Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "progress update, 0.0.37"
2006 Oct 18
0
progress on porting wxscintilla
I''ve made some progress on getting Scintilla to work on OS X. I got a
static build of wxscintilla as libwxscintilla.a. To do this, turns out
all I needed to do was
make release
But I had to go a tortuous route to find this out. Anyway, this gives me
a library against which I can build the wxscintilla sample.
It also builds without error when added to wxruby (following the model
of
2006 Nov 21
0
[747] trunk/wxruby2/Changelog: get_item stuff, evt_toolbar, also correct a commit from 0.0.37 that I missed
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /><style type="text/css"><!--
#msg dl { border: 1px #006 solid; background: #369; padding:
2006 Oct 19
2
Wx::Scintilla - working
At last, managed to get Scintilla up and running on OS X. Sorry it''s
taken so long.
Patch attached to enable Scintilla to be included in a Mac build.
More difficult was how figuring out how to get wxscintilla built in the
first place - have added instructions on our ''Building for release'' page
on the wiki:
http://wxruby.rubyforge.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Release_HowTo
2006 Oct 21
5
0.0.37 release?
I would like to tag and release 0.0.37 soon. I''m thinking of the next
few days. We have good new stuff (Printing, Scintilla on OS X, other new
classes) and have fixed some bugs. Also, would be good to put the early
build probs with the last release behind us.
Here''s the patches I think are outstanding:
- Wx::App cleanup
- rake HTML docs publishing
- Scintilla OS X
-
2006 Oct 24
8
tagged 0.0.37; release plans
Hi
I just tagged 0.0.37 in Subversion. I also added a note on the Wiki on
how to do this, and how to checkout a clean version:
http://wxruby.rubyforge.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Release_HowTo
For the build, I''m just about to upload a tarball, and will add a
powerpc gem once the compiler''s chugged away. Please upload for your
platform as you''re ready.
I suggest we announce
2007 Jul 26
0
[ wxruby-Feature Requests-12594 ] re-enable wxScintilla
Feature Requests item #12594, was opened at 2007-07-26 09:26
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=221&aid=12594&group_id=35
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Alex Fenton (brokentoy)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: re-enable wxScintilla
Initial Comment:
There is SWIG code to port Wx::Scintilla in
2006 Nov 17
5
0.0.38 release?
Hi
Should we look to do a 0.0.38 release soon? I think we should get an
updated set of gems out there to show we are making progress.
So if you have a moment over the next couple of days, please could you
post how stable a release gem from SVN HEAD is on your OS?
Linux seems OK on release, crashes in debug mode - which seem to relate
to the same failed assertion from wx/event.h.
2006 Sep 12
6
Scintilla
wxScintilla already comes with a SWIG friendly header file. I modified
the rakewx and the Scintilla.i file to include it directly from the
wxScintilla install. This means it''s an odd-ball compared to our other
classes. Does anyone see a problem with this? I think it''s best to use
the one supplied with the installation to avoid problems of the header
file getting out of
2007 Sep 11
1
wxRuby 1.9.1, wxSugar 0.1.17
I''m very happy to announce that new versions of wxRuby and wxSugar are
now available.
== CHANGES ==
* Merged nice ruby-style syntax options into core wxRuby
* Re-added support for StyledTextCtrl (Scintilla) component
* Added BitmapComboBox and RendererNative classes
* Fixed nasty bug which could cause instability in XML-loaded layouts
* Numerous other fixes and new methods in existing
2006 Oct 30
0
memory mgmt etc
Hi
Seems we ran into what football commentators call a ''run of bad form'',
when you can''t get the ball in the net for love nor money, and your
defence is leaking goals like an extension library leaks memory. But no
bad run lasts forever, so wanted to get your thoughts on what we should
focus on next. Apologies for a longish email.
Roy''s experiences with
2005 Sep 18
1
Scintilla to try out
Here''s a .zip file with the files and directory structure needed to try
out my scintilla changes. It also included a help file. You''ll, of
course, need to download wxScintilla from here:
https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=51305&package_id=45182
Oh. Hmm, I just noticed he made a new build today. I guess I''ll have
to go see what''s
2004 Jun 11
5
Re: FW: problems installing wxruby
Jeremy Stell-Smith wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the help, guys. I''m up and running with 2.4.2, but I
> did have a few questions.
Excellent.
> So first, a friend and I basically have this month to dedicate to trying
> to get a ruby ide pilot built on top of wxRuby. So, no, I really can''t
> wait a few weeks to start. Any chance you could commit changes into cvs
2008 May 18
0
[ wxruby-Bugs-20211 ] Unresolved symbol due to linkage error
Bugs item #20211, was opened at 2008-05-18 13:46
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=218&aid=20211&group_id=35
Category: Compile/build
Group: current
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Tobias Peters (t-peters)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: Unresolved symbol due to linkage error
Initial Comment:
While compiling wxruby
2006 Oct 25
5
OS X intel
Hi Sean
Thanks for the info on OS intel.
Glad that at least it''s only broken on Scintilla, not generally. If you
could upload a gem w/o Scintilla that would be great.
Perhaps some library or framework that''s needed on 10.4 that 10.3
doesn''t need. I don''t know.
cheers
alex
2007 May 21
5
Wx::Scintilla class not defined
I''m posting this for a friend who is having trouble with this and here is
his message.
"Heya! I''m working on a script editor application, but it''s missing one key
feature: Syntax highlighting. Seeing this, I looked around in the sample
directory and came across scintilla.rb. I attempted a run, however Ruby
reported Wxruby2::Scintilla as an uninitialized
2006 Oct 24
0
[716] trunk/wxruby2/Changelog: Last changes in preparation for tagging 0.0.37
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /><style type="text/css"><!--
#msg dl { border: 1px #006 solid; background: #369; padding:
2006 Oct 16
5
0.0.37 release goals
Hi
Could we set some release goals for 0.0.37? I suggest we release sooner
rather than later to put the various little build problems behind us.
So my only high-priority item for 0.037 at the moment is to port
Scintilla to Linux and OS X. I will gladly accept other feature, bugfix
and doc patches.
Anything else we''d like to be sure to do?
alex
2006 Sep 26
4
tag and release 0.0.36
I''m planning to tag 0.0.36 and release binaries from it. We have lots of
good new methods & classes & samples (mainly thanks to Roy), and I would
like to get a unicode Windows binary gem out there.
TODO are integrate Scintilla on OS X and Linux, and apply Tobias''s
patches to rakefiles. These''ll be for early in 0.0.37.
Maybe someone with Subversion experience
2005 Sep 15
5
wxScintilla vs. StyledTextControl
There is a contribution called ''stc'' (StyledTextControl) that comes with
wxWidgets. It appears that this is -also- a wrapper around Scintilla.
I can''t tell if one or the other of these two is a better choice or if
there''s a particular reason to favor one over the other. I can see that
having the source available right there in the contrib directory would
2006 Oct 02
2
DragImage
Attached a set of patches and new files to implement DragImage + sample
for bigdemo.
Alex
_______________________________________________
wxruby-users mailing list
wxruby-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wxruby-users