Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "Windows readme and last patch"
2004 Jan 05
3
Updated - wxRuby Windows installer available for
Curt,
I just downloaded and tried your installer and the installation went fine. There are problems with the samples not finding their images files, but only when I try to run the samples from their Start menu shortcuts. When I edit the properties of a shortcut, and change the "Start in" folder to match the folder where the sample resides, then the problems go away. (As-installed,
2004 Jan 04
4
wxRuby Windows installer available for testing
I have a first cut of a windows installer for wxRuby available for testing.
It can be downloaded with this URL:
http://curthibbs.us/wxruby-mswin-0.2_debug.zip
This installer currently assumes that you have installed Ruby from Andy
Hunt''s one-click Ruby Installer for Windows, *and* that you have installed
it in the default directory (C:\ruby). I still need to figure out how to
read
2003 Oct 22
11
Survey results
Many thanks to the 23 people who took the time to respond to the survey.
It really will help me spend my time more effectively. As promised, here
are the results. I have inserted some comments inside [brackets].
1. Have you downloaded wxRuby?
YES 19
NO 4
2. Have you successfully built wxRuby?
YES 14
NO 8
[We really need binary downloads so people don''t have to build anything.
2003 Dec 31
3
Whoo Hoo! I got a working Windows Build of wxRuby
I finally got a working native windows build of wxRuby (using a static build
of wxWindows so everything is in a single dll -- wxruby.so)!
Two things contributed to my success: 1) building wxWindows with the vc++
makefiles (instead of the vc++ projects), and 2) very careful attention to
compiler/linker flags specified in extconf.rb.
Kevin, I had to modify app.cpp, depend, extconf.rb, and wx.h. I
2004 Oct 01
14
wxruby-swig on Windows & possible release
I''m trying to build wxruby-swig on windows with the idea of building a
windows installer for it. I think that this would go a long way toward
encouraging windows developers to try out wxruby-swig. What do you think?
Are we far enough along to contemplate a release?
Building wxruby-swig on windows is actually going pretty smoothly, but I
want to build it with vc++ 7.1 to match the
2004 Apr 15
9
RubyGems and wxRuby
Kevin, were you planning to do a linux tarball or RPM for 0.3 before
focusing on the SWIG version? I think its important for many obvious
reasons, but I''ll just mention the one that prompted me to write this email.
In the long term, I''d like to see wxRuby become the standard GUI toolkit for
ruby, and I am simultaneously working several fronts to help make that
happen. My
2003 Oct 25
9
Windows Compile Error
I''ve gotten a lot farther building wxRuby than I did a few months ago. But
its getting late here and I''m going to bed.
In the meantime, does anyone know why I''m getting this compile error:
Microsoft (R) Program Maintenance Utility Version 6.00.8168.0
Copyright (C) Microsoft Corp 1988-1998. All rights reserved.
cl -MD -Zi -O2b2xg- -G6
2004 Mar 30
12
Big question: Move to SWIG?
A few days ago, someone asked me why I am using wxpp instead of SWIG.
The question prompted me to revisit and re-evaluate SWIG, and I now
believe it would be best to convert wxRuby to SWIG.
SWIG has greatly improved its C++ support since the last time I looked
at it, and I think its Ruby support has improved quite a bit as well.
Also, now that I have written wxpp, I understand the nature of
2004 Jul 12
28
Windows compilation problems
Last week I was struggling to get xrc built into wxRuby and finally got
it to compile. The problem I am now having is that the normal samples
are not working at all (have not even tried any xrc stuff yet). So to
test if it is a problem with xrc or my build process I tried compiling
wxRuby without XRC, this caused the same error to be printed out as the
failed XRC build.
The output (in both
2004 Jan 06
2
Debug and Release builds of the wxRuby Windows Installer
Ok, I now have both debug and release build installers for wxRuby 0.2 on
windows. As I said in my earlier emails these are designed to install on top
of Andy Hunt''s one-click Ruby Installer for Windows (version 1.8.0).
In the start menu I create a wxRuby group with shortcuts to run the sample
apps and to display "wxRuby Help" (which is just a freshly updated version
of the
2003 Dec 13
5
Getting ready for 0.2 release
As I mentioned in October (wow, time moves quickly!), there are two big
items I would like to have in a 0.2 release of wxRuby:
1. Binary builds for as many platforms as possible
2. A document describing how to use the standard wxWindows/wxPython
documentation to develop wxRuby apps
In order for this to happen in any reasonable time frame, I will need
help. For those of you here who are not
2003 Nov 06
2
MinGW build (static linking) problem
Hi!
I am trying to build wxruby with statically linked wxWindows library, but
so far - no luck - bunch of unresolved references during the linking phase.
I''ve seen on the list that Curt was being able to build it, so any hint
would be helpful.
gcc 3.2.3 (MinGW 3.1.0) & MSYS 1.0.10rc2.
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Gour
gour@mail.inet.hr
Registered Linux User #278493
2004 Aug 29
6
wxRuby Compile Problems on Gentoo eBuild
Can you guys take a look at this and help Tom out?
Thanks,
Curt
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Payne [mailto:twp@gentoo.org]
Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2004 10:53 AM
To: Curt Hibbs
Subject: Re: FW: [ANN] wxRuby 0.5.0 has been released!
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 11:54:52AM -0500, Curt Hibbs wrote:
> Hi Tom, I just wanted to inform you that we just released a new version
> wxRuby if you
2004 Aug 06
12
0.4.0 Compiling Under Mingw
> I am compiling wxRuby 0.4.0 on WinXP Home under MingW and MSYS 1.0. I
can
> compile wxWindows and Ruby fine and I get about 20 minutes into the
wxRuby
> compile and it quits, It says:
[snip]
>
C:\mingw\bin\..\lib\gcc-lib\mingw32\3.2.3\..\..\..\..\mingw32\bin\ld.exe
:
> cannot find -lwxmsw241d
> make: *** [wxruby.so] Error 1
> I replaced the $LIBS in the extconf.rb file
2003 Nov 13
16
Submitting patches
I''m a bit new to working on a rubyforge/sourceforge/open source project,
so excuse my obliviousness. What is the preferred way of submitting a
patch to wxruby?
Thanks,
Nick
2003 Dec 12
3
I hate make
Does anyone else here think that it might be a good idea to shift wxruby
to use rake (http://rubyforge.org/projects/rake/) or perhaps one of the
other "modern" build systems?
One example of a task that would be trivial with rake, but seem to be
really painful with make: Define a tclean target that deletes all the .h
and .cpp files that are built from .t files.
I''m not sure
2004 Jan 06
5
Another Updated - wxRuby Windows installeravailable for
Hmm everything installed fine but when I try to run the samples I get an
error dialog stating:
"rubyw.exe - unable to Locate Component
This application has failed to start because MSVCRTD.dll was not found.
Re-installing the application may fix this problem."
Which unless you are supplying the debug microsoft dll''s, re-installing
will have no effect :)
This was on WinXP
2004 Apr 22
13
Rake and VC++ 6
Has anybody tried the new wxruby-swig from the msvc++ command line
compiler using ''rake''? The rakefile seems to depend on the wx_config
method, which doesn''t exist for msw because it doesn''t have BASH to
execute the shell script. Has anyone hacked the rakefile to fix this?
Nick
2003 Dec 29
5
Font support, MS Windows binaries, Mac status (?)
Wx::Font now supports almost all the methods of wxFont, which should be
good news for anyone interested in rich text editing (FreeRIDE anyone?).
These changes are checked in to CVS and my darcs repository.
Thanks to Nobuaki Arima for submitting font support code. Although I
didn''t actually use that font code, I did directly use the included
sample file, and the changes to const.cpp.
2004 Apr 18
5
wxruby.so size under Linux?
Today, I noticed that a completely clean build of wxRuby on my desktop
machine is about 5.8 megs, but on my laptop is about 9.8 megs.
Both computers are running Debian GNU/Linux, but my laptop is more of a
mix of releases, whereas my desktop is almost entirely Sarge/Testing.
Both are using gcc 3.3.3. In both cases, I did a full "get", and did a
make from scratch.
Any ideas about