similar to: RODBC

Under which version of R is it supposed to run ? With 1.1.0 under windows NT 4.0 against Access databases it doesn't work, I cannot get the name of the tables, every query I execute returns with "No Data". I'm surely doing something wrong ... Federico Spinazzi spinazzi@databankgroup.it Databank S.P.A Via Spartaco, 19, ITALY Tel. + 39 02 55002251 >Several of you have kindly

Sorry, I was commenting on the previous windows version (version file says 0.5a) (the first one which ran under RW.1.0.0) I have Win NT 4.0 Service pack 5 and R is > version _ platform Windows arch x86 os Win32 system x86, Win32 status major 1 minor 0.0 year 2000 month February day 29 language R > -----Original Message----- > From: Prof Brian

Version 1.2.6 of RODBC is now on CRAN. This has a number of bug fixes and many workarounds for ODBC driver quirks--I've set up further testbeds for SQL Server 2008, Oracle and DB2. More visibly, the documentation has been expanded in several ways, in particular in collecting together advice on using 'schemas' and 'catalogs' in the ?RODBC overview. There is also a test

Version 1.2.6 of RODBC is now on CRAN. This has a number of bug fixes and many workarounds for ODBC driver quirks--I've set up further testbeds for SQL Server 2008, Oracle and DB2. More visibly, the documentation has been expanded in several ways, in particular in collecting together advice on using 'schemas' and 'catalogs' in the ?RODBC overview. There is also a test

It seems to work smoothly now. Thank you very much. Federico Spinazzi spinazzi@databankgroup.it Databank S.P.A Via Spartaco, 19, ITALY Tel. + 39 02 55002251 -----Messaggio originale----- Da: Prof Brian Ripley <ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk> A: Federico Spinazzi <spinazzi@databankgroup.it> Cc: R-devel@r-project.org <R-devel@r-project.org> Data: lunedì 27 novembre 2000 11.03 Oggetto:

On behalf of Michael Lapsley, who is away. There is a new version of RODBC on CRAN, version 0.8-2. A version compiled for rw1011 will propagate to CRAN tonight. Main differences: - This will work with the up-coming R 1.2.0. - Nulls in databases are handled (more) correctly. The bug that has been reported with repeated entries was it transpires to do with null fields, not empty ones

On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Martin Maechler wrote: > >>>>> "BDR" == Prof Brian D Ripley <ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk> writes: > > BDR> On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Trenkler, Dietrich wrote: > >> I think I've discovered what went wrong. > >> > >> My workspace included a function wilcox.test formerly copied from > >>

[This turned into a bug report which will go to r-devel, so I have taken it off r-help.] Bugs reported here: (1) formatC's help page need some clarification. (2) formatC needs to treat modes "double" and "real" as equivalent. (3) format's help page or (preferably) format needs correction re the meaning of `digits' On Sun, 28 Feb 1999, Martin Maechler wrote:

>>>>> "BDR" == Prof Brian Ripley <ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk> >>>>> on Fri, 30 May 2008 22:34:28 +0100 (BST) writes: BDR> I think it is ESS that is parsing this as a help BDR> request (so it can divert it to an ESS buffer). BDR> Looks like this is an ESS issue, not an R one. yes, indeed, hence much more belonging the ESS-help

There is a new version of RODBC, 0.9-1, with a new maintainer (me) now on CRAN (Vienna) which works with R 1.6.x. The Windows binary will be there tomorrow, and both will then propagate around CRAN. This has been tested on Linux under unixODBC against MySQL and Postgresql (thanks to Dirk Edelbuettel), and on Windows against Access, MySQL and Excel. The CRAN compilation checks were against

There is a new version of RODBC, 0.9-1, with a new maintainer (me) now on CRAN (Vienna) which works with R 1.6.x. The Windows binary will be there tomorrow, and both will then propagate around CRAN. This has been tested on Linux under unixODBC against MySQL and Postgresql (thanks to Dirk Edelbuettel), and on Windows against Access, MySQL and Excel. The CRAN compilation checks were against

(1) I do read the posting guide (the fact that I missread o missunderstood something does not imply not reading) (2) I could change NAs to 0 (I know) but I have previously (older versions of R and SQL*Plus) used the same select with the "right" output (namely with 0s). (3) AFAIK "strange" is not a negative remark and does not seem to me at the very least but that is always a

> To: "Heberto Ghezzo" <heberto at MEAKINS.Lan.McGill.CA> > Subject: Re: [R] R-0.63.1 is released > From: Peter Dalgaard BSA <p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk> > > "Heberto Ghezzo" <heberto at MEAKINS.Lan.McGill.CA> writes: > > > Sorry for a silly question but. . . > > why the new version is 'bdr0631' ? what is the

> BDR> You will need to call it something else: dist is a clone of an S > BDR> function, and dist(X, "manhattan") is well-established usage. > > one could still imagine an extra Y argument such that > dist(X, Y=myY, method="euclidean") > and dist(X, "euclidean", Y=myY) > would work > one could even make it such that > both

Guido has fixed Rterm hanging on Windows 2000 in interactive and --ess modes. The problem was that 'PulseEvent' doesn't work under 2000 as documented (and I can find nothing about this in MicroSoft's Knowledge Base except that it is known to happen under a debugger). The cross-compiled pre-release at http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/bdr/RWin/Rpre now incoporates the fix, and we

Version: platform = sparc-sun-solaris2.6 arch = sparc os = solaris2.6 system = sparc, solaris2.6 status = status.rev = 0 major = 0 minor = 64.2 year = 1999 month = July day = 3 language = R -- It is unclear to me that the handling of NAs is desirable, and it has problems with names: > z <- c(T,T,NA,F,T) > names(z) <- letters[1:5] > which(z) Error: names attribute

I've recently done a lot of re-writing of the internals of RODBC, and have a test version 0.99-6 available. This is a run-up to the release of 1.0. Both the source code and a Windows binary (prepared under rw1062) are available at http:/www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/R, and I would appreciate some real users testing this version. It should be more efficient as data frames are transferred to and from

To: Windows Users ----------------- We would appreciate your comments on future possibilities for help on Windows systems. I have put up a pre-test version based on the current R-release snapshot at http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/bdr/RWin/rwtest999.zip (ca 4.5Mb) ftp://ftp.stats.ox.ac.uk/.... (999 means Sept 1999, BTW). This has (i) text help (ii) HTML help to be viewed in Netscape/IE*

I've put up a build of the current R-patched (and updated recommended packages) for Windows at http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/bdr/RWin/Rpre/SetupRpatched.exe This should be able to rename files on Win 9x (unlike the mid-May build) and can build packages accessing Rblas.dll. As ever, this is less tested than an official release, in particular only on Windows XP, but ought to have fewer

Charles Raux raised the problem of having object names with accented chars in. This is supposed to work, but depends on the machine being set to a locale that allows accented chars, and knowing correctly which they are. Windows being what it is, this is a problem. It seems that with the standard runtime crtdll.dll that rw1011 uses, Windows 9x does not know about locales, whereas NT does but