similar to: split.screen problem (PR#2069)

It appears that when plotting in split screens, R does not remember the range of the axes in the plots. For example, split the screen and create a plot in screen(1), say 'plot(1:10,1:10)'. Then switch from screen(1) to screen(2) and create another plot. Now switching back to screen(1) and attempting to add points with the 'points' command causes the points to plot incorrectly.

is there a good way to generate reports in R? I found the following code using split.screen but this only works with plots and i would like to generate reports with tables and charts. thx if (interactive()) { par(bg = "white") # default is likely to be transparent split.screen(c(2,1)) # split display into two screens split.screen(c(1,3), screen = 2) # now split the

Hi. As far as I understand it, there is a list of graphic primitives stored for a device. So for example, when I iconify/deiconify an X11 window, the plot will be redrawn. Now screen (split.screen and friends) appear not to handle this list properly, the list is reset or not reset at odd times. The commands below will show clearly what I mean. There are two effects: - After splitting the

Hi, I successfully created 3 screens with the following: fig.mat<-c(0,.5,.5,.5,1,1,0,0,.5,1,.5,1) fig.mat<-matrix(fig.mat,nrow=3) fig.mat split.screen(fig.mat) I can plot three different plots on those 3 screens, but when I try the following: (Trying to create three graphs with a common x-axis but different y-axis on screen 1) screen(1) par(oma=c(3,3,0,0)) par(fig=c(0,1,0,0.33))

I have dual-screen compiz-fusion finally working on my ATI Radeon Mobility X600. AIGLX was the way to go using MergedFB. gentoo linux-2.6.22 x11-base/xorg-server-1.2.0-r3 x11-base/xorg-x11-7.2 media-libs/mesa-6.5.2-r1 x11-wm/compiz-9999 x11-wm/compiz-fusion-9999 But a number of remaining issues: - my second screen doesn't render properly. Compiz events cause it to redraw but

Dear R-helpers! Using logarithmic axes sometimes results in an odd labelling. In some cases, only half of the axes do have labels. Hmmmm. I've played around with par(lab=c(5,5,7)) but that didn't help. An example: ---- begin example ---- x <- c(0.12, 0.3, 0.53, 1.1, 1.8, 2.6, 4.5) y <- c(0.012, 0.021, 0.032, 0.055, 0.1, 0.2, 0.35) plot(x, y, log="xy",

This means that the margins for 10 screens would take up more room than you have - essentially the plot area is being squeezed to nothing. You can try reducing your margins using par. Also, it looks like you're trying to split into 20 screens there. Hope this helps, Matt -----Original Message----- From: r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch [mailto:r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch] On

Hello. I am having trouble understanding the use of split.screen. I want to divide the device surface first into 4 equal screens: split.screen(figs=c(2,2)) This works. I next want to subdivide each of these 4 screens into 10 subscreens. I do, for the first of these 4 screens: screen(1,new=T) and then: split.screen(figs=c(10,2)) My understanding is that this should split screen 1 (i.e.

Hi. Let's try to explain the subject line with some code: > split.screen (c(2,1)) [1] 1 2 > screen(1) > plot (1:2, 1:2, log="y", main="1") > screen (2) > plot (1:2, 1:2, main="2") > screen (1) Error in par(.split.screens[[n]]) : invalid value specified for graphics parameter "yaxp". > close.screen(all=TRUE) Let's add comments:

I am working on the r panel package. Now if i have a function that uses a radiogroup button, and if i attempt to run the function from inside the rpanel menu, i get this error: Error in panel$intname : $ operator is invalid for atomic vectors However if i run the function per se i.e. not from inside the rpanel menu, but by calling it independently, the above error doesn't appear. Here is a

From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Adds support for the new TIC layout that's present on Maxwell GPUs, heavily based on the code for the existing layout. This code is required for GM20x support. While GM10x supports the older layout still, this commit switches it to use the updated version instead. Piglit testing shows zero regressions on GM107. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs

On 02/16/2016 03:47 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > Can you push this to a repo somewhere? I want to see what the final > version looks like after all your changes, but it's hard to see that > with these patches. https://github.com/skeggsb/Mesa/commits/master > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 12:38 AM, Ben Skeggs <skeggsb at gmail.com> wrote: >> From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at

Can you push this to a repo somewhere? I want to see what the final version looks like after all your changes, but it's hard to see that with these patches. On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 12:38 AM, Ben Skeggs <skeggsb at gmail.com> wrote: > From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> > > Adds support for the new TIC layout that's present on Maxwell GPUs, > heavily based on

I want to draw a figure with several panels of unequal size, so i thought I would try using screen(). However, I can't figure out how to define the sizes as a matrix. I've tried this: split.screen(matrix(c(0,0.5,0,0.5, 0.5,1,0.5,1), byrow=F, ncol=4)) and a couple of variants on it, but get the same error: Error in par(.split.screens[[cur.screen]]) : invalid value specified

Full_Name: Steve Koehler Version: 1.8.1 OS: Solaris and Windows Submission from: (NULL) (192.55.214.50) In the following program, if output is sent to X11, you get all four graphs, but if output is sent to .jpeg, you only get the C and D graphs. A workaround is to do all the screen splitting at the top, before using any screens. This also fails with .png output. jpeg ("test.jpeg")

Hi, I read at least 100 different documentations during the last week and didn't get it. So I decided to ask the list for help :) Unfortunately we have to move to a Windows 2008 Server ADS in our company as this is required for some other projects. But we want to keep our nice 5+ samba-server providing fast 50TB+ of storage. So we have to find a way to nicely integrate the storage with the

Dear all, I would be pleased if anyone could help me. The Rhelp description for the figs parameter is "a two-element vector describing the number of rows and colunns in a screen matrix". So, why does my code (below) produce a 2x1 screen matrix instead of a 1x2 one? Thanks in advance, rodrigo. ----------------------------------------------------------- plot.new()

- unreference state objects so that buffer objects are unreferenced and eventually destroyed - free channel at screen's destruction Index: nv50/nv50_screen.c =================================================================== --- nv50/nv50_screen.c (wersja 32083) +++ nv50/nv50_screen.c (kopia robocza) @@ -162,7 +162,22 @@ nv50_screen_destroy(struct pipe_screen *pscreen) { struct

Dear R Helpers, I am getting an error message from the try function that I don't understand so I am hoping that someone can help. I am scraping from web pages, but sometimes they disappear. When that happens I need to control for it with some sort of function. This web page is parsed without a problem. exh<-"NASDAQ" tic<-"EGHT"

Add proper flushes for TIC and TSC and remove the costly 2D.0110 flush in nv50_flush. Correct TIC and TSC bo sizes. --- src/gallium/drivers/nv50/nv50_context.c | 7 --- src/gallium/drivers/nv50/nv50_context.h | 5 ++ src/gallium/drivers/nv50/nv50_screen.c | 25 ++--------- src/gallium/drivers/nv50/nv50_state_validate.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++---