similar to: legend -- one more try

Perhaps I should have submitted this as a bug so that it would be officially tracked. It's not a big deal, but here it is again (I can't remember which version this patch is against, but I don't think legend() has changed since then ...) Basically, the problem is that if you want to have "opaque" points that overlay lines (rather than using type="b" and having

Full_Name: Jerome Asselin Version: 1.6.2 OS: RedHat Linux 7.2 Submission from: (NULL) (142.103.173.179) Should be an easy fix... Consider the examble below: plot(0,0) legend(0,0,c("Hello!","Hi!"),pch=1:2,lty=1:2,trace=T) It gives the following trace: > plot(0,0) > legend(0,0,c("Hello!","Hi!"),pch=1:2,lty=1:2,trace=T) xchar= 0.05178 ;

I have made a minor hack to "legend" (in R 1.0.0, but I didn't notice any changes to legend in the 1.0.1 NEWS) to allow the legend to be formatted in multiple columns, or horizontally (number of columns <- number of legend items). (I find this helpful when I have lots of legend items and not a lot of vertical space to squeeze the legend into.) (Another hack I've considered

[The part about S (S-plus and R being dialects of S) programming (at the end) makes me cc'ing this to R-devel. MM] On R-core, >>>>> "Paul" == Paul Murrell <paul@stat.auckland.ac.nz> writes: Paul> hi (i) the problem with the positioning of the legend in your Paul> barplot example: Paul>

Lfo@psykiatri.aaa.dk wrote: > (R1.9.1 Windows) > > In legend( ) lwd have no effect on points - contrary to the behaviour > in e.g. plot( ) and points( ). It would be nice to have an option pt.lwd > affecting the line width of legend points (like pt.cex changes the > magnification). > > > An example (note the difference in line width between points in the > plot

Hi, are there any plans to add a colorbar legend to image()? Or such a possibility already implemented which I just haven't discovered yet. Anyway, I will be willing to spent some time on the implementation if there isn't anyone working on that already. Thanks Thomas -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-devel mailing list -- Read

Here are another three problems with logarithmic scales: 1) segments() does not work with logarithmic scales. I suggest to change lines 962-973 in "plot.c": for (i = 0; i < n; i++) { if (FINITE(xt(x0[i%nx0])) && FINITE(yt(y0[i%ny0])) && FINITE(xt(x1[i%nx1])) && FINITE(yt(y1[i%ny1]))) { GP->col = INTEGER(col)[i % ncol];

"contour" can't return a list of contours (it would be nice) "arrows" has different options from S-PLUS (no "open" or "rel" options, no "lwd" parameter or graphics parameter pass-through; "size" in S corresponds to "length" in R). [I know we needn't follow S-PLUS syntax slavishly, but it would be nice at least to

Dear R developers, I needed to align the title of legend for some of my plots. If there is interest to include this into base R, bellow are the examples and the relevent diffs. Regards, Gregor x <- 1:10 y1 <- 1.5 * x y2 <- 2.0 * x y <- cbind(y1, y2) source(file=url("http://gregor.gorjanc.googlepages.com/legend.R")) matplot(x, y, type="l", lty=c(1, 2)) ##

On Sun, 27 Jul 2008, S Ellison wrote: > Looking at the legend() source the filled box line colour is hardcoded : > if (mfill) { > if (plot) { > fill <- rep(fill, length.out = n.leg) > rect2(left = xt, top = yt + ybox/2, dx = xbox, dy = ybox, > col = fill, density = density, angle = angle, > border =

When legend() is used with the angle argument as follows, not only the boxes beside the legend text, but also the whole legend box is filled with shading lines. I think this is not intended: plot(1:10) legend(8, 4, c("A", "B"), angle=c(10, 80), fill=NULL, density=20) I'd suggest as a fix (legend.R of R-1.5.0): 25c25 < rect2 <- function(left, top, dx, dy,

Hi, Drawing a legend I would like to be able to specify the color of boxes which are drawn if fill or density is specified. eg. legend(0,40000,c("raw","LR/PR-TPS"),fill=c(1,2),col=c(1,2),density=c(20,20),angle=c(-20,45),bty="n") Currently the color of the boxes -- border is always black and can *not* be changed. To get this option only a *minimal* change is

I could not find a way to specify the border color of the boxes drawn in a legend, so that the legend can match exactly the colors of the actual plot (e.g. in the case of two superimposed histograms which have different shading and different borders). Indeed, the legend function seems to hard code the color "black" for the borders in this call: rect2(left = xt, top = yt +

Full_Name: Arkady Sherman Version: 2.8.0 OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (158.195.16.114) Please consider initialization of the "seg.len" variable. It's done only if (do.lines) { seg.len <- 2 .., but after the seg.len is used: if (has.pch) { pch <- rep(pch, length.out = n.leg) pt.bg <- rep(pt.bg, length.out = n.leg) pt.cex <-

Hi all, I want to estimate parameters from a VARMA(p,q)-Modell. The equations of the model or the model structures is given by: Xt=beta1+beta2*Xt-1+beta3*Yt-1+epsilon1 Yt=beta4+beta5*Yt-1+espilon2 epsilon1 and espilon2 are white noise. Xt is given by a vector of n elements e.g. (2, 4, 7, 9, …,n)’ and Yt is given by a vector of n elements e.g. (4,9,12,17,…,n)’. The lineVar from

Hi all, Can I run a cointegrating regression, for example delta Xt=a1(Yt-1-cXt-1)+E1t and delta Yt=-b1(Yt-1-cXt-1)+E2t with R were Xt and Yt are non stationary time series at t a,b,c are parameters and E1t and E2t are error terms at t. Yt-Xt is stationary Any suggestions are welcome. Best regards, /fb -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing

I'm having trouble creating a looping variable and i can't see wher ethe problem arises from any hep gratfully appreciated First create a table x<-table(SURVEY$n_0,exposed) > x exposed False True Under 16 24 1 16-19 68 9 20-24 190 37 25-34 555 204 35-44 330 87 45-54 198 65 55-64 67 35 65+

Hello all, * * I'm having some difficulty, and I think the problem is with how I'm using append() nested inside a for loop. The data are: y,x 237537.61,873 5007.148438,227 17705.77306,400 12396.64369,427 228703.4021,1173 350181.9752,1538 59967.79376,630 140322.7774,710 42650.07251,630 5382.858702,264 34405.82429,637 92261.34614,980 144927.1713,1094 362998.7355,1420 203313.6442,1070

Le 31/05/2017 ? 17:30, Serguei Sokol a ?crit : > > More thorough reading revealed that I have overlooked this phrase in the > line's doc: "left and right /thirds/ of the data" (emphasis is mine). Oops. I have read the first ref returned by google and it happened to be tibco's doc, not the R's one. The layout is very similar hence my mistake. The latter does not

I have a question about pooling or "stacking" several time series ?samples? (sorry in advance for the long, possibly confusing, message). I'm sure I'm revealing far more ignorance than I'm aware of, but that's why I'm sending this... [Example at bottom] I have regional migration flows (?samples?) from, say, regions A to B, A to C, B to A, ?., C to B (Noted as