similar to: pac2bin

I need to compute generalized eigenvalues. The eigen function in base doesn't do it and I can't find a package that does. As I understand it, Lapack __can__ computer them (http://www.netlib.org/lapack/lawn41/node111.html) and R can use Lapack. If there is no function already, can I access Lapack from R and use those routines directly? Thank you, Joshua Gilbert.

>From "R Installation and Administration:" Note that the BLAS library will be used for several add-on packages as well as for R itself. This means that it is better to use a shared BLAS library, as most of a static library will be compiled into the R executable and each BLAS-using package. Is there an idiots guide on how to do this (or should idiots just not try).

Dear List Members, I'm presently carrying out morphological analysis of a data set of neuronal structures. These are essentially 3D binary trees. In due course I will be trying to use discriminant analysis or other methods to classify these neurons based on morphological variables such as total tree length, segment number etc. I would like to calculate a 3D convex hull for a set of X,Y,Z

Hi. I just noticed the paper by Morales and Nocedal Remark on "Algorithm 778: L-BFGS-B: Fortran Subroutines for Large-Scale Bound Constrained Optimization". TOMS 2011; 38(1): 7 http://www.ece.northwestern.edu/~morales/PSfiles/acm-remark.pdf which describes a couple of improvements (speed and accuracy) to the original Netlib code which AFAICT is that still used by optim() via f2c.

>>>>> "Martyn" == Martyn Plummer <plummer@iarc.fr> writes: Martyn> I will do this if you haven't been overrun with volunteers Martyn> already ;) No, you are the first to answer. Thank you very much in advance! --------------------- Martyn> Some time ago you asked about a basic time series Martyn> library for R. Did anything come

I was hoping fatal: relocation error: symbol not found: pow_ii: referenced in .../dsefor.so would disappear in R 0.6x, but it has not. I believe this is suppose to come from the f2c lib, but I seem to need just a couple of routines: nm -u dsefor.so Undefined symbols from dsefor.so: .umul pow_dd pow_ii pow_ri For my own purposes I could compile with fortran but that makes it much

I have a problem with my dynamically loaded code in R not finding pow_ii, which for some time I thought was because library f2c is not on my Sparcstation. However, I have now been experiencing the same problem in Linux, with all the proper libraries in place. My incomplete understanding of elf and shared libraries does not help, but when compiling a complete program I usually muddle through.

Fellow R Enthusiasts.. I'm trying to compile R on AIX 5.2 32bit with gcc 3.3.2-5. I've tried both the development bundle R-devel_2006-01-25.tar.gz and the R-beta.tar.gz from about a month ago. In each instance, I'm using the following options prior to running "./configure --prefix=/usr/local/R": OBJECT_MODE=32 MAIN_LDFLAGS=-Wl,-brtl SHLIB_LDFLAGS=-Wl,-G

Fellow R Enthusiasts.. I'm trying to compile R on AIX 5.2 32bit with gcc 3.3.2-5. I've tried both the development bundle R-devel_2006-01-25.tar.gz and the R-beta.tar.gz from about a month ago. In each instance, I'm using the following options prior to running "./configure --prefix=/usr/local/R": OBJECT_MODE=32 MAIN_LDFLAGS=-Wl,-brtl SHLIB_LDFLAGS=-Wl,-G

>R INSTALL dse rlibs >Installing package `dse' ... >libs >gcc -g -fpic -I/usr/local/R-0.61/include -c dsefor.c -o dsefor.o >/tmp/cca02533.i:1: numeric constant with no digits >/tmp/cca02533.i:1: numeric constant with no digits >... >is there something wrong with my gcc or is there some >option missing somewhere? >I suspect the problem might have to do with

>R INSTALL dse rlibs >Installing package `dse' ... >libs >gcc -g -fpic -I/usr/local/R-0.61/include -c dsefor.c -o dsefor.o >/tmp/cca02533.i:1: numeric constant with no digits >/tmp/cca02533.i:1: numeric constant with no digits >... >is there something wrong with my gcc or is there some >option missing somewhere? >I suspect the problem might have to do with

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Matthieu Brucher" <matthieu.brucher at gmail.com> > To: "Alex L" <arphaman at gmail.com> > Cc: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 12:55:44 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] GSoC project questions. > > > > > > > > >

2013/4/24 Alex L <arphaman at gmail.com> > You may want to check the later versions of the standard also to check if >> some of your proposal is not deprecated there. >> > I had a quick check with 2008 standard, and I'm pretty sure that all of > the stuff that I chose is there, although a lot of it has various additions > and changes. > The EQUIVALENCE

Jim, you should ask questions like these on R-devel. There are more proficient Linux gurus on there than me [that's why I CC:]. >>>>> "Jim" == Jim Lindsey <jlindsey@luc.ac.be> writes: Jim> Martin, Here is an additional problem with my libraries: the Jim> Kalman filtering, written in Fortran, uses complex arithmetic. Jim> On my Red Hat 5,

Dear LLVMers, Does anyone know what the latest is w.r.t a FORTRAN front-end for LLVM? Is anyone expecting to have typical f90/f95 programs compiling to LLVM this year, or next? (I'm aware of the "NAG hack" and various other f2c-type approaches, but they give me a strange feeling in my tummy.) Duraid

Hello, I have only negative experiences with cpp-netlib - I would not recommend it. If the discussion was around only the client part I think libcURL would be the best option since it's available everywhere and is a well maintained library. But as you mention it's only the client part. We use pion (https://github.com/splunk/pion) to build a HTTP server interface, but since it seems

In Windows, I tried to build and check Paul Gilbert's dse bundle with the command rcmd check ../library/dse It ran for a while and built the packages, then failed at the end with this: ** checking Rd files ... OK ** checking for undocumented objects ... OK ** creating syskern-Ex.R ... ERROR I get similar errors checking packages, but there make pkgcheck-foo works. I don't

Ben Bolker gives some reasons why Numerical Recipes may be problematic as a starting point for R codes. CUP did a masterful job of marketing, but the license is restrictive as the links he gives points out. In some tests, I've also noted that some of the algorithms are less than stellar e.g, convergence tests in one or two optimization routines. Should we have a wiki item to help people find

Hello, I have set up an anonymous rsync server that seems to work as expected. However when I try to access the server from several other unix boxes using rsync with a command like this; rsync netlib3.cs.utk.edu::netlib I get the motd and then a line that states client: nothing to do Now I would expect this to give me a directory listing. I do get the directory listing as expected when

Good day, Here I was trying to write a code for Garch(1,1) . As garch problem is more or less an optimization problem I also tried to get the algorithm for "nlminb" function. What I saw that if use this function 'nlminb" I can easyly get the estimate of parameters. But any other function is not working. I tried to write my own code for optimization using Quasi-Newton