Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "[ENH] Clarify rsync flavors (PR#2886)"
2013 Sep 18
2
[LLVMdev] [lld][Options] Sharing common options across flavors
Hi Nick,
There are already a lot of options that are being shared across various
flavors. Adding a new option becomes a issue when that option need to
available across all flavors.
As the first step, I am thinking of consolidating the common options
shared across all the Unix variant flavors in CommonOptions.td.
The options that are shared between Darwin/GnuLD are :-
a) -o
b) -L
c)
2013 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] [lld][Options] Sharing common options across flavors
On Sep 18, 2013, at 12:18 PM, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at codeaurora.org> wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> There are already a lot of options that are being shared across various flavors. Adding a new option becomes a issue when that option need to available across all flavors.
>
> As the first step, I am thinking of consolidating the common options shared across all the Unix
2003 Apr 30
2
make check failures (PR#2884)
R Version 1.7.0 Patched (2003-04-28), built on Solaris 2.8
with gcc 3.0.3.
Obtained via rsync -rC rsync.r-project.org::r-patched R
I'm not sure how signficant these difference are during development,
but after an apparently successful build I got the following
discrepancies in make check:
make[3]: Entering directory `/export/home/ross/src/R/tests'
running code in 'reg-tests-1.R'
2013 Sep 26
1
[LLVMdev] adding multiple flavors to test suite
I have some test scripts I use for testing floating point
interoperability between mips16 and mips32.
There are lots of combinations and there are subtle issues that make
them slightly different and they need to all be tested.
For a very basic test, I have a program which has a sample function of
all floating point signatures that are effected by this. Basically an
ABI test for this.
This
2013 Sep 18
1
[LLVMdev] [lld][Options] Sharing common options across flavors
On 9/18/2013 4:31 PM, Nick Kledzik wrote:
> On Sep 18, 2013, at 12:18 PM, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Nick,
>>
>> There are already a lot of options that are being shared across various flavors. Adding a new option becomes a issue when that option need to available across all flavors.
>>
>> As the first step, I am thinking
2014 Oct 08
2
[LLVMdev] [lld] lld build needs to have flags that specify what flavor/targets to build ?
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Alex Rosenberg <alexr at leftfield.org> wrote:
> This it totally "armchair quarterbacking," but I am a little frustrated
> that we've come to conflate flavors and targets.
>
> The original intent of flavors was to internally translate each flavor
> into a neutral lld-native command line syntax. We now have baked in
>
2014 Oct 07
3
[LLVMdev] [lld] lld build needs to have flags that specify what flavor/targets to build ?
Hi,
I think lld needs to have an infrastructure as part of the build process
to build specific flavors and specific targets.
For this I was thinking that the Registry expand to consider flavors and
targets that are part of the build process.
So each flavor/target would register and the Driver would walk through
the list of handlers to check if there is a handler defined for that
2014 Oct 07
5
[LLVMdev] [lld] lld build needs to have flags that specify what flavor/targets to build ?
On 10/7/2014 4:10 PM, Nick Kledzik wrote:
> Shankar,
>
> Can you give provide a scenario where you want this? I’m not sure what you want here.
a) LLVM could be built just for one target(LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD)
b) With LTO this case might happen more often, where an user would have
compiled LLVM just for one architecture and lld would support other
architectures that LLVM would not
2003 May 22
2
~ files not excluded from build (PR#3071)
My docs say files ending in ~ are excluded by default from R CMD build.
Doesn't look that way to me. I got them with 1.6.2 and 1.7.0.
My documenation is 1.6.0 (that is, the one saying *~ is excluded).
I have no .Rbuildignore of my own.
1999 Jun 02
0
Compiling SAMBA on DEC UNIX 4.0 W/OUT ENH SEC?
Hello!
I am wondering if anyone has compiled Samba on DEC UNIX 4.0 withOUT the
OSF1_ENH_SEC stuff? I don't want to use enhanced security, but I can't
seem to get away from it. I didn't see any configure options, so I have
been editing the source files to remove constants like OSF1_ENH_SEC and
HAVE_GETPRPWNAM (among others).
Has anyone had any luck with trying to do this? Thanks!
2008 Oct 30
1
Enh-Req: Mark As Read When Delivered
I'm under the impression bug-reports are supposed to go to the list,
so hopefully it's okay if I put in a feature request here too
(assuming it's not already implemented; but it doesn't look like it).
Basically, all I would like to do is be able to sometimes deliver mail
as already mail into mail boxes. Is there some way to do this?
If not, could a flag perhaps be added to
2007 Nov 02
1
[Patch, enh] Permit host and IP addresses in (Allow|Deny)Groups
Hi,
I ran across a case in which my server maintenance was simplified by
using
SSHD configuration options like this in sshd_config:
AllowGroups admin at 192.168.0.* sshuser
in much the same fashion as (Allow|Deny)Users. In this case, the goal is
to
provide access to administrators only from the local network, while
allowing
SSH users to login from anywhere. This (IMHO) simplifies access
2019 Sep 24
0
[centos/centos.org] 04/07: I didn't like the old-school 'flavors' word in the end, makes it simpler
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
unknown user pushed a commit to branch master
in repository centos/centos.org.
commit d9017a3b69c2986a88d76a5eb72d78034d895f67
Author: quaid <quaid at iquaid.org>
AuthorDate: Tue Sep 24 02:12:37 2019 -0400
I didn't like the old-school 'flavors' word in the end, makes it simpler
---
content/index.erb | 2 +-
2008 Apr 25
0
[Fwd: Re: Preference of Linux flavors]
Basically, on this subject, I'm with you. Which Linux you use is like
religion, what works for YOU is best. If you don't like Fedora, there
is Slackware (yes it is still there but under a different name?), Ubuntu
and many other Linux distributions. What DOES matter here is how you
use Wine and if Wine works for you.
James McKenzie
A user of Darwine on MacOSX 10.4.12 (soon to be
2009 Aug 07
0
Bug in nlm, found using sem; failure in several flavors (PR#13882)
Adam,
It seems that your attachment didn't make it through.
That aside, my experience with strange errors like those (random type
not implemented ones) has been that you may be looking at a memory
problem on you machine. Given that you can't replicate on another
platform (and the .csv file didn't come through), I would think it
wise to start there.
My 2c. And I love bacon too :)
2009 Aug 07
1
Bug in nlm, found using sem; failure in several flavors (PR#13881)
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.
--1660387551-1458482416-1249639718=:2997
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII; FORMAT=flowed
Content-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0908071039211.2997 at parser.ilovebacon.org>
Hello,
There appears to be a bug in the nlm function, which I
2009 Aug 07
1
Bug in nlm, found using sem; failure in several flavors (PR#13883)
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.
--1660387551-150661043-1249684349=:2997
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Hi Jeff,
=09As mentioned in my message, I *did* replicate on another platform.=20
One platform was
2009 Dec 17
5
?setGeneric garbled (PR#14153)
Full_Name: Ross Boylan
Version: 2.10.0
OS: Windows XP
Submission from: (NULL) (198.144.201.14)
Some of the help for setGeneric seems to have been garbled. In the section
"Basic Use", 5th paragraph (where the example counts as a single line 3rd
paragraph) it says
<quote>
Note that calling 'setGeneric()' in this form is not strictly
necessary before calling
2008 May 19
1
(PR#11484) On WinXP, R CMD config needs sh (and breaks without it)
2008/5/19 Prof Brian Ripley <ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk>:
> Where is the bug here? It also does on a Unix-alike.
Then "R CMD config --help" could at least spit out an error stating
what should be installed
(rather than die with an execution error straight from the DOS).
Setting an "sh" in the %Path% (sh coming from cygwin) does not seem to
lead to something working
1998 Jun 05
0
Re: "Flavors of Securit
> If you encrypt something twice with different keys,you can decrypt it with
> both keys - but mathematically, there is another
> key of a similar length that can decrypt that message equally well.
The probability that the result is strong is increased (consider the
case where 1/1000 keys is weak).
Also, if you do a bit more work, you can come up with something like 3des.
[mod: Now