similar to: 1.5.1 docs on handling errors when embedding R ?

I look every now and then at RPy. It is not yet a Debian package as it had the odd problem here or there -- initially an Atlas interaction, currently something with long_jump() which cannot be found when R's dynamic library is loaded. [1] It is called R_eval.c: /* Abort the current R computation and signal a KeyboardInterrupt exception */ void interrupt_R(int signum) { interrupted = 1;

Hi List, We currently have a very irritating problem with Centos 5.3 x86_64 running on a Dell Poweredge SC1435. The problem is this: We are experiencing frequent kernel panics while using glusterfs and Fuse. Across the cluster of servers, we are experiencing roughly 1 panic every 1-2 days. This wasn't a problem with earlier servers where we used Fedora 6. Here's a kernel panic

I am trying to install Rpy to test it out as an R interface for a project that I am working on. However, I get the following error. Any clues as to what might be going on? I have alo tried RSPython, but I gave up due to errors. RSPython segfaults when started from R and gives an error message I can;t remember from python. Thanks, Brett >>> import rpy Traceback (most recent call

Hello, I have an intermittent authentication error between a Windows 2003 Server and AIX 6.1 TL4 Samba 2.2.7. I have the Samba server passing auth details to an active directory server. The account exists on AIX but is locked and there is no smbpasswd entry (this is how I setup all my samba shares). On the Windows server a mapping has been created to mount this path on restart. In most cases

> On 9 Nov 2020, at 09:59, Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > > On Mon, 2020-11-09 at 09:44 +1030, O'Connor, Daniel via samba wrote: >>> On 9 Nov 2020, at 09:24, O'Connor, Daniel <darius at dons.net.au> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 8 Nov 2020, at 22:49, Rowland penny via samba < >>>> samba at

On Mon, 2020-11-09 at 09:44 +1030, O'Connor, Daniel via samba wrote: > > On 9 Nov 2020, at 09:24, O'Connor, Daniel <darius at dons.net.au> > > wrote: > > > > > On 8 Nov 2020, at 22:49, Rowland penny via samba < > > > samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > > On 08/11/2020 11:52, O'Connor, Daniel wrote: > >

Dear all, Does anyone have any idea on how to speed up the for() loop below. Currently it takes approximately 2 minutes and 30 seconds. Because of the size of Nsim and N, simulating a multivariate normal (instead of simulating Nsim times a vector of N normal distributions) would require too much memory space. Many thanks for your kind help, Simona N=3000 PD=runif(N,0,1) cutoff.=qnorm(PD)

ly or Hybrid frames for 40 or 60ms packet, respectively. That is based on = concatenating 20ms frames, right? Is 60ms the largest packet opus_encode() can generate? In order to get pac= kets of up to 120 ms by combining multiple frames as described in RFC6716 c= lause 2.1.4 one would need to use the "repacketizer". That is if I want to= have a 120 ms packet, I would need to take

> On 4 Nov 2020, at 00:17, Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 03/11/2020 13:05, O'Connor, Daniel wrote: >> >>> On 3 Nov 2020, at 23:21, Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>> On 03/11/2020 12:17, O'Connor, Daniel wrote: >>>> I tried setting uidNumber et al via the active

> On 9 Nov 2020, at 09:24, O'Connor, Daniel <darius at dons.net.au> wrote: > >> On 8 Nov 2020, at 22:49, Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> >> On 08/11/2020 11:52, O'Connor, Daniel wrote: >>>> I know little about Freebsd jails, but if I understand them correctly, they are very similar to using a chroot on Linux and

> On 8 Nov 2020, at 22:49, Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 08/11/2020 11:52, O'Connor, Daniel wrote: >>> I know little about Freebsd jails, but if I understand them correctly, they are very similar to using a chroot on Linux and I wouldn't want to try and run a second DC in a chroot. >> Jails are pretty similar to chroot but

> On 3 Nov 2020, at 19:24, Stefan Kania via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Am 03.11.20 um 05:38 schrieb O'Connor, Daniel via samba: >> Hi, >> I have a Samba 4.11.8 system running as an AD and a file server and I am wondering what sort of ID mapping is done in this situation. >> >> I have uidNumber on each user set to use UIDs in the 1000 range

On 03/11/2020 13:05, O'Connor, Daniel wrote: > >> On 3 Nov 2020, at 23:21, Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> On 03/11/2020 12:17, O'Connor, Daniel wrote: >>> I tried setting uidNumber et al via the active directory editor and samba-ldbedit, however the mapping doesn't seem to change so I am wondering if it ends up stored

On 26 May 2014, at 23:26, Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote: > On May 26, 2014, at 4:05 AM, "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor at gsoft.com.au> wrote: > >> I've looked in upsc, upsrw and upscmd but none seem to have a suitable option. > > Is there a "battery.test" command, or similar? There are these commands.. test.battery.start.deep

On 10/26/2013 01:11 PM, Wang, Chris wrote: > A simpler question. How does opus_encode() generate packets of 20ms > (SILK-only or Hybrid)? Concatenating two 10ms frames or doing it > straight with just one 20ms frame? Just one 20 ms frame. It always returns a single frame except when it just can't (e.g. 60 ms CELT). > From your explanations below, opus_encode() will concatenate

>On 11/20/2013 03:37 PM, O'Connor, Kevin wrote: >> I have an application I intend to use Opus for that involves creating > recordings of two-party conversations where each party is saved as a >> separate channel. Audio may be later processed or analyzed on a >> per-party basis so if audio in one channel affects the other channel, >> it could create problems.

FYI, the README file section on building for Windows says to see the README.md files in the cmake or meson subdirectories, but there are no README files in either of those subdirectories. -----Original Message----- From: opus <opus-bounces at xiph.org> On Behalf Of Jean-Marc Valin Sent: Monday, March 4, 2024 12:52 PM To: opus at xiph.org Subject: Re: [opus] Opus 1.5 is out -- now with ML

Hi all, After all these years, I am finally porting some R-2.3.1-based S4 object code to R-2.6.1, dealing with all the S4 object system changes that came in R-2.4.0. I've run across what appears to be some sort of ommission in the implementation of callNextMethod() when used with primitives having group generic methods. In a stock R-2.6.1 patched (happens to be running on AMD64/RHEL 4, but

On 28 May 2014, at 10:54, Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote: > On May 26, 2014, at 8:21 PM, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > >> However if I do either of the tests upscmd just reports 'OK' and nothing happens. > > Anything in syslog? Not that I can see :( What would log it? I could try running the driver with debugging and see if that shows anything of

Thanks Jean-Marc and Benjamin for the answers. One follow-up question. If I use a repacketizer as Jean-Marc suggested by combining two 60ms frames to form a 120ms frame, without extracting individual frames and using a new TOC, I would need to have a "de-packetizer" that does the exact opposite of repacketizer. De-packetizer would need to separate this 120ms frame into two 60ms frames