similar to: Bug(s) w/ rbind.data.frame(); fix also read.table(*, as.is = TRUE) ? (PR#669)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Bug(s) w/ rbind.data.frame(); fix also read.table(*, as.is = TRUE) ? (PR#669)"

2007 Aug 07
5
Extending RAIDZ.
Yeah:) I''d like to work on this. Here are my first observations: - We need to call vdev_op_asize method with additonal ''offset'' argument, - We need to move data to new disk starting from the very begining, so we can''t reuse scrub/resilver code which does tree-walk through the data. Below you can see how I imagine to extend RAIDZ. Here is the legend:
2013 May 21
0
[PATCH] 02-
- Use MAC16_16 macros instead of (sum += a*b) and unroll a loop by 2. It increase performance when using optimized macros (ex: ARMv5E). A possible side effect of loop unroll is that i don't check for odd length here. - Add NEON version of FIR filter and autocorr -- Aur?lien Zanelli Parrot SA 174, quai de Jemmapes 75010 Paris France -------------- next part -------------- diff --git
2013 May 21
2
[PATCH] 02-Add CELT filter optimizations
Please ignore my previous mail and patch, there is a new version :). Patch changes are: - Use MAC16_16 macros instead of (sum += a*b) and unroll a loop by 2. It increase performance when using optimized macros (ex: ARMv5E). A possible side effect of loop unroll is that i don't check for odd length here. - Add NEON version of FIR filter and autocorr - Add a section in autoconf in order to
2006 Mar 28
1
can rsync delete only one file in one command? is it a bug?
I want to call rsync from java webserver in Linux. situation as below: source directory: 001.doc 002.doc /D01/001.doc /D01/002.doc /D01/D11/001.doc /D02/001.doc destination directory: 001.doc 003.doc 004.doc /D01/001.doc /D01/003.doc /D01/004.doc /D01/D11/003.doc /D02/003.doc now, I want to only delete /003.doc when synchronization, no add, no update, This exclude works: rsync -avzu
2012 Aug 21
0
[LLVMdev] Passing return values on the stack & storing arbitrary sized integers
2012/8/21 Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info>: >> This isn't really my area of expertise, but I think you're messing up >> your RegisterClass definition. Look at how ARM defines DTriple. > DTriple is untyped :) , because we do not have any valut type which > defines 3xi64. > However, the paired register needs to have type. > > Fabian, what are
2015 Jul 30
0
[LLVMdev] [3.7.0] Two late issues with cross compilation to mips
Thanks. This is making a lot more sense now and it's looking like this issue isn't Mips specific. Here's the IR dump before simple register coalescing (note: I've patched the IR printer to print the contents of the regmask): 4480B %vreg260<def> = LDC1 %vreg253, <cp#3>[TF=6]; mem:LD8[ConstantPool] AFGR64:%vreg260 GPR32:%vreg253 4496B %vreg261<def> = FMUL_D32
2010 May 30
0
How to interpret a result based on wmtsa
Dear R family I have a question as to how to get an answer I want to derive with the outcome from R-package, "wmtsa". My concern is that I want to decide equivalent degrees of freedom (EDOF) based on the following outcome. library(wmtsa) W <- wavMODWT(X, wavelet="s8") z1 <- wavEDOF(W) print(z1) #Intentionally, I do not assign n.levels and specify SDF. The following is
2013 May 24
0
zpool resource fails with incorrect error
I''m working to expand / develop on the zpool built-in type, but the zpool command is failing and Puppet''s returned stderr is not what I get if I copy/paste the command given by the debug output. # cat /etc/puppet/manifests/zpool_raidz2.pp zpool { ''tank'': ensure => present, raidz => [ ''d01 d02 d03 d04'', ''d05 d06
2011 Jan 08
0
[LLVMdev] Unreachable executed with fast Regalloc and Sparc backend
On Jan 7, 2011, at 2:36 PM, Venkatraman Govindaraju wrote: > When I run LLC with option "-O0 -march=sparc" on following testcase, > fast register allocator crashes with "UNREACHABLE executed" error. LLC > generates code successfully with other standard register allocators > available. I haven't investigated the Sparc backend specifically but... My guess is
2012 Aug 21
2
[LLVMdev] Passing return values on the stack & storing arbitrary sized integers
Fabian, > here are the definitions of these register classes: > > // Data register class > def DR : RegisterClass<"TriCore", [i32], 32, > (add D0, D1, D2, D3, D4, D5, D6, D7, > D8, D9, D10, D11, D12, D13, D14, D15)>; > > // Extended-size data register class > def ER :
2009 Sep 23
1
re peated measures
Hi, I am performing a repeated measures 2-way ANOVA to assess the influence of plant and leaf on aphid fecundity. Fecundity is measured for each aphid on a single leaf. Here is what I typed. wingless <- reshape(Wingless, varying =
2010 Jul 05
2
nested for loops
Dear Admin, I will appreciate if you advise me an effective way to write the following R code including nested for loops. I cannot do it by using expand.grid function because it results with memory allocation problems. Thanks for your time and consideration. for(d1 in 0:n){ for(d2 in 0:n){ for(d3 in 0:n){ for(d4 in 0:n){ for(d5 in 0:n){ for(d6 in 0:n){ for(d7 in 0:n){ for(d8 in 0:n){ for(d9 in
2012 Aug 22
0
[LLVMdev] Passing return values on the stack & storing arbitrary sized integers
>> here are the definitions of these register classes: >> >> // Data register class >> def DR : RegisterClass<"TriCore", [i32], 32, >> (add D0, D1, D2, D3, D4, D5, D6, D7, >> D8, D9, D10, D11, D12, D13, D14, D15)>; >> >> // Extended-size data register class >> def ER :
2011 Jun 09
1
Error: missing values where TRUE/FALSE needed
I'm writing a function and keep getting the following error message. myfunc <- function(lst) { lst <- list(roots = c("car insurance", "auto insurance"), roots2 = c("insurance"), prefix = c("cheap", "budget"), prefix2 = c("low cost"), suffix = c("quote", "quotes"), suffix2 = c("rate",
2012 Aug 23
0
[LLVMdev] Passing return values on the stack & storing arbitrary sized integers
2012/8/22 Ivan Llopard <ivanllopard at gmail.com>: > Hi Fabian, Anton, > > > On 22/08/2012 08:25, Fabian Scheler wrote: >>>> >>>> here are the definitions of these register classes: >>>> >>>> // Data register class >>>> def DR : RegisterClass<"TriCore", [i32], 32, >>>>
2012 Aug 22
2
[LLVMdev] Passing return values on the stack & storing arbitrary sized integers
Hi Fabian, Anton, On 22/08/2012 08:25, Fabian Scheler wrote: >>> here are the definitions of these register classes: >>> >>> // Data register class >>> def DR : RegisterClass<"TriCore", [i32], 32, >>> (add D0, D1, D2, D3, D4, D5, D6, D7, >>> D8, D9, D10, D11, D12, D13, D14,
2013 Nov 19
5
xenwatch: page allocation failure: order:4, mode:0x10c0d0 xen_netback:xenvif_alloc: Could not allocate netdev for vif16.0
Hi Wei, I ran into the following problem when trying to boot another guest after less than a day of uptime. (the system started 15 guests at boot already which went fine). dom0 is allocated a fixed 1536M. Both host as pv guests run the same kernel, some hvm''s run a slightly older kernel (3.9 f.e.) The are quite some granttable messages in xl dmesg, i also included these and a
2012 Aug 23
0
[LLVMdev] Passing return values on the stack & storing arbitrary sized integers
On 23/08/2012 11:06, Fabian Scheler wrote: > 2012/8/22 Ivan Llopard<ivanllopard at gmail.com>: >> Hi Fabian, Anton, >> >> >> On 22/08/2012 08:25, Fabian Scheler wrote: >>>>> here are the definitions of these register classes: >>>>> >>>>> // Data register class >>>>> def DR :
2020 Mar 31
2
[ARM] Register pressure with -mthumb forces register reload before each call
Hi, Compiling attached test-case, which is reduced version of of uECC_shared_secret from tinycrypt library [1], with --target=arm-linux-gnueabi -march=armv6-m -Oz -S results in reloading of register holding function's address before every call to blx: ldr r3, .LCPI0_0 blx r3 mov r0, r6 mov r1, r5 mov r2, r4 ldr r3,
2006 Mar 21
3
Rsync 4TB datafiles...?
I need to rsync 4 TB datafiles to remote server and clone to a new oracle database..I have about 40 drives that contains this 4 TB data. I would like to do rsync from a directory level by using --files-from=FILE option. But the problem is what will happen if the network connection fails the whole rsync will fail right. rsync -a srchost:/ / --files-from=dbf-list and dbf-list would contain this: