similar to: Unix Symbolic links failing ("ls -s realfile linkedas") (PR#2381)

Can I use a command like this to clone an NT ACL? getfattr -n security.NTACL templateFile | sed -e 's/templateFile/realFile/' | sudo setfattr --restore=- I can see that the attribute gets copied over but when I view the ACL in Windows security tab it's not the same ACL, it's much bigger and includes all kinds of default-like stuff. I'm trying to find a way to update

On 03/24/2018 08:20 PM, Ken McDonald via samba wrote: > Can I use a command like this to clone an NT ACL? > > getfattr -n security.NTACL templateFile | sed -e > 's/templateFile/realFile/' | sudo setfattr --restore=- > > I can see that the attribute gets copied over but when I view the ACL > in Windows security tab it's not the same ACL, it's much bigger and

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2381 Bug ID: 2381 Summary: foreground mode for ssh-agent Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.9p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh-agent Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2020:2381 Important Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:2381 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: f74ffc53ad50103bb632597f34f8ad2d978d4833674d4bf50d49fd9d2c6f4f1c firefox-68.9.0-1.el7.centos.i686.rpm

As part of memory barrier cleanup, this patchset extends checkpatch to make it easier to stop incorrect memory barrier usage. This applies on top of my series arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt and will be included in the next version of the series. Changes from v2: catch optional\s* before () in barriers rewrite using qr{} instead of map Michael S. Tsirkin (3): checkpatch.pl: add

As part of memory barrier cleanup, this patchset extends checkpatch to make it easier to stop incorrect memory barrier usage. This applies on top of my series arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt and will be included in the next version of the series. Changes from v2: catch optional\s* before () in barriers rewrite using qr{} instead of map Michael S. Tsirkin (3): checkpatch.pl: add

Introduction of __smp barriers cleans up a bunch of duplicate code, but it gives people an additional handle onto a "new" set of barriers - just because they're prefixed with __* unfortunately doesn't stop anyone from using it (as happened with other arch stuff before.) Add a checkpatch test so it will trigger a warning. Reported-by: Russell King <linux at

Dear List: Is any one aware of a package that would extend the D() function and allow for one to maximize a likelihood function symbolically? Something akin to Solve[x==0, parameter] function in Mathematica? Clearly R has the capacity to _compute_ MLEs given a set of data. But, I'm looking for a package that would allow for me to define the likelihood function, find the 1st order partial

As part of memory barrier cleanup, this patchset extends checkpatch to make it easier to stop incorrect memory barrier usage. This replaces the checkpatch patches in my series arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt and will be included in the next version of the series. changes from v2: address comments by Joe Perches: use (?: ... ) to avoid unnecessary capture groups rename smp_barriers

As part of memory barrier cleanup, this patchset extends checkpatch to make it easier to stop incorrect memory barrier usage. This replaces the checkpatch patches in my series arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt and will be included in the next version of the series. changes from v2: address comments by Joe Perches: use (?: ... ) to avoid unnecessary capture groups rename smp_barriers

As part of memory barrier cleanup, this patchset extends checkpatch to make it easier to stop incorrect memory barrier usage. This applies on top of my series arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt and will be included in the next version of the series. Michael S. Tsirkin (3): checkpatch.pl: add missing memory barriers checkpatch: check for __smp outside barrier.h checkpatch: add virt

As part of memory barrier cleanup, this patchset extends checkpatch to make it easier to stop incorrect memory barrier usage. This applies on top of my series arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt and will be included in the next version of the series. Michael S. Tsirkin (3): checkpatch.pl: add missing memory barriers checkpatch: check for __smp outside barrier.h checkpatch: add virt

I am seeing a problem with the way the rsync of symbolic links is done. Here is a simple example to duplicate this issue: prompt> # Create a test case to show rsync of symbolic link problem prompt> mkdir foo bar prompt> touch foo/file1 bar/file2 prompt> ln -s bar/file2 file prompt> rsync -av . ../duplicate building file list ... done created directory ../duplicate ./ bar/

My machine got hacked a few days ago through the samba bug. I reinstalled everything cvsuped src-all, and ran chkrootkit. No more LKM but still... Can anyone please advise ? bash-2.05b# chkrootkit | grep INFECTED Checking `chfn'... INFECTED Checking `chsh'... INFECTED Checking `date'... INFECTED Checking `ls'... INFECTED Checking `ps'... INFECTED -- Jay -------------- next

When I do "ip ru ls" very often is nothing output, but sometime it output correct info root@prima:~# ip ru ls root@prima:~# ip ru ls root@prima:~# ip ru ls root@prima:~# ip ru ls root@prima:~# ip ru ls root@prima:~# ip ru ls root@prima:~# ip ru ls root@prima:~# ip ru ls 0: from all lookup local 1000: from 81.4.240.10 lookup TTK 1100: from 217.106.18.62 lookup TCNN 2000: from

Hello, we are using Samba Client to connect to cifs shares of a Network Appliance file server. In 80 % of the cases i do a ls, I always get an user@server:/dir/on/filer> ls ls: reading directory .: Cannot allocate memory error. Using ls on local filesystem or on Win2k smb shares works without a problem. I have a attached a trace to this message. (See attached file: strace.txt) We use Samba

R-2.14.2, Win7 x64 Dear list, I have the habit of including rm(list=ls()) at the top of most of my scripts. However, I wonder whether rm(list=ls()) gives the exact same result as closing R and starting again fresh. In other words, is it possible that there will be differences on how a script runs under a fresh start of R versus when I "only" use rm(list=ls()) , or should both

Hi ls the if top package availblale in Centos? http://www.ex-parrot.com/~pdw/iftop/ Thank you

Hi group When I use [TAB] to finish the file name ls shows the file. When I repeat the comman with [UP] ls says there's no such file. Any ideas ? The same thing on Fedora Core 3 and FreeBSD 5.3,4.9 [root@vax ~]# cat /etc/sysconfig/i18n LANG="ru_RU.UTF-8" SUPPORTED="en_US.UTF-8:en_US:en:ru_RU.UTF-8:ru_RU:ru" SYSFONT="latarcyrheb-sun16" [root@vax ~]# mount -t

Signed-off-by: Matthew Daley <mattjd@gmail.com> --- tools/xenstore/xenstore_client.c | 15 +++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/xenstore/xenstore_client.c b/tools/xenstore/xenstore_client.c index 3ac214b..996ee64 100644 --- a/tools/xenstore/xenstore_client.c +++ b/tools/xenstore/xenstore_client.c @@ -134,8 +134,13 @@ static void do_ls(struct