similar to: make check fails d-p-q-r-tests.R - OpenBSD 3.0 (PR#1461)

strptime() mysteriously adds a day to a date, unless the year is specified. Tested on: Linux (RedHat 6.0) - R version 1.4.1 and R-devel. Windows - R version 1.4.1 Bug isn't found on OpenBSD, R version 1.4.1. Transcript: R : Copyright 2002, The R Development Core Team Version 1.4.1 (2002-01-30) ... > ## BUG: > ## strptime seems to add a day to the request, unless the year > ##

Hi, My data.frame "A" has FID like this FID a a b b b c c d d d d Now my second data.frame "B" has age value for a, b, c, d like FID Age a      5 b      7 c      9 d      3 How can search for the Age column in "B" and replace the values in "A" so that my new "A" looks like this FID Age a      5 a      5 b      7 b      7 b      7

On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 08:16:34PM CDT, Damien Miller wrote: >Hi, > >OpenSSH 7.8p1 is almost ready for release, so we would appreciate testing >on as many platforms and systems as possible. This is a bugfix release. AIX 7.1 TL5, C compiler 11.1.0.23 - error in "test_utf8": test_sshbuf:

Dear list member, I struggle with the problem, why the probabilities of choosing one of three mutually exclusive alternatives don?t sum up to 1! Let?s assume we have three alternatives X, Y, and Z. Let?s further assume we know their respective utilities: uX, uY, uZ. I?m interested in calculating the probability of choosing X, Y, and Z. Since I assume that the alternatives are mutually

Hmm, it is not actually at odds with help(c), it is just that the autocoercion works different that it used to, so that as.complex(NA) == as.complex(NA_real) == NA_real_+0i) which now differs from NA_complex although both print as NA. I haven't been quite alert when this change was discussed, but it does look a bit unfortunate that usage patterns like c(NA, 0+1i) does not give complex NA

Howdy! Has anybody successfully installed R under OpenBSD? I just tried to install the latest R-release under OpenBSD 2.7 and got the following errors in the make step: pnorm.c:62 'ML_ERR_return_NAN' undeclared pnorm.c:62 'ML_NAN' undeclared pnorm.c:62 'ML_NEGINF' undeclared --Ragnar -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help

Howdy! Has anybody successfully installed R under OpenBSD? I just tried to install the latest R-release under OpenBSD 2.7 and got the following errors in the make step: pnorm.c:62 'ML_ERR_return_NAN' undeclared pnorm.c:62 'ML_NAN' undeclared pnorm.c:62 'ML_NEGINF' undeclared --Ragnar -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help

Hi, R-2.1.1 OS: OpenBSD-current (3.8) on i386 Compiler:gcc version 3.3.5 (propolice) Thread model: single configure \ --with-readline \ --with-tcltk \ --with-tcl-config=/usr/local/lib/tcl8.4/tclConfig.sh \ --with-tk-config=/usr/local/lib/tk8.4/tkConfig.sh \ --with-libpng \ --with-jpeglib \ --with-zlib \ --with-bzlib \ --with-pcre \ --with-libiconv-prefix=/usr/local/

Hi all, I compiled 64-bit R on an Apple Mac G5 running OS X, but it failed make check. Simon Urbanek suggested I post results to R-devel. > On Nov 6, 2007, at 10:23 PM, Steven McKinney wrote: > > > Hi Simon, > > > > Would you be able to give more guidance on how to compile 64-bit > > libiconv for Tiger, > > You can get the sources from Apple and compile

In today's pre1.5.0 > ISOdate(2002,1,1) [1] "2002-03-01 04:00:00 PST" > ISOdate(2002,1,1)==ISOdate(2002,3,1) [1] TRUE It doesn't seem to happen for days other than 1/1 -thomas > version _ platform i686-pc-linux-gnu arch i686 os linux-gnu system i686, linux-gnu status Under development (unstable) major 1 minor 5.0 year 2002 month

Following from the R-help thread of March 22 on "Memory usage in prcomp", I've started looking into adding an optional 'rank.' argument to prcomp allowing to more efficiently get only a few PCs instead of the full p PCs, say when p = 1000 and you know you only want 5 PCs. (https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2016-March/437228.html As it was mentioned, we already

If anyone has a very fast vectorized method for doing the following I would appreciate some help. I want to avoid outer() to limit memory problems for very large n. Let x = real vector of length n y = real vector of length n w = real vector of length m, m typically less than n/2 but can be > n z = real vector of length m For w[i], i=1,,,m, find the value of x that is closest to w[i]. In

I agree with Kasper, this is a 'big' issue. Does your method of taking only n PCs reduce the load on memory? The new addition to the summary looks like a good idea, but Proportion of Variance as you describe it may be confusing to new users. Am I correct in saying Proportion of variance describes the amount of variance with respect to the number of components the user chooses to show? So

Under FreeBSD 5.3, attempting to properly install R-2.1.1, I get the following response when I..... % make ;all finishes without error, then... % make check <ret> . . ---------------------------------------------- comparing d-p-q-r-tests.Rout to d-p-q-r-tests.Rout.save 1004c1004 < [1] mean relative difference 1.2848649e-08 [1] TRUE .....Error code 1 stop in ~R/R-2.1.1/tests

On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 05:08:25PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Tue 2015-05-26 15:39:49 -0400, Mark D. Baushke wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > > > The generator value of 5 does not lead to a q-ordered subgroup which > > is needed to pass tests in > > > > http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-56A/SP800-56A_Revision1_Mar08-2007.pdf > > I

(1) ...need to speed up a monte-carlo sampling...any suggestions about how I can get R to use all 8 cores of a mac pro would be most useful and very appreciated... (2) spent the last few hours trying to get pnmath to compile under os- x 10.5.4... using gcc version 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5553) as downloaded from CRAN, xcode 3.0... ...xcode 3.1 installed over top of above after

> On 25 Mar 2016, at 10:41 am, peter dalgaard <pdalgd at gmail.com> wrote: > > As I see it, the display showing the first p << n PCs adding up to 100% of the variance is plainly wrong. > > I suspect it comes about via a mental short-circuit: If we try to control p using a tolerance, then that amounts to saying that the remaining PCs are effectively zero-variance, but

I used the command below, but R gives me the error message--syntax error. can anyone see the mistakes I made? optimize(function(x,y) + ((327.727-(1-0.114^10)*y*(1-x)/x/(1-x^y))+(9517.336-327.727 *(1+(1-x)*(1+y)/x-327.727)))^2 + interval=c(0,1)) At the same time, I use nlm() but R gives me the code $code [1] 3 function(vals) { x <- vals[1] y <- vals[2]

We are currently using cvs for both source and ports. I have begun changing to portsnap for ports, and I would also like to try changing at least some of our servers to freebsd-update. But all servers have been patched, using either RELENG_8_3 or RELENG_9_0 as cvs tag. I need to revert them to their respective RELEASE to be able to use freebsd-update. Complete reinstall from eg CD is not an

Are you referring to the zeroinfl() function in the countreg package? If so, I think predict(fm_zinb2, type = "zero", newdata = some.new.data) will give you pi for each combination of covariate values that you provide in some.new.data where pi is the probability to observe a zero from the point mass component. As to your second question, I'm not sure that's possible, for any