similar to: unique turns ordered into factor (PR#2591)

Dear All A new non-linear mixed-effects modelling package for R called nlmeODE is now available at www.cran.r-project.org and http://nlmeODE.sourceforge.net. It combines Pinheiro and Bates' NLME library in R with an ordinary differential equations (ODE) solver thereby enabling the use of differential equations in population PK/PD modelling. It includes several PK examples such as one- and

I investigated why I was getting this error message... Error in Ops.factor(groups[subscripts], vals[1]) : Level sets of factors are different which led me to putting a browser in panel.superpose: Called from: panel.superpose(x, y, subscripts, ...) Browse[1]> vals vals [1] 1 2 3 Levels: 1 2 3 Browse[1]> groups[subscripts] groups[subscripts] [1] 1 2 3 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 Levels: 1 2

Dear Colleagues, Our group is also working on implementing the use of R for pharmacokinetic compartmental analysis. Perhaps I have missed something, but > fit <- nls(noisy ~ lsoda(xstart, time, one.compartment.model, c(K1=0.5, k2=0.5)), + data=C1.lsoda, + start=list(K1=0.3, k2=0.7), + trace=T + ) Error in eval(as.name(varName), data) : Object

Full_Name: Volker Franz Version: 1.5.1 OS: Debian-Linux Submission from: (NULL) (134.176.77.64) Hi, working with the panel.superpose function, I found out that this function does not pass the subscripts and groups arguments to panel.groups functions. In my view, this seems an unnecessary restriction, because the subscripts-mechanism which allows to access the original data should also work if

The advantages: 1. A pointer to the struct offset can be converted to a pointer without any cost. 2. A nullpointer to a stretchy buffer can be treated as a zero length array. Consequently no actual struct allocation is needed to represent a zero length array. 3. A reference to the array is the same size as to a pointer. 4. It can be converted to and back from an pointer without losing any

Yes, we’re actually viewing the struct at an offset. So basically it’s a struct like this: typedef struct { uint32_t size; uint32_t capacity; int array[0]; } Foo; The whole thing is malloc:ed with extra bytes at the end, and capacity is set to that same number of extra bytes. What’s then passed around is actually the int pointer at an offset: &(foo->array) Using the that pointer

> On 16 Jun 2017, at 15:59 , Robert McGehee <rmcgehee at walleyetrading.net> wrote: > > For instance, what would you expect to get from unlist() if each element of the list had different levels, or were both ordered, but in a different way, or if some elements of the list were factors and others were ordered factors? >> unlist(list(ordered(c("a","b")),

The s390-specific virtio drivers have probably more to do with virtio than with kvm today; let's move them out into a separate section to reflect this and to be able to add relevant mailing lists. CC: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck at de.ibm.com> --- MAINTAINERS | 10 +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1

The s390-specific virtio drivers have probably more to do with virtio than with kvm today; let's move them out into a separate section to reflect this and to be able to add relevant mailing lists. CC: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck at de.ibm.com> --- MAINTAINERS | 10 +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1

Dear Dressers of RedCloth, I have a question: text = "Foo\nBar\n\nBaz" RedCloth.new(text, [ :hard_breaks ]).to_html # => "<p>Foo<br />Bar<br />\nBaz</p>" Shouldn''t that really be "<p>Foo<br />Bar</p><p>Baz</p>"? So long, -- Christoffer Sawicki

On Wed, 1 Jul 2015 17:17:41 +0200 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 01/07/2015 17:15, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > The s390-specific virtio drivers have probably more to do with virtio > > than with kvm today; let's move them out into a separate section to > > reflect this and to be able to add relevant mailing lists. > > > >

On Wed, 1 Jul 2015 17:17:41 +0200 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 01/07/2015 17:15, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > The s390-specific virtio drivers have probably more to do with virtio > > than with kvm today; let's move them out into a separate section to > > reflect this and to be able to add relevant mailing lists. > > > >

I was looking at the talk from 2015 about opaque pointers. Aside from using the new methods (e.g. LLVMBuildGEP2), is there any other way to perpare for this change? And also - is it possible to use something like opaque pointers (that is using a single pointer type) even before the switch has been flipped in LLVM? Christoffer AEGIK / www.aegik.se

Hi: Yesterday, I posted a question regarding how to handle different graphical behavior between two factors in xyplot() [package lattice]. After a public and private reply from Deepayan Sarkar, the problem has been resolved nicely, including the addition of a stacked legend for the two factors in question. The latter requires package latticeExtra. library(lattice) library(latticeExtra) # Test

Dear list, I used to have this code in a Sweave document: sel <- placeDF$Place == "Velar" & placeDF$manner == "Plosive" table(placeDF$agem[sel], placeDF$place[sel]) -> pd print( dotplot( prop.table(pd,margin=1), auto.key=list( space="right" ), xlab="Relative Frequency",

Dear all, ? I don't know if you consider this a bug or feature, but it breaks reasonable code: 'unlist' and 'sapply' convert 'ordered' to 'factor' even if all levels are equal. Here is a simple example: o <- ordered(letters) o[[1]] lapply(o, min)[[1]]??????????# ordered factor unlist(lapply(o, min))[[1]]? # no longer ordered sapply(o, min)[[1]]??????????# no

Hi all - I'm trying to generate lattice barchart graphs with missing values, and came across the following: This does not run. I would expect it to: library(lattice) D = data.frame(X=1, Y=factor(letters[2], letters[1:2])) barchart(~ X, D, groups=Y) Error in grid.Call.graphics("L_rect", x$x, x$y, x$width, x$height, resolveHJust(x$just, : invalid line type which is simply

Defending the status quo misses the point that R *could* handle ordinal data with a fixed set of levels but actually *does not*. Although it would be useful. Even if this does not imply to handle any possible straw-man situations. Having data-types for nominal, ordinal, and interval-scale data is - in theory - one of the major advantages of S over SAS. But *having* without *handling* means: only

Hello I have a problem with isolinux my root filesystem is a iso9660 cdrom , it wont start the init but it mounts /dev/hdc as root. Cant linux start directly from a the cdrom or is this another problem? I get this: VFS: Mounted root filesystem (iso9660) readonly Freeing unused kernel memory: 2808kb freead Warning: unable to open an intital console Kernel panic: no init found. try parsing