similar to: mod_gnutls on Centos 4

Hi, I have (re)built a few apache modules not included in distro nor rpmforge. http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb/stable/i386/repodata/repoview/M.group.html http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb/stable/i386/repodata/repoview/M.group.html http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb/stable/x86_64/repodata/repoview/M.group.html http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb/stable/x86_64/repodata/repoview/M.group.html There's

Hi, Those who are interested in anti Sloworis solution. I have built and packed mod_antiloris for C4/5. Packages are to be found at: http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb/stable/i386/repoview/mod_antiloris.html http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb/stable/x86_64/repoview/mod_antiloris.html http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb/stable/i386/repoview/mod_antiloris.html

Hi, RH devel kernels from http://people.redhat.com/dzickus/el5/ built against Centos tree are available here: http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-kernel/stable/x86_64/repodata/ http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-kernel/stable/i386/repodata/ Regards, David Hrb??

All, For anyone interested, there is an rpm in the CentOS testing repository for mod_gnutls for CentOS 5. It allows named based virtual hosting for HTTPS (Single IP, multiple sites and certificates). The idea to build the RPMS came from this article: http://www.g-loaded.eu/2007/08/10/ssl-enabled-name-based-apache-virtual-hosts-with-mod_gnutls/ Here is a guide for installing and using the new

Hi everybody, I want to build mod_gnutls. The problem: CentOS' version of GNUTLS is too old to link against, so I compiled and installed GNUTLS from source and put it into /opt where it doesn't hurt the already installed GNUTLS. Now I have trouble linking against this version as the autoconf buildchain in mod_gnutls does not find the newer version. I tried like this: ./configure

Hi, I have again worked on yum 3.2.8 for Centos 4 today, after a long time. The result is backported package yum-3.2.8-9.el4.hrb.2.1.5 which is the upgrade of yum-3.2.8-9.el4.hrb.2.1.3 I've been using smoothly for quite a long time. Packages are in testing repos: http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb/testing/i386/repodata/ http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb/testing/x86_64/repodata/ I'd like to

Hi, full ICH9 support for Centos 5 can be found http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/pub/ Take it as a workaround until CentOS 5.1 is released. I hope ICH9 to be included in this version. Support is done by backporting from new kernel versions. Delta file is created with mkdeltaiso from CentOS-5.0-i386-bin-DVD.iso, so full image can be created with applydeltaiso. Regards, David Hrb??

Hi, here are the unofficial C5 openssh5 rpms: http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-ssh/stable/i386/ http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-ssh/stable/x86_64/ Regards, David Hrb?? PS:Some of you may find C4 versions of these. Please do not use them, they are not OK yet.

Hi, Well, ICH9 support for CentOS as announced on Oct 16th by me http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2007-October/088104.html has been extended. Today I have published x86_64 install DVD. You can find it here: http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/pub/ich9/ Regards, David Hrb??

Is there a compiled mod_bandwidth rpm in CentOS or EPEL? I can't seem to find it, what name does it use if there is one? Basically all I need to do is find a way to severely throttle apache for testing an upload progress bar - my bandwidth on my lan is too fast, the progress bar either only gets one update or none by the time the files are uploaded (5 8 megapixel jpegs) - even when I use

Hi, those who are interested in l7-filter on C4.4, here is the testing repo. http://homen.vsb.cz/~hrb33/el4/hrb/testing/i386/RPMS/repodata/ Kernels and iptables RPMS are compiled with l7-filter. Feel free to test and send the reports. Packages are not signed, not even with special release version. Should be fixed on final release. New release should also include IMQ, ESFQ. Iproute is the only

I need to be able to install CentOS 5.2 on a machine with software RAID (and LVM) setup. I discovered (the hard way!) that there is a bug in the mkinitrd package that causes it to enter an endless loop when there are /dev/mapper/ devices present during the install process. There is a patch to mkinitrd, which I applied and created a new rpm for mkinitrd with this patch applied. I'd like to

Hi! I am currently publishing some web services on a Centos 5.3 server on my office using the included apache httpd. They are available from the Internet, and they require validation (username/password). I would like to publish them all under https, so the passwords won't travel unencrypted, but then all my sites use the same certificate on apache httpd. The solution to this is using an

I want to add mod_security to my Apache server running CentOS 5.3 and am trying to find a repository to get it from. I found it in EPEL, but they have version 2.1.7, which is over a year old according to what I found on the modsecurity.org website. Is there a repository which is keeping this up to date? Or should I just build it from source? -- Bowie

hello centos network I'm trying to set up mod_gnutls in order to be able to offer more certificates on the same host and same ip mod_gnutls the package is placed in centos testing Does it happen when the update depot because I am bored of using a package that is not present in the Official Depository I started to use this package with multiple encrypted url now I do everything through 443

Can this be done with stock centos 4? Or can this even be done with the extras repo? -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333 Baltimore,

I am looking to be a bit more standard in the builds of my CentOS rpms, and so I was about to install mock but noticed that there is one provided in the centos/5/extras and another in epel. epel is obviously newer, but are there reasons/experiences in this group that would suggest sticking with the extras version instead? Or even reasons other than the shiny version number on the epel one to

Hello, we have enabled yum-updatesd on our dozen real and virtual machines running CentOS 5.2 some time ago and are very satisfied: afarber at ablsw01:~> grep -v ^# /etc/yum/yum-updatesd.conf [main] run_interval = 7200 updaterefresh = 1200 emit_via = email dbus_listener = no do_update = yes do_download = yes do_download_deps = yes (it would be good to make it use the proxy though...) My

I want to install TinyCA2 on my Centos5 setup. I had a real learning experience the last time around (last year, July) and in the end, I got the repo down from Dag's site and was cool. Now I am on Centos 5 and no TinyCA2. Can I just download the EL4 rpm from: http://apt.sw.be/redhat/el4/en/i386/dag/repodata/repoview/tinyca2-0-0.7.5-2.el4.rf.html and do a yum localinstall ? Or do I have

This week I set up a local mirror for a few dists, including Centos 4.0 and 4.2, and Fedora Core 3 and 4. I'm using a script called yum-pull. For the most part I really like the script, it automates the setup of your mirrors and tries a bunch of different mirrors when it goes out to get updates, if it fails on one it tries another. It uses the usual suspects, createrepo and repoview, among