaTeX document which I'll use pdflatex on and \includegraphics for pdftex doesn't

Hi This is the 2nd time I am posting this question as I never got a reply the 1st time round - apologies to anybody who might take offense at this but I dont know what else to do. I am struggling to split up the plots of the grouped objects in nlme in a usable way. The standard plot command generates plots for each group on a single page. When there are many groups however this does not look