similar to: na.action=na.omit doesn't omit in glm() (PR#1282)

I am writing several webpages using the brew package and R2HTML. I would like to work off one script so I am using nested brew calls. The documentation for brew states that: "NOTE: brew calls can be nested and rely on placing a function named ?.brew.cat? in the environment in which it is passed. Each time brew is called, a check for the existence of this function is made. If it exists,

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1282 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME CC|

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1282 Summary: Log which key used for authentication Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: low-hanging-fruit Severity: security Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: bitbucket at

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1282 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1282.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 174543d428dc9dd4fac4e680a931392e nspr-4.8.8-1.el5_7.i386.rpm 109dce5e0128ce86c0cdff430287a82e nspr-devel-4.8.8-1.el5_7.i386.rpm Source:

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1282 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1282.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 174543d428dc9dd4fac4e680a931392e nspr-4.8.8-1.el5_7.i386.rpm 6170bc767464329189b22b87717fc35c nspr-4.8.8-1.el5_7.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2011:1282 nss and nspr security update for CentOS 4 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1282.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/nspr-4.8.8-1.el4.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/nspr-devel-4.8.8-1.el4.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/nss-3.12.10-4.el4.i386.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2011:1282 nss and nspr security update for CentOS 4 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1282.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/nspr-4.8.8-1.el4.i386.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/nspr-4.8.8-1.el4.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/nspr-devel-4.8.8-1.el4.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:1282 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1282.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: f9adad489bc9bc5fe4b82a400059ef87d5c7663d08e4607779d075772d42b1df rtkit-0.5-2.el6_4.i686.rpm x86_64:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1282 Bug ID: 1282 Summary: SIGSEGV on loading tables Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Ubuntu Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org Reporter:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7668 Summary: Add --omit-symlink-times option, same purpose as --omit- dir-times Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: All OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at

Dear r-devel list, dear Ben I came across a post of Ben Bolker from Feb 2012 (see below) on handling NA values in prcomp(). As I faced the same issue and found Ben's suggestions interesting, I was wondering whether this led to further discussions I might have missed? I understand handling NA values is far from trivial, but would it be possible to add a warning in the documentation, and/or

Dear all, I have a series of variables that looks roughly like the sample data below and I'm trying to conduct a factor analysis. I've omitted cases with missing values for the factor analysis, but now I'd like to use the scores on each component as new variables in the *original* data set for analysis. That is, I'd like to take the scores on each of the two factors and see how

Hi all > a<-c(2,Inf) > max(a) [1] Inf > How can I say...omit Inf? I cannot find anything... [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I''m using ActionWebService to expose a WebService of my application, and I would like to control the error responses sent back to the client. At very least, I would like to prevent the XML to include the backtrace. How can I do this?

-- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top -------------- next part -------------- >From 298c7e2db9b1be751928844553339fa0317a54c3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Jones

Hey guys, Is there a way to force the LLVM JIT compiler to omit the frame pointer in its generated i386/amd64 code? I've got a complex situation in which the stack can potentially be moved around so I'd prefer that the base pointer doesn't get pushed there. Félix

Hi, It looks like the default for -fomit-frame-pointer has recently changed from "no" to "yes at O1 and higher", but I did not see the commit. Was that intentional? (AddressSanitizer uses frame pointers to unwind stack, that's how we noticed). Thanks, --kcc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: > Hi, > > It looks like the default for -fomit-frame-pointer has recently changed from > "no" to "yes at O1 and higher", but I did not see the commit. > Was that intentional? Yes; r146586. -Eli

On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 12:10:54PM -0800, Kostya Serebryany wrote: > What would be the best fix for asan? Can you be explicit what you need to asan? Just the equivalent of __builtin_return_address(0) or do you really need a full stack trace? Joerg

> What would be the best fix for asan? > Force -mdisable-fp-elim when asan is enabled or document that asan > requires -fomit-frame-pointer for better warning messages? Just messages? I would suggest documentation. If it is needed by some of the checks then enabling frame pointers by default when asan is enabled and rejecting or warning when someone tries to use both asan and