similar to: wxRuby-SWIG 0.0.3 is available

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "wxRuby-SWIG 0.0.3 is available"

2004 Aug 20
8
wxruby-swig: where does wxclasses-2.4.2.xml comes from?
Was trying to understand more about the internals of wxruby-swig, where does the big chunk of XML comes from? I saw something similiar in Python, is that massaged out of there? The codes produced by extractxml.rb and wxclasses-2.4.2.xml is quite different from the original header files. Just for example the WxDialog class. OnXXX are non-virtual in WxWidgets, but virtual in wxruby-swig
2004 Mar 30
12
Big question: Move to SWIG?
A few days ago, someone asked me why I am using wxpp instead of SWIG. The question prompted me to revisit and re-evaluate SWIG, and I now believe it would be best to convert wxRuby to SWIG. SWIG has greatly improved its C++ support since the last time I looked at it, and I think its Ruby support has improved quite a bit as well. Also, now that I have written wxpp, I understand the nature of
2004 Dec 17
14
WxRuby-SWIG and WxWidgets 2.5.x
A while back there was a discussion about what version of WxWidgets to target with WxRuby-SWIG. I don''t remember seeing any resolution, but I gather that thus far WxRuby-SWIG has continued to target 2.4.2, with the thinking that WxRuby-SWIG would quickly mature to the point that it could replace WxRuby, and once that was done the focus would shift to working with 2.5.x.
2004 Jul 20
6
The great MSVC wxruby-swig bug hunt!
Hi everyone, As Kevin has just announced, wxruby-swig has been moved into CVS as a toplevel project. It still is not in a "releasable" form yet, but it now builds on more systems than it doesn''t, and is moving towards stability. Because of the complexity of the build environment, we''re using rake (http://rake.rubyforge.org) as a build system instead of the standard
2005 Jul 20
3
Plans to rename wxruby-swig to wxruby2
Greetings all, Over the last few months, while I have been busy on other projects, Nick and other folks have built wxruby-swig up to where it now supports about 120 classes, compared to the 139 in wxruby 0.6. When you include the fact that wxruby 0.6 had a few classes that really weren''t needed (because non-wx ruby versions work fine), it looks like wxruby-swig is actually very
2005 Feb 20
11
Suggestion for wxruby name change
We''ve had some discussion in the past about the wxruby vs wxruby-swig name, and how they are a bit confusing. My big problem with ''wxruby-swig'' is that unless you know what ''swig'' is, it''s not a terribly useful (or sexy) postfix. It''s like naming a car after it''s manufacturing process - "the all new Acura
2004 Jun 11
5
Re: FW: problems installing wxruby
Jeremy Stell-Smith wrote: > Thanks a lot for the help, guys. I''m up and running with 2.4.2, but I > did have a few questions. Excellent. > So first, a friend and I basically have this month to dedicate to trying > to get a ruby ide pilot built on top of wxRuby. So, no, I really can''t > wait a few weeks to start. Any chance you could commit changes into cvs
2004 Aug 25
3
wxclasses-2.4.2.xml
I couldn''t find the original tex document that the author of the xml file converted from. Anyone knows where it is? I am toying with the idea of _not using_ the xml file. Either getting the wx header files thru SWIG (I assume you guys have thought about this before already, any specific problems?), or continue with the template generator in the current wxruby-4.0. The RUBY port of
2004 Apr 17
1
wxruby-swig progress report
Tonight, I generated a full set of almost 400 swiggable .h files, one for each wxWidgets class. I used the big xml file that I mentioned earlier, which itself was (apparently) scraped from the wxWidgets html help files. Several interesting notes: 1. REXML took forever to parse the 2.5 meg xml file. I didn''t want to do stream processing, and hoped to stay with a pure-ruby solution,
2004 Aug 08
7
wxruby-swig progress report
Hey everybody, I''ve made some progress on wxruby-swig, and have some good news and some bad news. The good news is that the MSVC version finally can run all of the samples provided in CVS. I''m using the same solve-by-ignore solution to the GC problem that wxruby uses, so there is far less crashing goin'' on. Depending on the next few weeks, we might be able to
2005 Feb 04
8
wxruby swig update
Good news and bad news. First he good news. wxruby-swig now compiles on Linux, Mac, and Windows using wxWidgets 2.5. I just patched a bug with the paint method today, but it''s getting very close to the first release of wxruby. With a little more cleanup, I think we''re getting ready to do a first release of it, which will hopefully replaced wxruby. Of course, the debug spew
2004 Sep 01
2
wxruby swig progress
I''ve checked a number of new .i files into the wxruby-swig tree. Not all of them are fully tested, but I thought it would be better for them to be there than to have somebody start duplicating the work. I''ve also added the ''caret'' and ''image'' samples, as well as the generic etc/test.rb. These need the unreleased SWIG-1.3.22. The current
2004 Apr 15
9
RubyGems and wxRuby
Kevin, were you planning to do a linux tarball or RPM for 0.3 before focusing on the SWIG version? I think its important for many obvious reasons, but I''ll just mention the one that prompted me to write this email. In the long term, I''d like to see wxRuby become the standard GUI toolkit for ruby, and I am simultaneously working several fronts to help make that happen. My
2004 Apr 29
10
wxruby-swig 0.0.12 is up
This one includes the latest App.cpp which includes the Mac fix from Nick. I thought it was in 0.0.11, but it wasn''t. It also adds support for "stock objects", like colours, pens, and fonts. This turned out to be quite challenging, but I''m happy with the solution. It only took a few days :-/ Kevin
2005 May 03
4
Wx::HtmlWindow.on_link_clicked
Hello, wxruby-users. This is an addition which implement wrapper for overloading wxHtmlWindow::OnLinkClicked method. Unfortunately, it was impossible to make it correctly without ugly hack to wxpp.rb, but i`m hope it does not broke it. Please look at attachment for a patch for htmlwindow.t and wxpp.rb and additional file htmllinkinfo.t (need to be added to $objs array in extconf.rb). Sample
2004 Apr 24
1
wxruby-swig 0.0.7
I just pushed a new wxruby-swig, which includes the known MSWin rakefile changes. It also has some significant internal improvements that will make it easier to add classes, and it includes support for one new class (wxEvent). wxruby-swig is now licensed under the "MIT license". wxRuby will remain under the wxWindows license as long as we are releasing the old code base. When we
2004 Apr 04
5
SWIG update
I have a minimal working version of a SWIG-based wxRuby that can bring up an empty Frame with a title. On my system, it crashes on exit. I suspect this is the same problem that I mentioned months ago when I first upgraded to wxWindows 2.4.2. The problem mysteriously vanished at some point, but now it is back. I fiddled with this new code for several frustrating hours, and couldn''t
2004 May 02
6
Progress on wxruby-swig segfaults
It has been a frustrating couple days. I have been tracking down the bug where any wxruby-swig app will crash/segfault upon exit. Yesterday, I fixed the problem where the App object was being freed twice. Today, after several hours of debugging, I discovered that the Frame object is also being deleted twice (for a different reason). I have asked Lyle Johnson for some guidance, because it is
2005 Apr 27
6
does anyone have success with wxruby with wxwidgets 2.6?
Hello, All. I`m trying to compile wxruby with wxwidgets 2.6 under windows with latest mingw, but have lot of troubles. wxwidgets and ruby 1.8.2 compiles just fine, examples work pretty well. To make wxruby compile (non-swig, from cvs) i was made some minor changes like explicit cast ("IN2NUM(...)" to "INT2NUM((long) ...)"), removed some constant definitions from const.cpp
2004 Oct 01
14
wxruby-swig on Windows & possible release
I''m trying to build wxruby-swig on windows with the idea of building a windows installer for it. I think that this would go a long way toward encouraging windows developers to try out wxruby-swig. What do you think? Are we far enough along to contemplate a release? Building wxruby-swig on windows is actually going pretty smoothly, but I want to build it with vc++ 7.1 to match the