similar to: Problem with expression evaluation depth (PR#436)

Jose Miguel Perez <jperez@cesma.usb.ve> writes: > I think I found the root of the problem. > My program throws out some cycles of the loop > using 'next'. > The following code shows the behavior of R_EvalDepth in these cases: > without next: > > for (i in 1:10 ) {} > 0 > 1 > 2 > 2 > 1 > 1 > 1 > 1 > 1 > 1 > 1 > > with next:

Full_Name: Jose M. Perez Version: 0.64.2 OS: Linux/x86 Submission from: (NULL) (159.90.200.68) sample(1,1,prob=c(1)) Causes a core dump. -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the

Hello, (This is follow up from this thread: http://www.nabble.com/execution-time-of-.packages-td22304833.html but with a different focus) I am often confused by the result of the profiler, when a loop is involved. Consider these two scripts: script1: Rprof( ) x <- numeric( ) for( i in 1:10000){ x <- c( x, rnorm(10) ) } Rprof( NULL ) print( summaryRprof( ) ) script2:

i see this message in the dmesg , any one know this problem and the soliontion ??? Losing some ticks... checking if CPU frequency changed. thaks Jos? P?rez

On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 18:56:06 +0000 Ryan Novosielski <novosirj at rutgers.edu> wrote: On my machine, getOption('expressions') is 5000 and the example from the test correctly stops with length(traceback()) == 2500. (And the simpler example of f <- function() f(); f() stops with length(traceback()) == 5000). > Traceback: <...> > 2718: foo() This (traceback() being

A common need in R frontends is to provide some sort of read, (parse), evaluate, print loop. However, there are also a number of points where frontends may want to differ from the standard REPL as available e.g. in R_ReplDLLdo1(). First some thoughts on what is needed, and what is already there, or missing. If you want to skip over this, a short summary is provided in the second half, below

Hi there, I initially asked about this on r-help and was told this might be a better venue. I?m not really convinced from reading the posting guide, but I?ll give it a shot. It was also suggested that the R-Project doesn?t really care about building with ?non-standard? compilers, but I can?t find any evidence of that on the website (indeed, there?s some mention of successful past builds, and the

I'm getting this error when I try to make after my configure, any solutions? Thanks in advance... make[2]: Entering directory `/export/trichodon2/R/R-1.0.0/demos/dynload' /usr/local/bin/make zero.so make[3]: Entering directory `/export/trichodon2/R/R-1.0.0/demos/dynload' /export/trichodon2/R/R-0.99.0a/bin/SHLIB: /export/trichodon2/R/R-0.99.0a/bin/SHLIB: cannot open make[3]: ***

Maybe a bit off topic. (I don't deal with any data even remotely that large.) How would you use these new options - just as a way to break large tasks into smaller "batches"? If rsync "stops in the middle", then the target would be in a sort of limbo where it might not be fully usable. Joe On 01/22/2015 09:38 AM, samba-bugs at samba.org wrote: >

Hello, I am having a little trouble finding the right set of criteria to subset a portion of data. I am using an instrument that does depth profiles of a water column. The instrument records on the way down as well as the way up. ## So I am left with data like this: dat <- data.frame(var = runif(11, 0, 10)) dat$depth <- c(1:5,5,5:1) # So for the example dat ## I am trying tp figure out

Hello, Apologies for a similar earlier post. I didn't include enough details in that one. I am having a little trouble subsetting some data based on a grouping variable. I am using an instrument that does depth profiles of a water column. The instrument records on the way down as well as the way up. So thanks to an off-list reply I can subset the data so that all data collected at the

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11067 Bug ID: 11067 Summary: add --min-depth and --max-depth options Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter:

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2008:0494 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0494.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: f875f774254d08a02b6bdc5f00b5fd8c rgmanager-2.0.38-2.el5_2.1.i386.rpm Source: 491da7229b53e6bb0333289a8c43c86b rgmanager-2.0.38-2.el5_2.1.src.rpm -- Karanbir

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2008:0494 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0494.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 5bb7058fa29cb0b5b8927e37c3a024fb rgmanager-2.0.38-2.el5_2.1.x86_64.rpm Source: 491da7229b53e6bb0333289a8c43c86b rgmanager-2.0.38-2.el5_2.1.src.rpm --

Freshmeat says: Following up to yesterday's Linux 2.0.38 release, Alan Cox sent out a security notice about a remote network DoS vulnerability which is present in all Linux 2.0.x systems. Linux 2.2.x is not affected by this bug. Causing this requires a great deal of skill and probably a reasonably local network access as it is extremely timing dependant. Nevertheless everyone is advised to

A binary distribution of R 0.99.0a is available from http://www.r-project.org/bin/windows/windows-NT/base Pre-compiled packages for this version are now available from the Windows contrib area on CRAN (http://www.r-project.org/bin/windows/windows-NT/contrib). In many cases a new version is needed, and all have been rebuilt using the latest improvements in the help conversion. All the changes

A binary distribution of R 0.99.0a is available from http://www.r-project.org/bin/windows/windows-NT/base Pre-compiled packages for this version are now available from the Windows contrib area on CRAN (http://www.r-project.org/bin/windows/windows-NT/contrib). In many cases a new version is needed, and all have been rebuilt using the latest improvements in the help conversion. All the changes

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=544 Summary: sshd w/privsep fails on Linux 2.0, mm_receive_fd: expected type 1 got 1074276337 Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd

If there are models of type M in session, and objects of type M contain objects of type M'', does M'' need to be included in model()? -- fxn

I have a model using acts_as_tree which is working fine. Being new to Ruby I''m don''t know what enumerator is best to use for traversing a tree by depth. I can write one, but before I do I wanted to know if there is there an enumerator for traversing trees available that the community recommends? Thank you, Jose -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.