similar to: Bug in pexp (PR#1590)

Dear R-community, not to re-invent the wheel I wonder if someone of you has ever written a function to compute the GHK smooth recursive simulator to estimate multivariate normal probabilities. See for instance page 194 of @BOOK{Greene97, author = {William H. Greene}, year = 1997, title = {Econometric Analysis}, edition = {3rd}, publisher = {Prentice-Hall}, address = {New Jersey

n_10;p_0.5;jjx_0:n;qbinom(pbinom(jjx,n,p),n,p) # This one works as expected n_100;p_0.5;jjx_0:n;qbinom(pbinom(jjx,n,p),n,p) # This one causes severe problems I cannot interrupt using ESC and I finally have to resort to the Windows Task manager to kill the R session. A friend of mine told me that he faced similar problems under Unix. --please do not edit the information below-- Version:

Dear "Debuggers", please have look a the following: > plot(0:1,0:1,type="n") > points(c(0,0.5,1),c(0,0.5,1)) > dev.print(device = postscript, width=5 , height=5, file="test1.ps") windows 2 ># This worked > dev.print(device = pdf, width=5 , height=5, file="test1.pdf") windows 2 ># That also >

Hello What is the appropriate method to test if a given distribution is a weibull thank you meriema email meriema.belaidouni at int-evry.fr

Is this a bug? >"xx" <- c(50, 79, 120, 78, 90, 100, 78, 80, + 90, 80, 60, 39, 90, 85, 140, 100, 80, 80) > boxplot.stats(xx)$stats [1] 60 78 80 90 100 > boxplot.stats(0.1*xx)$stats [1] 7.8 7.8 8.0 9.0 10.0 I suppose the way the numbers in 0.1*xx are internally stored may cause this problem: > formatC(0.1*xx[2],format="f",digits=16) [1]

Hello all, I wonder if there is a package including a program to display a 3dim histogram. Thanks. --- D.Trenkler --- **************************************************************************** ***** Dr. Dietrich Trenkler (dtrenkler at nts6.oec.uni-osnabrueck.de) Statistik / Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung Universitaet Osnabrueck Rolandstrasse 8

I suspect that there is bug in sub when using "?": > string_"This is a bug!" > sub("!", ", or isn't it?", string) [1] "This is a bug, or isn't it?" > string_"This is a bug?" > sub("?", ", or isn't it?", string) [1] "This is a bug?" Regards, *** D.Trenkler ***

# Your mailer is set to "none" (default on Windows), # hence we cannot send the bug report directly from R. # Please copy the bug report (after finishing it) to # your favorite email program and send it to # # r-bugs@biostat.ku.dk # ###################################################### "b" <- c(-5.5, -4, -2.3, -1.5, -1, -0.5, -0.41, -0.33, -0.29, -0.26, -0.2,

# Your mailer is set to "none" (default on Windows), # hence we cannot send the bug report directly from R. # Please copy the bug report (after finishing it) to # your favorite email program and send it to # # r-bugs@biostat.ku.dk # ###################################################### In version 0.99.0 for Windows NT I get the following: > .Random.seed [1] 0 21012

Dear R-Team, sorry for bugging (:-)), it's me again. In the FAQ coming along with the R distribution it reads: If R executes an illegal instruction, or dies with an operating system error message that indicates a problem in the program (as opposed to something like "disk full"), then it is certainly a bug. This encourages me to describe a crash I encountered a few minutes ago. I

# Your mailer is set to "none" (default on Windows), # hence we cannot send the bug report directly from R. # Please copy the bug report (after finishing it) to # your favorite email program and send it to # # r-bugs@biostat.ku.dk # ###################################################### Under R version 0.6.51 the following A_c(13,9,15,5,25,15,3,9,6,12) B_c(42,24,41,19,27)

Hi, I'm trying to label the horizontal axis of a plot with a symbol that is the equivalent of \mathbb{R} in LaTeX. I've had a look through the help pages for plotmath and for Hershey and haven't found the symbol. Could someone give me a pointer, please? Using R 1.9.1 on Win32. -- SC

I found the following strange behavior using qnorm() and pnorm(): > x<-8.21;x-qnorm(pnorm(x)) [1] 0.0004638484 > x<-8.22;x-qnorm(pnorm(x)) [1] 0.01046385 > x<-8.23;x-qnorm(pnorm(x)) [1] 0.02046385 > x<-8.24;x-qnorm(pnorm(x)) [1] 0.03046385 > x<-8.25;x-qnorm(pnorm(x)) [1] 0.04046385 > x<-8.26;x-qnorm(pnorm(x)) [1] 0.05046385 > x<-8.27;x-qnorm(pnorm(x))

Niels Waller wrote: > Does anyone know of an R (or S-PLUS) function for delineating all possible > combinations and permutations? The following function delivers all permutations of 1:n. all.perm <- function(n) { p <- matrix(1, ncol = 1) for (i in 2:n) { p <- pp <- cbind(p, i) v <- c(1:i, 1:(i - 1)) for (j in 2:i) { v <- v[-1]

The following is a data frame > "jjd" <- structure(list(Observations = c(6.8, 6.6, 5.3, 6.1, 7.5, 7.4, 7.2, 6.5, 7.8, 9.1, 8.8, 9.1), LevelA = structure(c(1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3), .Label = c("A1", "A2", "A3"), class = "factor"), LevelB = structure(c(1, 1, 2, 2, 1, 1, 2, 2, 1, 1, 2, 2), .Label =

Ein eingebundener Text mit undefiniertem Zeichensatz wurde abgetrennt. Name: nicht verf?gbar URL: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20060529/2d606d35/attachment.pl

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Prof Brian D Ripley > Gesendet am: Tuesday, March 07, 2000 11:30 AM > An: dtrenkler@nts6.oec.uni-osnabrueck.de > Cc: r-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch; R-bugs@biostat.ku.dk > Betreff: Re: [Rd] R-crash using cut-and-paste (PR#472) > > On Tue, 7 Mar 2000 dtrenkler@nts6.oec.uni-osnabrueck.de wrote: > > > Dear R-Team, > >

It took me by surprise to find that choose(4,5) delivers [1] NaN Warning message: NaNs produced in: choose(n, k) If we look at choose(4,5) as the number of ways of choosing 5 objects from 4 I would have expected 0 as result. Furthermore dhyper(5,4,6,5) does deliver 0 and this essentially equivalent to choose(4,5)*choose(6,0)/choose(10,5).

I have a vague recollection of seeing a R-function that will output a table or matix in a format suitable for the tabular enviroment in LaTeX. But I cannot find it. Any hints? Bendix ---------------------- Bendix Carstensen Senior Statistician Steno Diabetes Centre Niels Steensens Vej 2 DK-2820 Gentofte Denmark tel: +45 44 43 87 38 mob: +45 28 25 87 38 fax: +45 44 43 73 13 bxc at novo.dk

Dear all, Sorry for bringing up an old issue: >pexp(50, 0.5) [1] 1 In some cases, pexp() gives CDF=1. I read some discussion in 2002 saying it has been patched. However it's not working in "R2.4.1Patched". Could anyone help me out? Thanks a lot, Jeann _________________________________________________________________ Fine Dining & Fancy Food. Check Out This