similar to: --max-vsize

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Michael Lawrence <lawrence.michael at gene.com> wrote: > Just wanted to start a discussion on whether R could ship with more > appropriate GC parameters. I've been doing a number of similar measurements, and have come to the same conclusion. R is currently very conservative about memory usage, and this leads to unnecessarily poor performance on

>>>>> Peter Haverty <haverty.peter at gene.com> >>>>> on Mon, 19 Jan 2015 08:50:08 -0800 writes: > Hi All, This is a very important issue. It would be very > sad to leave most users unaware of a free speedup of this > size. These options don't appear in the R --help > output. They really should be added there. Indeed,

The R memory docs say that the --*-vsize option takes an integer argument and then 'G', 'M', 'K', or 'k'. When I start R using R --max-vsize=10G I receive the warning: WARNING: --max-vsize=10G=10'M': too large and ignored The system that I'm working on is a 64-bit Sun server with 40G of memory. What is the correct syntax for this command? Daniel

I am running R version ??? under Redhat 5.2. It seems as though the --nsize object has no effct on the size of the allocated Ncells as determined using gc(). Yes, I have that much data.... That is if I envoke R with R --vsize 100 --nsize 5000000 then type gc() I get free total Ncells 92202 200000 Vcells 12928414 13107200 Thanks Tony Long Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Steinhaus

Hello, I'm using a 64bit Linux with 16GB of RAM. I'd like to limit the memory that the R process can use so I'm trying to use --max-vsize switch. However, it is seems that I can't enforce a limit above 2GB. shlomo at hippo:~$ uname -a Linux hippo 2.6.24-16-generic #1 SMP Thu Apr 10 12:47:45 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux This WORKS: -------------------- shlomo at hippo:~$ R

Martin M has suggested I widen this discussion to R-devel, and > I agree that we should increase them, > but I'm not sure at all about the amount. > > The default could even depend on the architecture (via "./configure").. Views, please. ------------- Begin Forwarded Message ------------- Is is not time we increased the defaults a bit? As the base gets bigger I hit

I'm using dovecot 2.2.24 on FreeBSD 10.3. I'm working on converting users from maildir to mdbox, for the usual reasons. I have converted some test users and they generally work fine. But when I run "doveadm mailbox status" I get a Panic if I ask for the vsize field (or "all"), but other fields work fine. For example: # doveadm mailbox status -u bubbacheex3

Full_Name: Markus Neteler Version: 1.0.0 OS: Linux 2.2.10/i686 Submission from: (NULL) (130.75.72.37) Hi, I wanted to "check" the R.GRASS GIS interface from Roger Bivand: http://www.geog.uni-hannover.de/grass/statsgrasslist.html using R CMD check --vsize=10M GRASS but: [error message shortened] > G <- gmeta() Error: heap memory (6144 Kb) exhausted [needed 1024 Kb more]

I'd like to add S=<size> and W=<vsize> to the filenames in my Maildir storage for newly delivered mails. But I cannot find where I can make Dovecot's LDA add those. Anybody? http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/Maildir says: A maildir filename with those fields would look something like: 1035478339.27041_118.foo.org,S=1000,W=1030:2,S which is exactly what I want, but it

Hi to all, I'm a sys admin in a college, and we're using Dovecot as IMAP/POP3 server and delivery; we're also patch dovecot to add managesieve capability. I've a question: I've read on dovecot's wiki, that is possible improve the performance on maildir files by adding ,S=<size>,W=<vsize> fields on filename. How is possible to do that ? I've search on all

Hi, i want to keep track of user mailbox size, I'm using doveadm mailbox status -u <user> vsize INBOX for a given mailbox this is under reporting ( by a lot) is this recursive? what shoud i be using to get an accurate disk usage metric? thanks Paul. -- ------------------------- Paul Macdonald IFDNRG Ltd Web and video hosting ------------------------- t: 0131 5548070 m:

I've just ported a largeish procmail script across to sieve and want to get to use wildcards in filing mail and can't seem to get regex to work. The script starts nicely with: > require ["fileinto","regex","envelope","vacation","regex"]; and a bit down these few lines comes into play: > elsif header :regex "From"

Hi All, At present I am running a largeish (~450 stations) NT based network (with win2k/XP clients) in a school in the UK, and I am looking into the feasability of moving to samba 3+LDAP over the summer. Has anyone had much experience of this, and are there any major problems? My concerns are with the following: - Seamless transition from NT to Samba without having to re-add user

Hi All, This is a very important issue. It would be very sad to leave most users unaware of a free speedup of this size. These options don't appear in the R --help output. They really should be added there. Additionally, if the garbage collector is working very hard, might it emit a note about better setting for these variables? It's not really my place to comment on design philosophy,

Hi, somtimes i have trivial recodings like this: > dim(tt) [1] 252382 98 system.time(for(i in 2:length(tt)){ tt[,i][is.na(tt[,i])] <- 0 }) ...and a win2000(XP2000+,1GB) machine makes it in several minutes, but my linux notebook (XP2.6GHZ,512MB) don't get success after some hours. I recognize that the cpu load is most time relative small, but the hardisk

On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 5:53 AM Joerg Roedel <joro at 8bytes.org> wrote: > > From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky at amd.com> > > The runtime handler needs a GHCB per CPU. Set them up and map them > unencrypted. > > Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky at amd.com> > Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> > --- >

Just wanted to start a discussion on whether R could ship with more appropriate GC parameters. Right now, loading the recommended package Matrix leads to: > library(Matrix) > gc() used (Mb) gc trigger (Mb) max used (Mb) Ncells 1076796 57.6 1368491 73.1 1198505 64.1 Vcells 1671329 12.8 2685683 20.5 1932418 14.8 Results may vary, but here R needed 64MB of N cells and 15MB

Hi, I upgraded from Dovecot v2.0.16 to v2.1.7 over night and I noticed this morning that one of my daily reports which lists summarised mailbox sizes per user has started listing nonsense for vsizes. The reporting script at its core calls : doveadm -f flow mailbox status -A -t 'messages vsize' '*' It appears that Dovecot 2.1.7 is not resetting the vsize after collating the sum

  R-devel, I am migrating from R.2.13.2 to R.2.15.1 and just realize that R command line options --max-nsize and --max-vsize are no longer supported along with the defunct of mem.limits(). To me, the function and options along with other two, --min-nsize and --min-vsize, are useful in allowing some explicit control of R memory usage. One benefit is that the setting of maximum boundary could

Hi to all, I'm a sys admin in a college, and we're using Dovecot as IMAP/POP3 server and delivery; we're also patch dovecot to add managesieve capability. I've a question: I've read on dovecot's wiki, that is possible improve the performance on maildir file by adding ,S=<size>,W=<vsize> fields on filename. How is possible to do that ? I've search on all