similar to: (PR#1242) copy metafile from window() device fails when

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "(PR#1242) copy metafile from window() device fails when"

2002 Jan 04
0
copy metafile from window() device fails when lattice/grid is (PR#1242)
Dear all, I'm running into a rather strange problem that hasn't happened before R-1.4.0. If I make a plot on a window() device, and use the menu to either save to a metafile or copy to clipboard as a metafile, I get an error message in the R console: Error: A metafile can store only one figure. This only happens when the lattice (and grid) package is attached, regardless of whether the
2004 Apr 26
1
Lost graph contents using Copy as metafile
Dear colleagues: I use R 1.9.0 on Windows XP. One of my common tasks is to get R graphs into Word documents. A open windows() device, almost always trellis.device() for me, provides great convenience with the right-click shortcut menu item "Copy as metafile". I typically have the History > Recording feature turned on as well. Since upgrading to 1.9.0, I have experienced an
2002 Jun 06
0
Thanks and Summary (was par(new=T) with xyplot)
Thanks very much to Paul Murrell and Frank Harrell for addressing my original query (repeated at end of this note). Paul's helpful suggestion with print.trellis and its more= argument, followed by trellis settings, works precisely as I needed. > # snipped from Paul's reply: > p1 <- xyplot(y ~ x, ylim=c(-5, 5)) > p2 <- xyplot(y2 ~ x, pch=16, ylim=c(-5, 5), ylab="
2002 Feb 22
1
c-c problem when R compiled with pthread
Dear R-devel, I've run into this problem that when I hit c-c to interrupt a command or computation, the R session just ends. The info: R-1.4.1 compiled from source on Linux Mandrake 7.1. Dual P-3 Xeon with 2GB ram. 1. Compiled R with link to Intel Math Kernel Library (for fast BLAS), which needed pthread. C-c at the R prompt ends the R session. 2. Compiled R with link to (threaded)
2002 Jan 11
1
linking R against MKL
Dear R-help, Has anyone tried linking R against the Intel Math Kernel Library on (obviously) Intel architecture? Since MKL claimed to provide optimized BLAS and Lapack, I thought it might be possible to compile R against it w/o too much trouble. My first naive try under Linux (Mandrake 7.1), using R-patched dated Jan. 4, 2002: ./configure --with-blas=/usr/local/intel/mkl/LIB/libmkli32_p3.a
2002 Jun 05
2
par(new=T) with xyplot
I know I should not mix base plotting functions with grid/lattice functions, but I have used a "quick-and-dirty" trick of par(new=T) in the past for annotating a trellis-drawn graph in various versions of S-PLUS. The sequence goes something like this: > windows(width = 5, height = 5, pointsize = 10) # open up the device > xyplot(y ~ x) > par(new=T) > xyplot(y2 ~ x) >
2002 Jun 18
1
can't find array overruns (was: help debugging segfaults)
Dear R-devel, Last week I got several responses to my question about debugging segfaults in my code (original post below). After I changed the S_alloc() calls to Calloc()/Free(), the symptom was gone, but I was told to keep looking. So I did: o Switched to Calloc/Free. Electric Fence did not find any problem. o Put assert(index < bound); assert(index >=0); everywhere in the C routine
2001 Dec 11
2
Rcmd SHLIB problem
Dear R-help, I'm having problem creating a dll using Rcmd SHLIB with R-1.3.1 on WinNT4: C:\TEMP>Rcmd SHLIB tryf.o make[1]: `libR.a' is up to date. make: *** No rule to make target `'tryf.o', needed by `tryf.a'. Stop. C:\TEMP>Rcmd SHLIB tryf.f make[1]: `libR.a' is up to date. make: *** No rule to make target `'tryf.o', needed by `tryf.a'. Stop. I
2001 Dec 11
2
Rcmd SHLIB problem
Dear R-help, I'm having problem creating a dll using Rcmd SHLIB with R-1.3.1 on WinNT4: C:\TEMP>Rcmd SHLIB tryf.o make[1]: `libR.a' is up to date. make: *** No rule to make target `'tryf.o', needed by `tryf.a'. Stop. C:\TEMP>Rcmd SHLIB tryf.f make[1]: `libR.a' is up to date. make: *** No rule to make target `'tryf.o', needed by `tryf.a'. Stop. I
2001 Dec 20
2
Any interest in ATLAS-enabled R-1.4.0 for MSWin?
Hi all, I've compiled R-1.4.0 on my NT box with link against ATLAS. It has passed all the Rcmd CHECK that I could run. If there's sufficient interest, I can make the SetupR.exe available (on CRAN?). Just drop me a note if you're interested. Note the following: o I can only connect thru 56K dial-up until Jan. 2, 2002, so unless there's overwhelming demand, I won't attempt
2002 Jun 12
3
help debugging segfaults
(Sorry for the cross-post--- I wasn't sure which list is more appropriate...) Hi everyone, I've run into segfaults when using my randomForest package on large dataset (e.g., 100 x 15200) and large number of trees (e.g., ntree=7000 and mtry=3000). I'm wondering if anyone can give me some hints on where to look for the problem. The randomForest package mainly consists of two things:
2002 Jun 12
3
help debugging segfaults
(Sorry for the cross-post--- I wasn't sure which list is more appropriate...) Hi everyone, I've run into segfaults when using my randomForest package on large dataset (e.g., 100 x 15200) and large number of trees (e.g., ntree=7000 and mtry=3000). I'm wondering if anyone can give me some hints on where to look for the problem. The randomForest package mainly consists of two things:
2002 Apr 02
2
random forests for R
Hi all, There is now a package available on CRAN that provides an R interface to Leo Breiman's random forest classifier. Basically, random forest does the following: 1. Select ntree, the number of trees to grow, and mtry, a number no larger than number of variables. 2. For i = 1 to ntree: 3. Draw a bootstrap sample from the data. Call those not in the bootstrap sample the
2002 Apr 02
2
random forests for R
Hi all, There is now a package available on CRAN that provides an R interface to Leo Breiman's random forest classifier. Basically, random forest does the following: 1. Select ntree, the number of trees to grow, and mtry, a number no larger than number of variables. 2. For i = 1 to ntree: 3. Draw a bootstrap sample from the data. Call those not in the bootstrap sample the
2003 Oct 20
0
Re: win.metafiles in linux and R
Dear all: Professor Ripley commented: > Note that libEMF's help page says > > It is also possible now to generate EMF files from PSTOEDIT > on POSIX > systems. Therefore, if your graphics code only outputs > PostScript, you > can now easily convert it to EMF. > > but that is only true on Windows (unfortunately). > Actually I have had some luck
2002 Jun 13
3
[R] help debugging segfaults
Hi all, Thanks to Prof. Ripley, Prof. Gentleman, and Simon Wood (did I miss anyone?). The problem seemed to have gone away. Everyone suggested using some malloc debugger (such as Electric Fence). All I did was following half of what BDR suggested below, i.e., changing all the S_alloc() calls to Calloc() and Free(). I didn't get to try efence, and the problem seems to have disappeared! As
2005 Feb 08
1
Windows Printing and Line Widths
Hi all, I develop and print from both Windows and Linux, and am seeing some printing inconsistencies first described about a year and a half ago by Andy Liaw (see below). Specifically, the line widths on my windows plots are about 5 times smaller than that on Linux, and my windows printouts do not match what my screen looks like. However, if I print to a pdf file first, then I can get accurate
2005 Feb 08
0
RE: [R] Windows Printing and Line Widths
... Moved from R-help ... Thank you for your suggestion, Professor Ripley. Postscript does seem like the way to go for printing line widths correctly in Windows. On Linux I am using a simple dev.print() wrapper (as suggested), with a pipe to lpr. However, I had an extremely difficult time getting postscript printing under windows. ?postscript recommends the RedMon suite of tools for printing
2003 Jun 23
2
Lwd ignored when printing on Windows
Dear R-help, Has anyone notice the problem that, on Windows (NT and XP), when printing a graph using the "File -> Print..." menu in the graphics window to print the graph, that line width seemed to be ignored in the printed output? For example, if I make a plot with plot(1:10, type="l", lwd=5), it looks right on screen, but when printed out using the menu, it looks like
2004 Mar 25
1
yet another fast BLAS (from AMD this time)
Dear R-devel, Has anyone played with this? http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/DevelopWithAMD/0,,30_2252_2282,00.html <http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/DevelopWithAMD/0,,30_2252_2282,00.html> . I'll probably give it a shot... Best, Andy Andy Liaw, PhD Biometrics Research PO Box 2000, RY33-300 Merck Research Labs Rahway, NJ 07065 mailto:andy_liaw@merck.com