Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "Re: [R] too large alpha or beta in dbeta ? (PR#643)"
2000 Aug 26
0
Re: [R] too large alpha or beta in dbeta ? (PR#643)
>>>>> "MM" == Martin Maechler <maechler@stat.math.ethz.ch> writes:
>>>>> "TL" == Thomas Lumley <thomas@biostat.washington.edu> writes:
TL> On Thu, 24 Aug 2000, Troels Ring wrote:
>>> Dear friends.
>>>
>>> Is this as expected ? Is alpha and beta too large simply ?
>>>
2000 Aug 28
0
Re: [R] too large alpha or beta in dbeta ? (PR#643)
>>>>> "MM" == Martin Maechler <maechler@stat.math.ethz.ch> writes:
>>>>> "TL" == Thomas Lumley <thomas@biostat.washington.edu> writes:
TL> On Thu, 24 Aug 2000, Troels Ring wrote:
>>> Dear friends.
>>>
>>> Is this as expected ? Is alpha and beta too large simply ?
>>>
2000 Aug 24
1
too large alpha or beta in dbeta ?
Dear friends.
Is this as expected ? Is alpha and beta too large simply ?
> dbeta(.1,534,646)
[1] NaN
Warning message:
NaNs produced in: dbeta(x, shape1, shape2, log)
Best wishes
Troels
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or
2013 Sep 18
1
dbeta may hang R session for very large values of the shape parameters
Dear all,
we received a bug report for betareg, that in some cases the optim call in betareg.fit would hang the R session and the command cannot be interrupted by Ctrl-C?
We narrowed down the problem to the dbeta function which is used for the log likelihood evaluation in betareg.fit.
Particularly, the following command hangs the R session to a 100% CPU usage in all systems we tried it (OS X
2011 Aug 01
3
Beta fit returns NaNs
Hi,
sorry for repeating the question but this is kind of important to me and i
don't know whom should i ask.
So as noted before when I do a parameter fit to the beta distr i get:
fitdist(vectNorm,"beta");
Fitting of the distribution ' beta ' by maximum likelihood
Parameters:
estimate Std. Error
shape1 2.148779 0.1458042
shape2 810.067515 61.8608126
Warning
2011 Jul 29
1
How to interpret Kolmogorov-Smirnov stats
Hi,
Interpretation problem ! so what i did is by using the:
>fit1 <- fitdist(vectNorm,"beta")
Warning messages:
1: In dbeta(x, shape1, shape2, log) : NaNs produced
2: In dbeta(x, shape1, shape2, log) : NaNs produced
3: In dbeta(x, shape1, shape2, log) : NaNs produced
4: In dbeta(x, shape1, shape2, log) : NaNs produced
5: In dbeta(x, shape1, shape2, log) : NaNs produced
6: In
1997 Apr 15
1
R-alpha: Bug & Patch in dbeta.c (0.50 - PreR 7)
dbeta(1, a,b) would return 1 instead of 0.
Here is the patch for ..../src/math/dbeta.c :
--- dbeta.c~ Sun Nov 24 23:43:10 1996
+++ dbeta.c Tue Apr 15 21:25:30 1997
@@ -23,9 +23,7 @@
{
if (a <= 0.0 || b <= 0.0)
DOMAIN_ERROR;
- if (x <= 0)
+ if (x <= 0 || x >= 1.0)
return 0.0;
- if (x >= 1.0)
- return 1.0;
return MATH_CHECK(pow(x, a - 1) * pow(1.0 - x, b - 1.0) /
2001 Jun 06
3
error in dbeta (PR#970)
Full_Name: Hans Peter Wolf
Version: 1.2.1
OS: hpux10.20
Submission from: (NULL) (129.70.84.25)
dbeta computes a wrong result with parameters (1.3,1)
> version
platform hppa2.0-hp-hpux10.20
arch hppa2.0
os hpux10.20
system hppa2.0, hpux10.20
status
major 1
minor 2.1
year
2007 May 03
1
Bayesian logistic regression with a beta prior (MCMClogit)
Dear all,
I am trying to use the logistic regression with MCMClogit (package:
MCMCpack/Coda) and I want to put a beta prior on the parameters, but it's
giving me error message (please see output below) no matter what shape 1 or
2 I use. It works perfect with the cauchy or normal priors. Do you know if
there is a catch there somewhere? Thanks
logpriorfun <- function(beta,shape1,shape2){
2007 Nov 08
1
64-bit R-build on Mac OS X 10.4 - make check failures
Hi all,
I compiled 64-bit R on an Apple Mac G5 running OS X, but it failed
make check. Simon Urbanek suggested I post results to R-devel.
> On Nov 6, 2007, at 10:23 PM, Steven McKinney wrote:
>
> > Hi Simon,
> >
> > Would you be able to give more guidance on how to compile 64-bit
> > libiconv for Tiger,
>
> You can get the sources from Apple and compile
2010 Jan 04
3
how to plot multiple density functions in one graph
Hello,
I am new to R and have two easy questions.
How can you plot multiple density functions in one graph? I have five beta
densities that I would like to plot in one graph. I understand how to plot
one beta density as a line:
plot (x,(dbeta(x,shape1=,shape2=,), type ="l")
Does the Pareto distribution need to be added to R with an additional
package?
thanks,
John
[[alternative
2013 Jan 22
2
Assistant
Good-day Sir,
I am R.Language users but am try to? estimate parameter of beta distribution particular dataset but give this error, which is not clear to me: (Initial value in "vmmin" is not finite)
beta.fit <- fitdistr(data,densfun=dbeta,shape1=value , shape2=value)
kindly assist.
expecting your reply:
2007 Oct 24
1
plot within a loop
Hi ,
I'm having problem with the following plot. Basically I have to do
51(length of d, see below) plots. I want 6 plots (say) in a page and
rests are in different pages. win.graph() starts a plot in new page. But
I'm not being able to combine par(mfrow = c(3,2)) and win.graph() within
a loop.
> d
[1] 14.108 13.883 11.022 13.426 2.341 9.010 12.868 15.603 30.810
3.931 11.825
2011 May 03
3
fitting distributions using fitdistr (MASS)
Please guide me through to resolve the error message that I get
this is what i have done.
>x1<- rnorm(100,2,1)
>x1fitbeta<-fitdistr(x1,"beta")
Error in fitdistr(x1, "beta") : 'start' must be a named list
Yes, I do understand that sometime for the distribution to converge to the
given set of data, it requires initial parameters of the distribution, to
2011 Dec 01
3
Change the limits of a plot "a posteriori"
Hi all
How can I change the limits (xlim or ylim) in a plot that has been already
created?
For example, consider this naive example
curve(dbeta(x,2,4))
curve(dbeta(x,8,13),add=T,col=2)
When adding the second curve, it goes off the original limits computed by R
for the first graph, which are roughly, c(0,2.1)
I know two obvious solutions for this, which are:
1) passing a sufficiently large
2017 Dec 21
0
Fitting Beta Distribution
I answer my own question: I had overlooked the fact that the normalization
factor is also a function of the parameters I want to optimise, hence I
should write
dbeta2 <- function(x, shape){
res <- x^(shape-1)*(1-x)^(shape-1)/beta(shape, shape)
return(res)
}
after which the results are consistent.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Lorenzo Isella <lorenzo.isella
2017 Dec 21
1
Fitting Beta Distribution
Dear All,
I need to fit a custom probability density (based on the symmetric beta
distribution B(shape, shape), where the two parameters shape1 and shape2
are identical) to my data.
The trouble is that I experience some problems also when dealing with the
plain vanilla symmetric beta distribution.
Please consider the code at the end of the email.
In the code, dbeta1 is the density of the beta
2008 Oct 19
1
multivariate integral with ADAPT when the parameter is close to boundary
Dear All,
There is one problem I encountered when I used ADAPT to compute some
2-D integral w.r.t beta density.
For example, when I try to run the following comments:
fun2<-function(theta){return(dbeta(theta[1],0.005,0.005)*dbeta(theta[2],0.005,0.005))}
int.fun2<-adapt(ndim=2,lo = c(0,0), up = c(1,1),functn = fun2,eps = 1e-4)
It seems it will take very long time to run. Acturally, I
2007 Nov 24
2
how to compute highest density interval?
Suppose i want to compute a 95% highest density for a beta distribution
beta(a,b)
the two end points x1 and x2 shoudl satisfy the following two equations:
pbeta(x1,a,b)-pbeta(x2,a,b)=95%
dbeta(x1,a,b)=dbeta(x2,a,b)
Is there any fast way to compute x1 and x2 in R?
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2008 Sep 30
2
R's integrate function
Hello,
I am trying to use R's integrate function to calculate the following
integral for z=423:
integrate(function(y,z){
sapply(y, function(y,z){
integrate(function(x,z)
1/x*dbeta(0.01,x/(0.005/1.005),(1-x)/(0.005/1.005))*dbeta(y,x/(0.005/1.005),(1-x)/(0.005/1.005))*(1-y)^z,0,1,423)$value
})
},0,1,423)$value
but I receive an error message saying that the maximum number of
subdivisions is