similar to: New Docs - One Look and a Partial Glance

Ok, my first complete swipe for the new docs (but still with old rdoc default output templates) can be seen at: http://www.mktec.com/dev_www/wxruby-docs/ Most of the classes/methods documentation came out fine, but I still need finetune because some methods don''t get documented at all, like methods in the classes Bitmap and Frame. Once I can get it so all things get documented

A while back there was a discussion about what version of WxWidgets to target with WxRuby-SWIG. I don''t remember seeing any resolution, but I gather that thus far WxRuby-SWIG has continued to target 2.4.2, with the thinking that WxRuby-SWIG would quickly mature to the point that it could replace WxRuby, and once that was done the focus would shift to working with 2.5.x.

Ok, the link: http://www.mktec.com/dev_www/wxrubydocs/ (try http://www.mktec.com/dev_www/wxruby-docs/ ,it does not work for me, although this is the actual directory, could you email me privately if this does/doesn''t work for you, thx) Updates in this preview of the new docs: - a new RDOC template courtesty of Nick - fixed paragraph jumping and monospace text where it

The following patches shave some rough edges off the tools build system to allow cross compiling for at least arm32 and arm64 based on the Debian/Ubuntu multiarch infrastructure. They also add the necessary fixes to build for arm64 (which I have only tried cross, not native). I have posted some instructions on how to compile with these patches on the wiki:

Hello NG, found a thread with almost my current problem. There wasn't any solution out there. Maybe anything has changed? I want install samba v3.0.9 on an old rh linux v7.1. Currently there's no chance to update the core system. But while compiling it breaks with many "vfs"-errors as shown below: ..SNIP.. modules/vfs_shadow_copy.po(.text+0x6e2): undefined reference to

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This is the latest stable release of Samba. This is the version that production Samba servers should be running for all current bug-fixes. There have been several important issues fixes since the 3.0.8 release. Common bugs fixed in 3.0.9 include: ~ o Problem updating roaming user profiles. ~ o Crash in smbd when printing from a Windows 9x client.

It's half a nice Saturday later and many attempts have brought no satisfaction. Maybe this can't be done. I'm trying to write a function which, when called from one function execute in another. In itself, that's not the problem. Rather, there's one built-in variable which is evaluated in the function definition and it's value is then set (too early). Here's the one

Hi, I would like to implement macro debug info support in LLVM. Below you will find 4 parts: 1. Background on what does it mean to debug macros. 2. A brief explanation on how to represent macro debug info in DWARF 4.0. 3. The suggested design. 4. A full example: Source -> AST -> LLVM IR -> DWARF. Feel free to skip first two parts if you think you know the background.

Hi - attached is a patch to enable building DragonEgg (x86_64) for LLVM3.3 and LLVM3.4. That is, add these changes to the 3.3 release, and it becomes possible to build DragonEgg against a llvm3.4 compiler. Regards, Richard Gorton Cognitive Electronics rcgorton at cog-e.com ---------- -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name:

Morten Ofstad wrote: >> Hi, >> >> There's no HAVE_RAND48 symbol provided by autoconf. You'll have to >> add the appropriate check to autoconf/configure.ac before we can take >> this patch. I installed autoconf with cygwin now and I think I've managed to do this right now -- there are some strange problems with running the AutoRegen.sh script, so I

> Hi, > > There's no HAVE_RAND48 symbol provided by autoconf. You'll have to add > the appropriate check to autoconf/configure.ac before we can take this > patch. Sorry I forgot to mention I didn't make any changes to the configure script. The problem is that I can't test these things since I'm not on a Unix platform, and I'm not even using the

> Do we really need to touch the AST? Or would it be reasonable to wire up the CGDebugInfo directly to the PPCallbacks, if it isn't already? (perhaps it is already wired up for other reasons?) This sound as a good idea, I will check that approach. PPCallbacks is only an interface, has nothing connected to it, but we will create a new class, which implement PPCallbacks, for macros. So we can

Options given on the command line have precedence over configuration from files. This can be useful, for example, for a roaming node, for which 'ConnectTo' and <host>.Address depends on its location. --- This patch is against stable branch. Merging this patch to the 1.1 branch is trivial. I use this patch on my Debian for several weeks. Here is the ifupdown script I use (some

> Not necessarily, if we kept the macros in order in the list of macros attached to the CU, which I imagine we would. OK, now I understand what you are aiming for. I really do not favor one on the other. But, can you explain what is the advantage of the parent approach over the children approach? If any, the children approach seems to be the one reduces the LLVM IR size, is not it? Regards,

> Right - I was wondering if CGDebugInfo already implemented PPCallbacks or was otherwise being notified of PPCallback related things, possibly through a layer or two of indirection. I checked the approach of skipping representing macros in AST, and communicate them directly from Parser to CGDebugInfo. However, I could not find a way to initialize this communication. The only interface

On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 08:37:00AM -0800, Martin Pool wrote: > On 10 Oct 2002, "Green, Paul" <Paul.Green@stratus.com> wrote: > > No new CVS messages have appeared on the rsync-cvs archives since August > > 30th. This seems rather odd-- perhaps a daemon stopped working? If there > > has truly been no activity since that date, I apologize for > >

Since I''m setting up my development environment on a new system, I figure now is the time to get rid of one of the extra dependencies: NQXML. It appears that REXML can now parse the whole classes xml file in about 20 seconds on this machine, which is a huge improvement over the many, many minutes it used to take. So I am now updating extract.rb to use REXML instead of NQXML.

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Aboud, Amjad <amjad.aboud at intel.com> wrote: > I found a way to skip representing macros in AST and create them directly > in CGDebugInfo through PPCallbacks during preprocessing. > > To do that, I needed to extend ASTConsumer interface with this extra > method: > > > > /// If the consumer is interested in notifications from

I''m fairly new to the Ruby world, particularly WxRuby, so please forgive me if this is ground that''s been covered in the past. I''m trying to load a frame from an XRC file (created using DialogBlocks), and I''m having trouble getting an instance of the Gauge object using the Wx::Window.find_window_by_xxx methods. I''m trying this on Windows XP,

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:21 AM, David Blaikie via cfe-dev < > cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Aboud, Amjad <amjad.aboud at intel.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I found a way to skip representing macros in AST and create them